{"title":"非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中传输时间血流测定:两种不同吻合技术的早期结果。","authors":"Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Shahboz Buranov, Farkhod Mamataliev, Saidjalol Tursunov, Mustapha Obeid, Ulugbek Ganiev","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"128-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative transit time flowmetry during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Early outcome of two different anastomosis technique.\",\"authors\":\"Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Shahboz Buranov, Farkhod Mamataliev, Saidjalol Tursunov, Mustapha Obeid, Ulugbek Ganiev\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"128-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraoperative transit time flowmetry during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Early outcome of two different anastomosis technique.
Introduction: Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.
Methods: A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.
Results: Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.
Conclusion: TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.