大麻素对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的抗生物膜活性。

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Pancy Tsz Hei Kwong, Theerthankar Das, Jonathon Carl Arnold, Hak-Kim Chan, Philip Chi Lip Kwok
{"title":"大麻素对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的抗生物膜活性。","authors":"Pancy Tsz Hei Kwong, Theerthankar Das, Jonathon Carl Arnold, Hak-Kim Chan, Philip Chi Lip Kwok","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxaf214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia with resistance against beta-lactam antibiotics. New, potent antibiotics against MRSA with other mechanisms of action are thus urgently needed. Recently, cannabinoids have been evaluated for antimicrobial activity in the ongoing search for new anti-infective agents, but their anti-biofilm effect has not been extensively studied. In this study, five main phytocannabinoids-cannabidiol (CBD), delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBN), cannabigerol (CBG), and cannabichromene (CBC) were examined for their activity against MRSA biofilms.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The anti-biofilm activity was assessed by crystal violet staining, resazurin metabolic assay, reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, and propidium iodide membrane integrity test. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of all tested cannabinoids were between 1 and 2 µg/mL. CBN showed the most potent anti-MRSA biofilm activity, significantly reducing biofilm biomass and bacterial viability. It also induced the highest intracellular ROS levels. In contrast, CBD was the least effective among the tested cannabinoids in most of the anti-biofilm assays, yet it caused the greatest membrane damage to bacteria within the biofilm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that despite being chemically similar, the cannabinoids demonstrated different potency and potentially different mechanisms of action against MRSA. More research is needed to investigate how they act on this pathogen and its biofilm.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anti-biofilm activity of cannabinoids against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.\",\"authors\":\"Pancy Tsz Hei Kwong, Theerthankar Das, Jonathon Carl Arnold, Hak-Kim Chan, Philip Chi Lip Kwok\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jambio/lxaf214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia with resistance against beta-lactam antibiotics. New, potent antibiotics against MRSA with other mechanisms of action are thus urgently needed. Recently, cannabinoids have been evaluated for antimicrobial activity in the ongoing search for new anti-infective agents, but their anti-biofilm effect has not been extensively studied. In this study, five main phytocannabinoids-cannabidiol (CBD), delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBN), cannabigerol (CBG), and cannabichromene (CBC) were examined for their activity against MRSA biofilms.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The anti-biofilm activity was assessed by crystal violet staining, resazurin metabolic assay, reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, and propidium iodide membrane integrity test. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of all tested cannabinoids were between 1 and 2 µg/mL. CBN showed the most potent anti-MRSA biofilm activity, significantly reducing biofilm biomass and bacterial viability. It also induced the highest intracellular ROS levels. In contrast, CBD was the least effective among the tested cannabinoids in most of the anti-biofilm assays, yet it caused the greatest membrane damage to bacteria within the biofilm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that despite being chemically similar, the cannabinoids demonstrated different potency and potentially different mechanisms of action against MRSA. More research is needed to investigate how they act on this pathogen and its biofilm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxaf214\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxaf214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是医院获得性肺炎的主要原因,对β -内酰胺类抗生素具有耐药性。因此,迫切需要具有其他作用机制的抗MRSA的新型强效抗生素。近年来,大麻素已被评价为抗菌活性,正在寻找新的抗感染药物,但其抗生物膜的作用还没有广泛的研究。在这项研究中,研究了五种主要的植物大麻素-大麻二酚(CBD), δ -9-四氢大麻酚(THC),大麻酚(CBN),大麻酚(CBG)和大麻色素(CBC)对MRSA生物膜的活性。方法与结果:采用结晶紫染色法、瑞祖林代谢法、活性氧(ROS)法和碘化丙啶膜完整性法测定其抗生物膜活性。所有测试大麻素的最低抑制浓度在1-2µg/mL之间。CBN抗mrsa生物膜活性最强,显著降低生物膜生物量和细菌活力。它还诱导了最高的细胞内ROS水平。相比之下,在大多数抗生物膜试验中,CBD是被测大麻素中效果最差的,但它对生物膜内细菌的膜损伤最大。结论:本研究表明,尽管化学成分相似,但大麻素对MRSA的效力和作用机制可能不同。需要更多的研究来研究它们如何作用于这种病原体及其生物膜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The anti-biofilm activity of cannabinoids against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Aims: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia with resistance against beta-lactam antibiotics. New, potent antibiotics against MRSA with other mechanisms of action are thus urgently needed. Recently, cannabinoids have been evaluated for antimicrobial activity in the ongoing search for new anti-infective agents, but their anti-biofilm effect has not been extensively studied. In this study, five main phytocannabinoids-cannabidiol (CBD), delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBN), cannabigerol (CBG), and cannabichromene (CBC) were examined for their activity against MRSA biofilms.

Methods and results: The anti-biofilm activity was assessed by crystal violet staining, resazurin metabolic assay, reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, and propidium iodide membrane integrity test. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of all tested cannabinoids were between 1 and 2 µg/mL. CBN showed the most potent anti-MRSA biofilm activity, significantly reducing biofilm biomass and bacterial viability. It also induced the highest intracellular ROS levels. In contrast, CBD was the least effective among the tested cannabinoids in most of the anti-biofilm assays, yet it caused the greatest membrane damage to bacteria within the biofilm.

Conclusions: This study showed that despite being chemically similar, the cannabinoids demonstrated different potency and potentially different mechanisms of action against MRSA. More research is needed to investigate how they act on this pathogen and its biofilm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Journal of Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信