Patrik U Andersson, Jim Clay, Mark Parry, Teresa Iley, Daryl L Roberts, Lois Slator, Mårten Svensson, Hlack Mohammed, Jolyon P Mitchell
{"title":"对市售混合入口药物内部损失的多参与者盲法调查:按照药典方法测试不同的口服吸入产品类别。","authors":"Patrik U Andersson, Jim Clay, Mark Parry, Teresa Iley, Daryl L Roberts, Lois Slator, Mårten Svensson, Hlack Mohammed, Jolyon P Mitchell","doi":"10.1177/19412711251370473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The \"Miller\" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. <b><i>Study Purpose:</i></b> As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Patrik U Andersson, Jim Clay, Mark Parry, Teresa Iley, Daryl L Roberts, Lois Slator, Mårten Svensson, Hlack Mohammed, Jolyon P Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19412711251370473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The \\\"Miller\\\" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. <b><i>Study Purpose:</i></b> As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711251370473\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711251370473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods.
Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. Study Purpose: As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Methods: Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Results: Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. Conclusions: MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes:
Pulmonary drug delivery
Airway reactivity and asthma treatment
Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract
Toxic effects of inhaled agents
Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.