临床和转化科学家的团队科学培训:有效性评估。

IF 2 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.10088
Anne Mook, Verena Knerich, Goldie Komaie, Lisa Cicutto, Jennifer Cross
{"title":"临床和转化科学家的团队科学培训:有效性评估。","authors":"Anne Mook, Verena Knerich, Goldie Komaie, Lisa Cicutto, Jennifer Cross","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.10088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for addressing complex clinical and translational research challenges. This paper presents and evaluates a structured team science training program developed by the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI), while also introducing and validating a novel assessment tool used to measure changes in key teaming competencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the effectiveness of this program between 2020 and 2022 using pre- and post-program surveys (<i>N</i> = 221). Our evaluation tool was designed to capture familiarity with teaming concepts and the frequency of applying collaborative practices. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to validate the grouping of these competencies, and paired <i>t</i>-tests were used to measure changes over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA revealed three distinct components of team science competencies: Team Planning, Managing a Team, and Interpersonal Relations, all demonstrating strong internal reliability. Participants showed statistically significant improvements (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in all three domains. Gains were robust in Team Planning and Managing a Team, emphasizing structured tools and practices. Although improvement was also observed in Interpersonal Relations, the overall gains were smaller.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the self-reported value of Team Science Training programs in CTR settings. The TEAMS instrument described in this manuscript offers a novel approach for CTSAs to evaluate their Team Science training programs. Future applications could include longitudinal tracking and integration metrics to support future program planning, particularly fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and team integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team science training for clinical and translational Scientists: An assessment of effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Mook, Verena Knerich, Goldie Komaie, Lisa Cicutto, Jennifer Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2025.10088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for addressing complex clinical and translational research challenges. This paper presents and evaluates a structured team science training program developed by the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI), while also introducing and validating a novel assessment tool used to measure changes in key teaming competencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the effectiveness of this program between 2020 and 2022 using pre- and post-program surveys (<i>N</i> = 221). Our evaluation tool was designed to capture familiarity with teaming concepts and the frequency of applying collaborative practices. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to validate the grouping of these competencies, and paired <i>t</i>-tests were used to measure changes over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA revealed three distinct components of team science competencies: Team Planning, Managing a Team, and Interpersonal Relations, all demonstrating strong internal reliability. Participants showed statistically significant improvements (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in all three domains. Gains were robust in Team Planning and Managing a Team, emphasizing structured tools and practices. Although improvement was also observed in Interpersonal Relations, the overall gains were smaller.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the self-reported value of Team Science Training programs in CTR settings. The TEAMS instrument described in this manuscript offers a novel approach for CTSAs to evaluate their Team Science training programs. Future applications could include longitudinal tracking and integration metrics to support future program planning, particularly fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and team integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392353/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:有效的跨学科合作对于解决复杂的临床和转化研究挑战至关重要。本文介绍并评估了由科罗拉多州临床与转化科学研究所(CCTSI)开发的结构化团队科学培训计划,同时还介绍并验证了用于衡量关键团队能力变化的新型评估工具。方法:我们在2020年至2022年期间通过项目前和项目后的调查评估了该项目的有效性(N = 221)。我们的评估工具被设计用来获取对团队概念的熟悉程度和应用协作实践的频率。应用主成分分析(PCA)来验证这些能力的分组,并使用配对t检验来测量随时间的变化。结果:PCA揭示了团队科学胜任力的三个不同组成部分:团队规划、团队管理和人际关系,均表现出较强的内部信度。参与者在所有三个领域均有统计学显著改善(p < 0.05)。收益在团队计划和管理团队方面是稳健的,强调结构化的工具和实践。虽然在人际关系方面也有所改善,但总体收益较小。结论:这些发现突出了团队科学训练计划在CTR设置下的自我报告价值。本文中描述的TEAMS工具为CTSAs评估其团队科学培训计划提供了一种新颖的方法。未来的应用程序可能包括纵向跟踪和集成度量,以支持未来的计划规划,特别是促进跨学科协作和团队集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Team science training for clinical and translational Scientists: An assessment of effectiveness.

Team science training for clinical and translational Scientists: An assessment of effectiveness.

Team science training for clinical and translational Scientists: An assessment of effectiveness.

Team science training for clinical and translational Scientists: An assessment of effectiveness.

Introduction: Effective interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for addressing complex clinical and translational research challenges. This paper presents and evaluates a structured team science training program developed by the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI), while also introducing and validating a novel assessment tool used to measure changes in key teaming competencies.

Methods: We evaluated the effectiveness of this program between 2020 and 2022 using pre- and post-program surveys (N = 221). Our evaluation tool was designed to capture familiarity with teaming concepts and the frequency of applying collaborative practices. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to validate the grouping of these competencies, and paired t-tests were used to measure changes over time.

Results: PCA revealed three distinct components of team science competencies: Team Planning, Managing a Team, and Interpersonal Relations, all demonstrating strong internal reliability. Participants showed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) in all three domains. Gains were robust in Team Planning and Managing a Team, emphasizing structured tools and practices. Although improvement was also observed in Interpersonal Relations, the overall gains were smaller.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the self-reported value of Team Science Training programs in CTR settings. The TEAMS instrument described in this manuscript offers a novel approach for CTSAs to evaluate their Team Science training programs. Future applications could include longitudinal tracking and integration metrics to support future program planning, particularly fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and team integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信