预测先天性下尿路梗阻(LUTO)严重程度及其预后的三种不同分期系统的比较。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Ugo Maria Pierucci, Irene Paraboschi, Matthieu Peycelon, Chryso P Katsoufis, Alireza Alam, Gabriele Tonni, Mark D Kilby, Gloria Pelizzo, Rodrigo Ruano
{"title":"预测先天性下尿路梗阻(LUTO)严重程度及其预后的三种不同分期系统的比较。","authors":"Ugo Maria Pierucci, Irene Paraboschi, Matthieu Peycelon, Chryso P Katsoufis, Alireza Alam, Gabriele Tonni, Mark D Kilby, Gloria Pelizzo, Rodrigo Ruano","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) is a rare but severe fetal condition associated with significant morbidity and long-term renal risk. Several prenatal staging systems have been proposed to guide management and predict outcomes, yet their comparative prognostic value remains uncertain. This review provides a structured evaluation of three staging systems currently used in clinical practice: those proposed by Ruano, Fontanella, and Nassr. Ruano's system integrates detailed ultrasound findings and biochemical markers, providing explicit stage-specific management recommendations and guidance for specific prenatal therapy. Fontanella's approach depends solely on ultrasound parameters, specifically bladder volume and the gestational timing of oligohydramnios onset, without incorporating biochemical markers or offering clear treatment guidelines. Nassr's score employs both ultrasound and biochemical data within a numerical scoring framework, focusing primarily on identifying severe cases that might benefit from prenatal intervention. Each system has distinct strengths and limitations. Further multicenter validation studies are necessary to determine which staging system most effectively predicts clinical outcomes and optimally guides management for fetuses diagnosed with LUTO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Three Different Staging Systems Capable of Predicting the Severity of Congenital Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (LUTO) and Its Prognosis.\",\"authors\":\"Ugo Maria Pierucci, Irene Paraboschi, Matthieu Peycelon, Chryso P Katsoufis, Alireza Alam, Gabriele Tonni, Mark D Kilby, Gloria Pelizzo, Rodrigo Ruano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) is a rare but severe fetal condition associated with significant morbidity and long-term renal risk. Several prenatal staging systems have been proposed to guide management and predict outcomes, yet their comparative prognostic value remains uncertain. This review provides a structured evaluation of three staging systems currently used in clinical practice: those proposed by Ruano, Fontanella, and Nassr. Ruano's system integrates detailed ultrasound findings and biochemical markers, providing explicit stage-specific management recommendations and guidance for specific prenatal therapy. Fontanella's approach depends solely on ultrasound parameters, specifically bladder volume and the gestational timing of oligohydramnios onset, without incorporating biochemical markers or offering clear treatment guidelines. Nassr's score employs both ultrasound and biochemical data within a numerical scoring framework, focusing primarily on identifying severe cases that might benefit from prenatal intervention. Each system has distinct strengths and limitations. Further multicenter validation studies are necessary to determine which staging system most effectively predicts clinical outcomes and optimally guides management for fetuses diagnosed with LUTO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下尿路梗阻(LUTO)是一种罕见但严重的胎儿疾病,具有显著的发病率和长期肾脏风险。一些产前分期系统已经提出指导管理和预测结果,但他们的比较预后价值仍然不确定。本综述对目前临床实践中使用的三种分期系统进行了结构化评估:Ruano、Fontanella和Nassr提出的分期系统。Ruano的系统集成了详细的超声检查结果和生化标记,为特定的产前治疗提供明确的阶段管理建议和指导。Fontanella的方法完全依赖于超声参数,特别是膀胱体积和羊水过少的妊娠时间,而不结合生化标志物或提供明确的治疗指南。Nassr的评分采用了数值评分框架内的超声波和生化数据,主要侧重于识别可能受益于产前干预的严重病例。每个系统都有不同的优点和局限性。需要进一步的多中心验证研究来确定哪种分期系统最有效地预测临床结果,并最佳地指导诊断为LUTO的胎儿的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Three Different Staging Systems Capable of Predicting the Severity of Congenital Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (LUTO) and Its Prognosis.

Lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) is a rare but severe fetal condition associated with significant morbidity and long-term renal risk. Several prenatal staging systems have been proposed to guide management and predict outcomes, yet their comparative prognostic value remains uncertain. This review provides a structured evaluation of three staging systems currently used in clinical practice: those proposed by Ruano, Fontanella, and Nassr. Ruano's system integrates detailed ultrasound findings and biochemical markers, providing explicit stage-specific management recommendations and guidance for specific prenatal therapy. Fontanella's approach depends solely on ultrasound parameters, specifically bladder volume and the gestational timing of oligohydramnios onset, without incorporating biochemical markers or offering clear treatment guidelines. Nassr's score employs both ultrasound and biochemical data within a numerical scoring framework, focusing primarily on identifying severe cases that might benefit from prenatal intervention. Each system has distinct strengths and limitations. Further multicenter validation studies are necessary to determine which staging system most effectively predicts clinical outcomes and optimally guides management for fetuses diagnosed with LUTO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信