真空辅助分娩初产妇产后9-12个月肛门失禁的患病率及预测因素。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov
{"title":"真空辅助分娩初产妇产后9-12个月肛门失禁的患病率及预测因素。","authors":"Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06290-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>We have examined prospectively a large cohort of primipara with VA deliveries and previously reported that approximately one in five had an anal sphincter injury of which one quarter were clinically unrecognized. In this paper, we examine the development and potential predictors of postpartum anal incontinence (AI) in the cohort. We hypothesized that both clinically recognized and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries would be associated with AI development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were interviewed 9-12 months postpartum using the St. Marks incontinence score (SMIS). The primary outcome was the prevalence of de novo AI development defined as SMIS > 0. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were initially included in the study and 248 of them (92%) completed the interview. The prevalence of de novo AI was 21.8% (95% CI 16.4-28.4). Both clinically recognized and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries increased the odds significantly about threefold. Only 35.2% of the symptomatic women had a sphincter injury, and we identified no predictors in the rest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately one in five primipara undergoing a VA delivery developed AI. About one third of them were associated with either a clinically recognized or unrecognized anal sphincter injury. Thus, the combination of the two provides the most clinically relevant distinction between anal sphincter injury dependent and independent predictors of AI development. In the symptomatic women with no sphincter injuries, we found no predictive variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Incontinence 9-12 Months Postpartum in Primipara with Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries.\",\"authors\":\"Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-025-06290-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>We have examined prospectively a large cohort of primipara with VA deliveries and previously reported that approximately one in five had an anal sphincter injury of which one quarter were clinically unrecognized. In this paper, we examine the development and potential predictors of postpartum anal incontinence (AI) in the cohort. We hypothesized that both clinically recognized and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries would be associated with AI development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were interviewed 9-12 months postpartum using the St. Marks incontinence score (SMIS). The primary outcome was the prevalence of de novo AI development defined as SMIS > 0. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were initially included in the study and 248 of them (92%) completed the interview. The prevalence of de novo AI was 21.8% (95% CI 16.4-28.4). Both clinically recognized and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries increased the odds significantly about threefold. Only 35.2% of the symptomatic women had a sphincter injury, and we identified no predictors in the rest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately one in five primipara undergoing a VA delivery developed AI. About one third of them were associated with either a clinically recognized or unrecognized anal sphincter injury. Thus, the combination of the two provides the most clinically relevant distinction between anal sphincter injury dependent and independent predictors of AI development. In the symptomatic women with no sphincter injuries, we found no predictive variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06290-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06290-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和假设:我们前瞻性地研究了一大批VA分娩的初产妇,之前的报道称,大约五分之一的人有肛门括约肌损伤,其中四分之一的人在临床上未被发现。在本文中,我们研究了队列中产后肛门失禁(AI)的发展和潜在预测因素。我们假设临床识别和未识别的肛门括约肌损伤都与AI的发展有关。方法:使用St. Marks失禁评分(SMIS)对产后9-12个月的参与者进行访谈。主要结局是人工智能发展的发生率,定义为SMIS bb0 0。采用Logistic回归分析计算所选变量的比值比。结果:在334名符合条件的女性中,271名(81%)最初被纳入研究,其中248名(92%)完成了访谈。新发AI患病率为21.8% (95% CI 16.4-28.4)。临床发现的和未发现的肛门括约肌损伤的几率都增加了三倍。只有35.2%的有症状的女性有括约肌损伤,我们没有发现其他的预测因素。结论:大约五分之一的初产妇在接受VA分娩时发生了AI。其中约三分之一与临床公认或未被公认的肛门括约肌损伤有关。因此,两者的结合提供了肛门括约肌损伤依赖和独立的AI发展预测因子之间最具临床相关性的区别。在没有括约肌损伤的有症状的女性中,我们没有发现预测变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Incontinence 9-12 Months Postpartum in Primipara with Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries.

Introduction and hypothesis: We have examined prospectively a large cohort of primipara with VA deliveries and previously reported that approximately one in five had an anal sphincter injury of which one quarter were clinically unrecognized. In this paper, we examine the development and potential predictors of postpartum anal incontinence (AI) in the cohort. We hypothesized that both clinically recognized and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries would be associated with AI development.

Methods: The participants were interviewed 9-12 months postpartum using the St. Marks incontinence score (SMIS). The primary outcome was the prevalence of de novo AI development defined as SMIS > 0. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.

Results: Of 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were initially included in the study and 248 of them (92%) completed the interview. The prevalence of de novo AI was 21.8% (95% CI 16.4-28.4). Both clinically recognized and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries increased the odds significantly about threefold. Only 35.2% of the symptomatic women had a sphincter injury, and we identified no predictors in the rest.

Conclusions: Approximately one in five primipara undergoing a VA delivery developed AI. About one third of them were associated with either a clinically recognized or unrecognized anal sphincter injury. Thus, the combination of the two provides the most clinically relevant distinction between anal sphincter injury dependent and independent predictors of AI development. In the symptomatic women with no sphincter injuries, we found no predictive variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信