对市售混合入口药物内部损失的多参与者盲法调查:按照药典方法测试不同的口服吸入产品类别。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Patrik U Andersson, Jim Clay, Mark Parry, Teresa Iley, Daryl L Roberts, Lois Slator, Mårten Svensson, Hlack Mohammed, Jolyon P Mitchell
{"title":"对市售混合入口药物内部损失的多参与者盲法调查:按照药典方法测试不同的口服吸入产品类别。","authors":"Patrik U Andersson, Jim Clay, Mark Parry, Teresa Iley, Daryl L Roberts, Lois Slator, Mårten Svensson, Hlack Mohammed, Jolyon P Mitchell","doi":"10.1177/19412711251370473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The \"Miller\" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. <b><i>Study Purpose:</i></b> As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Patrik U Andersson, Jim Clay, Mark Parry, Teresa Iley, Daryl L Roberts, Lois Slator, Mårten Svensson, Hlack Mohammed, Jolyon P Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19412711251370473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The \\\"Miller\\\" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. <b><i>Study Purpose:</i></b> As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711251370473\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711251370473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:混合入口(MI)的“米勒”设计使级联冲击器能够以恒定的流速运行,同时通过控制通过其侧臂的空气流量来评估口服吸入的测试产品在不同的流速下。研究目的:作为欧洲药物气溶胶组(EPAG)影响者亚组的一部分,我们报告了一项由五个组织进行的跨行业实验调查,以确定不同吸入器产生的雾化药物在市售MIs中的内部损失,重点关注产品测试的药理学方法。方法:对加压计量吸入器(pmdi)、被动干粉吸入器(DPIs)、压缩空气喷射和振动网状雾化器输送的溶液和悬浮液配方进行评价。在进入MI侧臂的不同恒定空气流速下,评估了四种不同的设备。使用呼吸模拟器生成的可变成人流剖面对雾化器进行了测试。结论:心肌梗死损失评估应被视为方法开发的重要组成部分,以尽量减少所取样雾化药物的内部损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods.

Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. Study Purpose: As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Methods: Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Results: Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. Conclusions: MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信