胸神经阻滞和椎旁阻滞用于乳房手术术后疼痛管理的比较:一项多中心随机双盲试验。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Roberto Dossi, Edoardo Tasciotti, Kuijk van Sander, Paolo Maino, Vladimir Reyes Lozano, Andrea Saporito, Eva Koetsier
{"title":"胸神经阻滞和椎旁阻滞用于乳房手术术后疼痛管理的比较:一项多中心随机双盲试验。","authors":"Roberto Dossi, Edoardo Tasciotti, Kuijk van Sander, Paolo Maino, Vladimir Reyes Lozano, Andrea Saporito, Eva Koetsier","doi":"10.4048/jbc.2025.0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks have gained popularity for pain management in breast cancer surgery because of their ease of use and lower risk profile. However, their efficacy compared with that of paravertebral block (PVB) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the PECS block to PVB for postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial included adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status 1-3) scheduled for elective breast cancer surgery. The patients were randomized to receive either a PECS block or PVB. The primary outcome was block success, defined as a Visual Analogue Scale pain score of < 30 at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, block performance time, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 42 patients, 23 received a PECS block and 19 received PVB. Successful blocks were achieved in 69.6%, 81.8%, and 77.3% of patients with PECS blocks and 63.2%, 68.4%, and 88.9% of patients with PVB at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours, respectively. The non-inferiority of PECS was significant at 30 minutes and 6 hours but inconclusive at 24 hours. The PECS blocks were performed faster (7 vs. 14 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Opioid consumption, global satisfaction, and functional recovery were comparable with no reported complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that the PECS block is non-inferior to the PVB in managing postoperative pain after breast surgery, offering advantages such as reduced administration time and a favorable safety profile. These findings support the integration of the PECS block into pain management strategies for breast cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02645474.</p>","PeriodicalId":15206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":"28 4","pages":"268-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pectoral Nerve and Paravertebral Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Breast Surgery: A Multicentre Randomised Double-Blind Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Dossi, Edoardo Tasciotti, Kuijk van Sander, Paolo Maino, Vladimir Reyes Lozano, Andrea Saporito, Eva Koetsier\",\"doi\":\"10.4048/jbc.2025.0060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks have gained popularity for pain management in breast cancer surgery because of their ease of use and lower risk profile. However, their efficacy compared with that of paravertebral block (PVB) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the PECS block to PVB for postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial included adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status 1-3) scheduled for elective breast cancer surgery. The patients were randomized to receive either a PECS block or PVB. The primary outcome was block success, defined as a Visual Analogue Scale pain score of < 30 at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, block performance time, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 42 patients, 23 received a PECS block and 19 received PVB. Successful blocks were achieved in 69.6%, 81.8%, and 77.3% of patients with PECS blocks and 63.2%, 68.4%, and 88.9% of patients with PVB at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours, respectively. The non-inferiority of PECS was significant at 30 minutes and 6 hours but inconclusive at 24 hours. The PECS blocks were performed faster (7 vs. 14 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Opioid consumption, global satisfaction, and functional recovery were comparable with no reported complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that the PECS block is non-inferior to the PVB in managing postoperative pain after breast surgery, offering advantages such as reduced administration time and a favorable safety profile. These findings support the integration of the PECS block into pain management strategies for breast cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02645474.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"268-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2025.0060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2025.0060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胸神经(PECS)阻滞因其易于使用和风险较低而在乳腺癌手术中的疼痛管理中越来越受欢迎。然而,与椎旁阻滞(PVB)相比,其疗效尚不确定。本研究旨在评价PECS阻滞对PVB术后镇痛的非劣效性。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验纳入了计划择期乳腺癌手术的成年患者(美国麻醉医师协会身份1-3)。患者随机接受PECS阻滞或PVB。主要结局是阻滞成功,定义为术后30分钟、6小时和24小时的视觉模拟量表疼痛评分< 30。次要结果包括阿片类药物消耗、阻滞时间、功能恢复和患者满意度。结果:42例患者中,23例接受了PECS阻滞,19例接受了PVB。在30分钟、6小时和24小时,PECS阻滞患者的成功率分别为69.6%、81.8%和77.3%,PVB阻滞患者的成功率分别为63.2%、68.4%和88.9%。PECS的非劣效性在30分钟和6小时显著,但在24小时不确定。PECS阻滞更快(7分钟vs. 14分钟,p < 0.001)。阿片类药物消费、总体满意度和功能恢复具有可比性,无并发症报道。结论:我们的研究表明,PECS阻滞在处理乳房手术后疼痛方面不逊色于PVB,具有缩短给药时间和良好的安全性等优势。这些发现支持将PECS阻滞纳入乳腺癌手术疼痛管理策略。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02645474。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Pectoral Nerve and Paravertebral Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Breast Surgery: A Multicentre Randomised Double-Blind Trial.

Comparison of Pectoral Nerve and Paravertebral Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Breast Surgery: A Multicentre Randomised Double-Blind Trial.

Comparison of Pectoral Nerve and Paravertebral Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Breast Surgery: A Multicentre Randomised Double-Blind Trial.

Comparison of Pectoral Nerve and Paravertebral Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Breast Surgery: A Multicentre Randomised Double-Blind Trial.

Purpose: Pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks have gained popularity for pain management in breast cancer surgery because of their ease of use and lower risk profile. However, their efficacy compared with that of paravertebral block (PVB) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the PECS block to PVB for postoperative analgesia.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial included adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status 1-3) scheduled for elective breast cancer surgery. The patients were randomized to receive either a PECS block or PVB. The primary outcome was block success, defined as a Visual Analogue Scale pain score of < 30 at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, block performance time, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Of the 42 patients, 23 received a PECS block and 19 received PVB. Successful blocks were achieved in 69.6%, 81.8%, and 77.3% of patients with PECS blocks and 63.2%, 68.4%, and 88.9% of patients with PVB at 30 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours, respectively. The non-inferiority of PECS was significant at 30 minutes and 6 hours but inconclusive at 24 hours. The PECS blocks were performed faster (7 vs. 14 minutes, p < 0.001). Opioid consumption, global satisfaction, and functional recovery were comparable with no reported complications.

Conclusion: Our study shows that the PECS block is non-inferior to the PVB in managing postoperative pain after breast surgery, offering advantages such as reduced administration time and a favorable safety profile. These findings support the integration of the PECS block into pain management strategies for breast cancer surgery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02645474.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Breast Cancer (abbreviated as ''J Breast Cancer'') is the official journal of the Korean Breast Cancer Society, which is issued quarterly in the last day of March, June, September, and December each year since 1998. All the contents of the Journal is available online at the official journal website (http://ejbc.kr) under open access policy. The journal aims to provide a forum for the academic communication between medical doctors, basic science researchers, and health care professionals to be interested in breast cancer. To get this aim, we publish original investigations, review articles, brief communications including case reports, editorial opinions on the topics of importance to breast cancer, and welcome new research findings and epidemiological studies, especially when they contain a regional data to grab the international reader''s interest. Although the journal is mainly dealing with the issues of breast cancer, rare cases among benign breast diseases or evidence-based scientifically written articles providing useful information for clinical practice can be published as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信