两性霉素B脂质体、泊沙康唑和米卡芬净用于小儿急性白血病初级抗真菌预防的比较研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anna Sophia Gottschlich, Jana Ernst, Till Milde, Bernd Gruhn
{"title":"两性霉素B脂质体、泊沙康唑和米卡芬净用于小儿急性白血病初级抗真菌预防的比较研究。","authors":"Anna Sophia Gottschlich, Jana Ernst, Till Milde, Bernd Gruhn","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06289-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies including acute leukemia. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), posaconazole or micafungin as primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study enrolled 95 pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 70) or acute myeloid leukemia (n = 25), undergoing chemotherapy, including those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. PAP regimens included L-AMB (1 mg/kg/day or 3 mg/kg twice weekly, intravenously), posaconazole (100-300 mg/day, according to blood concentration, orally or intravenously) and micafungin (1 mg/kg/day or 3 mg/kg twice weekly, intravenously). Thirty-four patients (35.8%) received L-AMB, 37 patients (38.9%) received posaconazole, and 24 patients (25.3%) received micafungin. Patients with a history of IFD or concurrent or changing PAP were excluded. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of breakthrough IFD, while secondary endpoint included IFD-free survival. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Gray's test and Cox regression to evaluate IFD-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of IFD was 14.7% (14 of 95 patients). IFD developed in 10 of 33 patients (29.4%) receiving L-AMB, in 4 of 38 (10.8%) patients receiving posaconazole and in none of the patients receiving micafungin. IFD-free survival was 70.6% in the L-AMB group, 89.2% in the posaconazole group and 100% in the micafungin group (p = 0.005, log-rank test). Significant differences were also observed in the cumulative incidences of breakthrough IFDs (p = 0.006) assessed by Gray's test. In multivariate Cox analysis, dichotomized prophylaxis regimes (posaconazole or micafungin vs. L-AMB) were independently associated with a reduced risk of IFD (HR = 0.244; 95% CI 0.076-0.777; p = 0.017). Age ≥ 10 years predicted inferior IFD-free survival (HR = 3.665; 95% CI 1.224-10.980; p = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant difference in efficacy between the three antifungal prophylaxis regimens. In our study, micafungin achieved the lowest IFD breakthrough rate. However, multicenter clinical studies would be needed to confirm the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 8","pages":"235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of liposomal amphotericin B, posaconazole, and micafungin for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Sophia Gottschlich, Jana Ernst, Till Milde, Bernd Gruhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06289-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies including acute leukemia. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), posaconazole or micafungin as primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study enrolled 95 pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 70) or acute myeloid leukemia (n = 25), undergoing chemotherapy, including those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. PAP regimens included L-AMB (1 mg/kg/day or 3 mg/kg twice weekly, intravenously), posaconazole (100-300 mg/day, according to blood concentration, orally or intravenously) and micafungin (1 mg/kg/day or 3 mg/kg twice weekly, intravenously). Thirty-four patients (35.8%) received L-AMB, 37 patients (38.9%) received posaconazole, and 24 patients (25.3%) received micafungin. Patients with a history of IFD or concurrent or changing PAP were excluded. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of breakthrough IFD, while secondary endpoint included IFD-free survival. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Gray's test and Cox regression to evaluate IFD-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of IFD was 14.7% (14 of 95 patients). IFD developed in 10 of 33 patients (29.4%) receiving L-AMB, in 4 of 38 (10.8%) patients receiving posaconazole and in none of the patients receiving micafungin. IFD-free survival was 70.6% in the L-AMB group, 89.2% in the posaconazole group and 100% in the micafungin group (p = 0.005, log-rank test). Significant differences were also observed in the cumulative incidences of breakthrough IFDs (p = 0.006) assessed by Gray's test. In multivariate Cox analysis, dichotomized prophylaxis regimes (posaconazole or micafungin vs. L-AMB) were independently associated with a reduced risk of IFD (HR = 0.244; 95% CI 0.076-0.777; p = 0.017). Age ≥ 10 years predicted inferior IFD-free survival (HR = 3.665; 95% CI 1.224-10.980; p = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant difference in efficacy between the three antifungal prophylaxis regimens. In our study, micafungin achieved the lowest IFD breakthrough rate. However, multicenter clinical studies would be needed to confirm the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 8\",\"pages\":\"235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374918/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06289-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06289-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:侵袭性真菌病(IFDs)是包括急性白血病在内的儿童血液系统恶性肿瘤患者发病和死亡的重要原因。本研究旨在比较两性霉素B (L-AMB)脂质体、泊沙康唑或米卡芬净作为儿科急性白血病患者一级抗真菌预防(PAP)的疗效。方法:本回顾性观察性研究纳入95例接受化疗的急性淋巴细胞白血病(n = 70)或急性髓系白血病(n = 25)患儿,包括在德国耶拿大学医院儿科接受同种异体造血干细胞移植的患儿。PAP方案包括L-AMB (1mg /kg/天或3mg /kg每周两次,静脉注射),泊沙康唑(100- 300mg /天,根据血药浓度,口服或静脉注射)和米卡芬金(1mg /kg/天或3mg /kg每周两次,静脉注射)。L-AMB 34例(35.8%),泊沙康唑37例(38.9%),米卡芬新24例(25.3%)。排除有IFD病史或同时或改变PAP的患者。主要终点是突破性IFD的发生,次要终点包括无IFD生存期。统计学分析采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析、Gray检验和Cox回归评价无ifd生存。结果:IFD的总发病率为14.7%(14 / 95)。接受L-AMB治疗的33例患者中有10例(29.4%)发生IFD,接受泊沙康唑治疗的38例患者中有4例(10.8%)发生IFD,接受米卡芬新治疗的患者中没有发生IFD。L-AMB组无ifd生存率为70.6%,泊沙康唑组为89.2%,米卡芬金组为100% (p = 0.005, log-rank检验)。格雷检验评估的突破性ifd的累积发生率也有显著差异(p = 0.006)。在多变量Cox分析中,二分类预防方案(泊沙康唑或米卡芬净vs. L-AMB)与IFD风险降低独立相关(HR = 0.244; 95% CI 0.076-0.777; p = 0.017)。年龄≥10岁预测较差的无ifd生存(HR = 3.665; 95% CI 1.224-10.980; p = 0.020)。结论:我们发现三种抗真菌预防方案的疗效有显著差异。在我们的研究中,micafungin达到了最低的IFD突破率。然而,需要多中心临床研究来证实结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative study of liposomal amphotericin B, posaconazole, and micafungin for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.

Comparative study of liposomal amphotericin B, posaconazole, and micafungin for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.

Comparative study of liposomal amphotericin B, posaconazole, and micafungin for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.

Purpose: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies including acute leukemia. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), posaconazole or micafungin as primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.

Methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled 95 pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 70) or acute myeloid leukemia (n = 25), undergoing chemotherapy, including those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. PAP regimens included L-AMB (1 mg/kg/day or 3 mg/kg twice weekly, intravenously), posaconazole (100-300 mg/day, according to blood concentration, orally or intravenously) and micafungin (1 mg/kg/day or 3 mg/kg twice weekly, intravenously). Thirty-four patients (35.8%) received L-AMB, 37 patients (38.9%) received posaconazole, and 24 patients (25.3%) received micafungin. Patients with a history of IFD or concurrent or changing PAP were excluded. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of breakthrough IFD, while secondary endpoint included IFD-free survival. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Gray's test and Cox regression to evaluate IFD-free survival.

Results: The overall incidence of IFD was 14.7% (14 of 95 patients). IFD developed in 10 of 33 patients (29.4%) receiving L-AMB, in 4 of 38 (10.8%) patients receiving posaconazole and in none of the patients receiving micafungin. IFD-free survival was 70.6% in the L-AMB group, 89.2% in the posaconazole group and 100% in the micafungin group (p = 0.005, log-rank test). Significant differences were also observed in the cumulative incidences of breakthrough IFDs (p = 0.006) assessed by Gray's test. In multivariate Cox analysis, dichotomized prophylaxis regimes (posaconazole or micafungin vs. L-AMB) were independently associated with a reduced risk of IFD (HR = 0.244; 95% CI 0.076-0.777; p = 0.017). Age ≥ 10 years predicted inferior IFD-free survival (HR = 3.665; 95% CI 1.224-10.980; p = 0.020).

Conclusion: We found a significant difference in efficacy between the three antifungal prophylaxis regimens. In our study, micafungin achieved the lowest IFD breakthrough rate. However, multicenter clinical studies would be needed to confirm the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信