简短交流:北美家族性乳糜小铁血症综合征评分与Balance研究患者的阳性遗传诊断高度一致。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alan S Brown, Philippe Moulin, Andrew Dibble, Veronica J Alexander, Lu Li, Daniel Gaudet, Joseph L Witztum, Sotirios Tsimikas, Robert A Hegele
{"title":"简短交流:北美家族性乳糜小铁血症综合征评分与Balance研究患者的阳性遗传诊断高度一致。","authors":"Alan S Brown, Philippe Moulin, Andrew Dibble, Veronica J Alexander, Lu Li, Daniel Gaudet, Joseph L Witztum, Sotirios Tsimikas, Robert A Hegele","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) are often misdiagnosed. A positive genetic diagnosis is considered definitive, but clinical scoring systems can also identify affected patients. The North American FCS (NAFCS) Score is intended to identify patients likely to have positive DNA testing, but its sensitivity has not been quantified.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate NAFCS Scores in patients from the Balance study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated NAFCS Scores in 66 patients with genetically confirmed FCS from the Balance study of olezarsen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 95.5% (63/66) and 74.2% (49/66) of patients had NAFCS Scores ≥45 (\"likely FCS\") and ≥60 (\"definite FCS\"), respectively. In contrast, no patient had a score <30 (\"unlikely FCS\"), while 4.5% (3/66) had scores between 30 and 44 (\"uncertain FCS\").</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strong concordance between NAFCS Score ≥45 and a positive genetic diagnosis of FCS suggests that either approach can be used for diagnosis except in \"uncertain FCS\" cases, which require genetic testing. The score might also clinically support an FCS diagnosis when genetic testing is indeterminate due to variants of unknown significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief communication: Strong concordance of the North American Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome Score with a positive genetic diagnosis in patients from the Balance study.\",\"authors\":\"Alan S Brown, Philippe Moulin, Andrew Dibble, Veronica J Alexander, Lu Li, Daniel Gaudet, Joseph L Witztum, Sotirios Tsimikas, Robert A Hegele\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) are often misdiagnosed. A positive genetic diagnosis is considered definitive, but clinical scoring systems can also identify affected patients. The North American FCS (NAFCS) Score is intended to identify patients likely to have positive DNA testing, but its sensitivity has not been quantified.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate NAFCS Scores in patients from the Balance study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated NAFCS Scores in 66 patients with genetically confirmed FCS from the Balance study of olezarsen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 95.5% (63/66) and 74.2% (49/66) of patients had NAFCS Scores ≥45 (\\\"likely FCS\\\") and ≥60 (\\\"definite FCS\\\"), respectively. In contrast, no patient had a score <30 (\\\"unlikely FCS\\\"), while 4.5% (3/66) had scores between 30 and 44 (\\\"uncertain FCS\\\").</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strong concordance between NAFCS Score ≥45 and a positive genetic diagnosis of FCS suggests that either approach can be used for diagnosis except in \\\"uncertain FCS\\\" cases, which require genetic testing. The score might also clinically support an FCS diagnosis when genetic testing is indeterminate due to variants of unknown significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical lipidology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征(FCS)患者经常被误诊。阳性的基因诊断被认为是确定的,但临床评分系统也可以识别受影响的患者。北美FCS (NAFCS)评分旨在识别DNA检测可能呈阳性的患者,但其敏感性尚未量化。目的:评价Balance研究患者NAFCS评分。方法:我们计算了olezarsen平衡研究中66例遗传证实的FCS患者的NAFCS评分。结果:95.5%(63/66)和74.2%(49/66)的患者NAFCS评分≥45(“可能的FCS”)和≥60(“明确的FCS”)。结论:NAFCS评分≥45与FCS阳性遗传诊断之间的高度一致性表明,除了需要进行基因检测的“不确定FCS”病例外,任何一种方法都可以用于诊断。当基因检测由于未知意义的变异而无法确定时,该评分也可能在临床上支持FCS诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief communication: Strong concordance of the North American Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome Score with a positive genetic diagnosis in patients from the Balance study.

Background: Patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) are often misdiagnosed. A positive genetic diagnosis is considered definitive, but clinical scoring systems can also identify affected patients. The North American FCS (NAFCS) Score is intended to identify patients likely to have positive DNA testing, but its sensitivity has not been quantified.

Objective: To evaluate NAFCS Scores in patients from the Balance study.

Methods: We calculated NAFCS Scores in 66 patients with genetically confirmed FCS from the Balance study of olezarsen.

Results: We found that 95.5% (63/66) and 74.2% (49/66) of patients had NAFCS Scores ≥45 ("likely FCS") and ≥60 ("definite FCS"), respectively. In contrast, no patient had a score <30 ("unlikely FCS"), while 4.5% (3/66) had scores between 30 and 44 ("uncertain FCS").

Conclusion: The strong concordance between NAFCS Score ≥45 and a positive genetic diagnosis of FCS suggests that either approach can be used for diagnosis except in "uncertain FCS" cases, which require genetic testing. The score might also clinically support an FCS diagnosis when genetic testing is indeterminate due to variants of unknown significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信