Moussa Nassar, Mohamed I Mohamed, Maryam Shahid, Rama Taha, Rashed W Alweshah, Marwa R Yousef, Yousra Eltagouri, Diaz G Gustavo
{"title":"烧伤局部使用肝素:随机对照研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Moussa Nassar, Mohamed I Mohamed, Maryam Shahid, Rama Taha, Rashed W Alweshah, Marwa R Yousef, Yousra Eltagouri, Diaz G Gustavo","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burns are associated with significant inflammation and pain. Topical agents like heparin can modulate these processes and improve outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using topical heparin (TH) in patients with burns. On August 7, 2024, we conducted a literature search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only randomized controlled studies were included. Data were extracted on analgesic drug usage, bleeding events, sepsis, visual analog scale pain scores, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1). heterogeneous data. Seven RCTs (503 patients; TH: 249, Control: 254) were included. Analgesic use (1-2 times/day: RR = 3.04, p = 0.68; 3-4 times/day: RR = 0.06, p = 0.18), bleeding (RR = 5.06, p = 0.37), sepsis (RR = 0.77, p = 0.40), hospital stay, and mortality (RR = 0.13, p = 0.90) showed no significant differences. TH reduced local wound infections by 60% (RR = 0.40, p < 0.01) and lowered VAS pain scores (MD = -3.34, p < 0.01). However, sensitivity analysis excluding an outlier nullified the pain reduction (MD = -4.17, p = 0.57). All studies had a high risk of bias, especially in outcome measurement and randomization. Topical heparin reduces pain and local wound infections in burn patients without having an impact on other outcomes. Evidence is limited by a high risk of bias. Well-designed randomized trials are needed to determine its broader clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical Heparin in Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Moussa Nassar, Mohamed I Mohamed, Maryam Shahid, Rama Taha, Rashed W Alweshah, Marwa R Yousef, Yousra Eltagouri, Diaz G Gustavo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burns are associated with significant inflammation and pain. Topical agents like heparin can modulate these processes and improve outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using topical heparin (TH) in patients with burns. On August 7, 2024, we conducted a literature search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only randomized controlled studies were included. Data were extracted on analgesic drug usage, bleeding events, sepsis, visual analog scale pain scores, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1). heterogeneous data. Seven RCTs (503 patients; TH: 249, Control: 254) were included. Analgesic use (1-2 times/day: RR = 3.04, p = 0.68; 3-4 times/day: RR = 0.06, p = 0.18), bleeding (RR = 5.06, p = 0.37), sepsis (RR = 0.77, p = 0.40), hospital stay, and mortality (RR = 0.13, p = 0.90) showed no significant differences. TH reduced local wound infections by 60% (RR = 0.40, p < 0.01) and lowered VAS pain scores (MD = -3.34, p < 0.01). However, sensitivity analysis excluding an outlier nullified the pain reduction (MD = -4.17, p = 0.57). All studies had a high risk of bias, especially in outcome measurement and randomization. Topical heparin reduces pain and local wound infections in burn patients without having an impact on other outcomes. Evidence is limited by a high risk of bias. Well-designed randomized trials are needed to determine its broader clinical value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
烧伤伴随着明显的炎症和疼痛。像肝素这样的局部药物可以调节这些过程并改善结果。我们的研究目的是评估在烧伤患者中使用局部肝素(TH)的有效性。在2024年8月7日,我们对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行了文献检索。仅纳入随机对照研究。提取镇痛药物使用、出血事件、败血症、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、住院时间和死亡率等数据。采用R软件(4.4.1版)进行统计分析。异构数据。纳入7项rct(503例患者,TH 249例,Control 254例)。镇痛药使用(1-2次/天:RR = 3.04, p = 0.68; 3-4次/天:RR = 0.06, p = 0.18)、出血(RR = 5.06, p = 0.37)、败血症(RR = 0.77, p = 0.40)、住院时间、死亡率(RR = 0.13, p = 0.90)差异无统计学意义。TH降低了60%的局部伤口感染(RR = 0.40, p < 0.01),降低了VAS疼痛评分(MD = -3.34, p < 0.01)。然而,排除异常值的敏感性分析使疼痛减轻无效(MD = -4.17, p = 0.57)。所有的研究都有较高的偏倚风险,特别是在结果测量和随机化方面。局部肝素可减轻烧伤患者的疼痛和局部伤口感染,而对其他预后没有影响。证据受到高偏倚风险的限制。需要精心设计的随机试验来确定其更广泛的临床价值。
Topical Heparin in Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.
Burns are associated with significant inflammation and pain. Topical agents like heparin can modulate these processes and improve outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using topical heparin (TH) in patients with burns. On August 7, 2024, we conducted a literature search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only randomized controlled studies were included. Data were extracted on analgesic drug usage, bleeding events, sepsis, visual analog scale pain scores, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1). heterogeneous data. Seven RCTs (503 patients; TH: 249, Control: 254) were included. Analgesic use (1-2 times/day: RR = 3.04, p = 0.68; 3-4 times/day: RR = 0.06, p = 0.18), bleeding (RR = 5.06, p = 0.37), sepsis (RR = 0.77, p = 0.40), hospital stay, and mortality (RR = 0.13, p = 0.90) showed no significant differences. TH reduced local wound infections by 60% (RR = 0.40, p < 0.01) and lowered VAS pain scores (MD = -3.34, p < 0.01). However, sensitivity analysis excluding an outlier nullified the pain reduction (MD = -4.17, p = 0.57). All studies had a high risk of bias, especially in outcome measurement and randomization. Topical heparin reduces pain and local wound infections in burn patients without having an impact on other outcomes. Evidence is limited by a high risk of bias. Well-designed randomized trials are needed to determine its broader clinical value.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.