根管治疗后牙裂的疗效及预后分析:改良的Iowa指数。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Norachai Wongkornchaowalit, Taratorn Soontornkiat, Tadkamol Krongbaramee, Attawood Lertpimonchai, Keith V Krell
{"title":"根管治疗后牙裂的疗效及预后分析:改良的Iowa指数。","authors":"Norachai Wongkornchaowalit, Taratorn Soontornkiat, Tadkamol Krongbaramee, Attawood Lertpimonchai, Keith V Krell","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cracked teeth requiring root canal treatment present with variable prognoses. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of root canal-treated posterior cracked teeth and to identify prognostic factors influencing endodontic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 263 cracked posterior teeth with 1- to 5-year follow-up was analyzed. The Iowa index was modified by subcategorizing each stage according to crack extension. Outcomes were assessed using strict clinical and radiographic criteria. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success and survival rates were 82.9% and 89.7%, respectively, with a mean follow-up period of 40.3 months. The estimated 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 99.2% and 78.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified 7 independent predictors of failure: increasing age, pocket depth ≥5 mm along the crack line, radicular extension ≥3 mm, preoperative periapical lesion, multiple crack lines, absence of occlusal splint in patients with parafunctional habits, and restoration with onlay or composite. Cracked teeth with probing depths <5 mm (Stages I-III) showed favorable outcomes (success rate: 78.9%-98.3%, survival rate: 86.5%-100%), whereas those exhibiting both radicular extension and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm (Stage IV-R) had poor prognosis (success rate: 33.3%, survival rate: 63.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified Iowa index, incorporating the classification of crack extension, demonstrated prognostic value. The combination of radicular crack and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm should be considered a high-risk profile when evaluating the treatment potential of cracked teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of Root Canal-treated Posterior Cracked Teeth: The Modified Iowa Index.\",\"authors\":\"Norachai Wongkornchaowalit, Taratorn Soontornkiat, Tadkamol Krongbaramee, Attawood Lertpimonchai, Keith V Krell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2025.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cracked teeth requiring root canal treatment present with variable prognoses. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of root canal-treated posterior cracked teeth and to identify prognostic factors influencing endodontic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 263 cracked posterior teeth with 1- to 5-year follow-up was analyzed. The Iowa index was modified by subcategorizing each stage according to crack extension. Outcomes were assessed using strict clinical and radiographic criteria. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success and survival rates were 82.9% and 89.7%, respectively, with a mean follow-up period of 40.3 months. The estimated 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 99.2% and 78.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified 7 independent predictors of failure: increasing age, pocket depth ≥5 mm along the crack line, radicular extension ≥3 mm, preoperative periapical lesion, multiple crack lines, absence of occlusal splint in patients with parafunctional habits, and restoration with onlay or composite. Cracked teeth with probing depths <5 mm (Stages I-III) showed favorable outcomes (success rate: 78.9%-98.3%, survival rate: 86.5%-100%), whereas those exhibiting both radicular extension and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm (Stage IV-R) had poor prognosis (success rate: 33.3%, survival rate: 63.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified Iowa index, incorporating the classification of crack extension, demonstrated prognostic value. The combination of radicular crack and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm should be considered a high-risk profile when evaluating the treatment potential of cracked teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.08.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.08.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价根管治疗后牙裂的治疗效果,探讨影响根管治疗效果的预后因素。方法:对263例后牙开裂患者进行1 ~ 5年随访。根据裂缝扩展程度对各阶段进行细分,修正了爱荷华指数。采用严格的临床和放射学标准评估结果。进行Cox回归分析以确定失败的重要预测因素。结果:总成功率82.9%,生存率89.7%,平均随访40.3个月。估计2年和5年生存率分别为99.2%和78.6%。多变量分析确定了七个独立的预测失败的因素:年龄增加,口袋深度≥5mm沿裂缝线,根延伸≥3mm,术前根尖周围病变,多条裂缝线,有功能不良习惯的患者缺少咬合夹板,以及单纯或复合修复。结论:改进的Iowa指数结合了裂纹扩展的分类,具有较好的预后价值。牙根裂合并牙周袋≥5 mm应作为评估牙裂治疗潜力的高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of Root Canal-treated Posterior Cracked Teeth: The Modified Iowa Index.

Introduction: Cracked teeth requiring root canal treatment present with variable prognoses. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of root canal-treated posterior cracked teeth and to identify prognostic factors influencing endodontic outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 263 cracked posterior teeth with 1- to 5-year follow-up was analyzed. The Iowa index was modified by subcategorizing each stage according to crack extension. Outcomes were assessed using strict clinical and radiographic criteria. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of failure.

Results: The overall success and survival rates were 82.9% and 89.7%, respectively, with a mean follow-up period of 40.3 months. The estimated 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 99.2% and 78.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified 7 independent predictors of failure: increasing age, pocket depth ≥5 mm along the crack line, radicular extension ≥3 mm, preoperative periapical lesion, multiple crack lines, absence of occlusal splint in patients with parafunctional habits, and restoration with onlay or composite. Cracked teeth with probing depths <5 mm (Stages I-III) showed favorable outcomes (success rate: 78.9%-98.3%, survival rate: 86.5%-100%), whereas those exhibiting both radicular extension and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm (Stage IV-R) had poor prognosis (success rate: 33.3%, survival rate: 63.0%).

Conclusions: The modified Iowa index, incorporating the classification of crack extension, demonstrated prognostic value. The combination of radicular crack and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm should be considered a high-risk profile when evaluating the treatment potential of cracked teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信