{"title":"优化神经危重病人康复方案的疗效。","authors":"Hui Feng, Xueping Li","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2024.0530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Existing rehabilitation programs for neurological critical patients are based on early mobilization or exercise. However, whether there is an optimal rehabilitation program in terms of its rehabilitation efficacy needs further exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An optimal rehabilitation program for neurological critical patients was developed in July 2020 and evaluated in December 2020. Retrospective data on the duration of the rehabilitation intervention, mortality rate, treatment adverse events (AE), and functional status were collected in the hospital electronic database from January to June 2020. The Manchester Mobility Score (MMS), UK Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength score, and Barthel Index for the ability to perform the activities of daily living were used to evaluate body function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of nonfatal serious AEs was significantly lower in patients treated with the optimized rehabilitation program (1.71% vs. 3.41%), while the rehabilitation time was significantly shorter (23.17±6.99 days vs. 26.34±6.25 days, mean±standard deviation) and there were significant improvements in activity ability (MMS: 10.88±3.31 vs. 7.89±3.31), muscle strength (MRC muscle strength score: 9.56±3.84 vs. 7.84±3.36), and activities of daily living (Barthel Index: 27.36±9.34 vs. 19.47±6.25). Importantly, the nutritional status of the patients was also significantly improved by the optimal program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimized rehabilitation program was superior to the nonoptimized program in decreasing AEs and improving the activity ability, muscle strength, and ability to perform the activities of daily living.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":"21 5","pages":"439-448"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing the Efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program for Neurological Critical Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Feng, Xueping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3988/jcn.2024.0530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Existing rehabilitation programs for neurological critical patients are based on early mobilization or exercise. However, whether there is an optimal rehabilitation program in terms of its rehabilitation efficacy needs further exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An optimal rehabilitation program for neurological critical patients was developed in July 2020 and evaluated in December 2020. Retrospective data on the duration of the rehabilitation intervention, mortality rate, treatment adverse events (AE), and functional status were collected in the hospital electronic database from January to June 2020. The Manchester Mobility Score (MMS), UK Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength score, and Barthel Index for the ability to perform the activities of daily living were used to evaluate body function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of nonfatal serious AEs was significantly lower in patients treated with the optimized rehabilitation program (1.71% vs. 3.41%), while the rehabilitation time was significantly shorter (23.17±6.99 days vs. 26.34±6.25 days, mean±standard deviation) and there were significant improvements in activity ability (MMS: 10.88±3.31 vs. 7.89±3.31), muscle strength (MRC muscle strength score: 9.56±3.84 vs. 7.84±3.36), and activities of daily living (Barthel Index: 27.36±9.34 vs. 19.47±6.25). Importantly, the nutritional status of the patients was also significantly improved by the optimal program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimized rehabilitation program was superior to the nonoptimized program in decreasing AEs and improving the activity ability, muscle strength, and ability to perform the activities of daily living.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"439-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2024.0530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2024.0530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:现有的神经危重患者康复方案是基于早期活动或锻炼。然而,是否存在最优的康复方案,其康复效果有待进一步探讨。方法:2020年7月制定神经系统危重患者最佳康复方案,2020年12月进行评估。从2020年1月至6月在医院电子数据库中收集康复干预持续时间、死亡率、治疗不良事件(AE)和功能状态的回顾性数据。采用曼彻斯特活动能力评分(MMS)、英国医学研究委员会(MRC)肌肉力量评分和Barthel日常生活活动能力指数来评估身体功能。结果:经优化的康复方案治疗的患者非致死性严重不良事件发生率显著降低(1.71% vs. 3.41%),康复时间显著缩短(23.17±6.99 d vs. 26.34±6.25 d,均值±标准差),活动能力(MMS: 10.88±3.31 vs. 7.89±3.31)、肌力(MRC肌力评分:9.56±3.84 vs. 7.84±3.36)、日常生活活动(Barthel指数:27.36±9.34 vs. 19.47±6.25)。重要的是,通过优化方案,患者的营养状况也得到了显著改善。结论:优化后的康复方案在降低ae、提高活动能力、肌力和日常生活活动能力方面优于非优化方案。
Optimizing the Efficacy of a Rehabilitation Program for Neurological Critical Patients.
Background and purpose: Existing rehabilitation programs for neurological critical patients are based on early mobilization or exercise. However, whether there is an optimal rehabilitation program in terms of its rehabilitation efficacy needs further exploration.
Methods: An optimal rehabilitation program for neurological critical patients was developed in July 2020 and evaluated in December 2020. Retrospective data on the duration of the rehabilitation intervention, mortality rate, treatment adverse events (AE), and functional status were collected in the hospital electronic database from January to June 2020. The Manchester Mobility Score (MMS), UK Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength score, and Barthel Index for the ability to perform the activities of daily living were used to evaluate body function.
Results: The incidence of nonfatal serious AEs was significantly lower in patients treated with the optimized rehabilitation program (1.71% vs. 3.41%), while the rehabilitation time was significantly shorter (23.17±6.99 days vs. 26.34±6.25 days, mean±standard deviation) and there were significant improvements in activity ability (MMS: 10.88±3.31 vs. 7.89±3.31), muscle strength (MRC muscle strength score: 9.56±3.84 vs. 7.84±3.36), and activities of daily living (Barthel Index: 27.36±9.34 vs. 19.47±6.25). Importantly, the nutritional status of the patients was also significantly improved by the optimal program.
Conclusions: The optimized rehabilitation program was superior to the nonoptimized program in decreasing AEs and improving the activity ability, muscle strength, and ability to perform the activities of daily living.
期刊介绍:
The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.