非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中传输时间血流测定:两种不同吻合技术的早期结果。

IF 0.7 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research Pub Date : 2025-06-28 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244
Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Shahboz Buranov, Farkhod Mamataliev, Saidjalol Tursunov, Mustapha Obeid, Ulugbek Ganiev
{"title":"非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中传输时间血流测定:两种不同吻合技术的早期结果。","authors":"Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Shahboz Buranov, Farkhod Mamataliev, Saidjalol Tursunov, Mustapha Obeid, Ulugbek Ganiev","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"128-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative transit time flowmetry during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Early outcome of two different anastomosis technique.\",\"authors\":\"Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Shahboz Buranov, Farkhod Mamataliev, Saidjalol Tursunov, Mustapha Obeid, Ulugbek Ganiev\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"128-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术中过渡时间血流法(TTF)是非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCABG)中评估移植物功能的重要技术。本研究比较了两种手术入路:序贯式和y型隐静脉移植术中TTF的移植物质量和结果。方法:将120例三支冠状动脉病变患者随机分为两组:第一组(n=60)接受序贯移植;第二组(n=60)接受y型移植物。术中测量平均移植物流量(MGF)和脉搏指数(PI)。根据血流>15 ml/min和PI对移植物功能进行分类结果:术中TTF显示移植物类型间MGF或PI无显著差异,尽管顺序移植物表现出稍高的血流和较低的阻力。术中移植物失败的发生率为1.7%(顺序),而y型移植物失败的发生率为3.3%。随访48个月,序贯移植物通畅率为100%,而y型移植物闭塞率为7.0%。多变量分析发现血管直径和导管类型是移植物性能的重要预测因素;嫁接结构(顺序vs. Y)不能独立预测。结论:TTF是OPCABG术中保证移植物功能的一种有价值的工具。虽然这两种技术都是可行的,但序贯移植术表现出较好的中期通畅性和较低的失败率。这些发现支持在解剖可行的情况下优先使用顺序移植,并强调常规TTF对优化手术结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative transit time flowmetry during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Early outcome of two different anastomosis technique.

Introduction: Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.

Methods: A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.

Results: Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.

Conclusion: TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信