盆腔器官脱垂妇女必要治疗对生活质量、症状、性功能和泌尿系统的长期影响

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ozgen Nahya Ozdogar, Ibrahim Egemen Ertas
{"title":"盆腔器官脱垂妇女必要治疗对生活质量、症状、性功能和泌尿系统的长期影响","authors":"Ozgen Nahya Ozdogar, Ibrahim Egemen Ertas","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06291-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Although pessary treatment is widely used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP), there is currently no clear information on its impact on long-term quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pessary treatment on quality of life (QoL), symptoms, sexual function, and the urinary system in women with POP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who presented to our clinic due to POP and were treated with a pessary were evaluated. To examine the effects of pessary treatment on QoL, the urinary system, and sexual function, validated questionnaires, including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), were completed by those who continued to receive pessary treatment. The patients' gynecological examinations were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were enrolled in the study. Four patients died owing to systemic comorbidities. Among the remaining patients, 12 discontinued pessary use (mean duration 27.36 months), while 54 continued the treatment (mean duration 25.43 months). The pessary size, total vaginal length (TVL), and genital hiatus (GH) of women with POP who discontinued treatment were greater than those who continued treatment. Previous gynecological operations and increased TVL were effective predictors for discontinuation of treatment. The total score and subheadings of the PFDI-20; PFIQ total score and subheadings, with the exception of the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7); and FSFI scores improved after pessary treatment. Among patients who discontinued treatment, pain was the most common reason (41.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pessary treatment was associated with improvements in pelvic floor-related quality of life and sexual function; however, pain emerged as the primary reason for treatment discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Long-Term Effects of Pessary Treatment on Quality of Life, Symptoms, Sexual Function, and the Urinary System in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.\",\"authors\":\"Ozgen Nahya Ozdogar, Ibrahim Egemen Ertas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-025-06291-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Although pessary treatment is widely used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP), there is currently no clear information on its impact on long-term quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pessary treatment on quality of life (QoL), symptoms, sexual function, and the urinary system in women with POP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who presented to our clinic due to POP and were treated with a pessary were evaluated. To examine the effects of pessary treatment on QoL, the urinary system, and sexual function, validated questionnaires, including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), were completed by those who continued to receive pessary treatment. The patients' gynecological examinations were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were enrolled in the study. Four patients died owing to systemic comorbidities. Among the remaining patients, 12 discontinued pessary use (mean duration 27.36 months), while 54 continued the treatment (mean duration 25.43 months). The pessary size, total vaginal length (TVL), and genital hiatus (GH) of women with POP who discontinued treatment were greater than those who continued treatment. Previous gynecological operations and increased TVL were effective predictors for discontinuation of treatment. The total score and subheadings of the PFDI-20; PFIQ total score and subheadings, with the exception of the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7); and FSFI scores improved after pessary treatment. Among patients who discontinued treatment, pain was the most common reason (41.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pessary treatment was associated with improvements in pelvic floor-related quality of life and sexual function; however, pain emerged as the primary reason for treatment discontinuation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06291-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06291-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和假设:虽然盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的治疗广泛采用必要的治疗方法,但目前尚无明确的信息表明其对长期生活质量的影响。本研究的目的是探讨必要的治疗对女性POP患者的生活质量(QoL)、症状、性功能和泌尿系统的影响。方法:对因POP就诊并行子宫托治疗的患者进行评估。为了检查子宫托治疗对生活质量、泌尿系统和性功能的影响,对继续接受子宫托治疗的患者进行了有效的问卷调查,包括盆底困扰问卷-20 (PFDI-20)、盆底影响问卷(PFIQ)和女性性功能指数(FSFI)。对患者进行妇科检查。结果:70例患者入组研究。4例患者死于全身合并症。在其余患者中,12例停止必要使用(平均持续时间27.36个月),54例继续治疗(平均持续时间25.43个月)。停止治疗的POP女性的子宫大小、阴道总长度(TVL)和生殖器间隙(GH)大于继续治疗的女性。既往妇科手术和TVL升高是终止治疗的有效预测因素。PFDI-20总分及小标题;PFIQ总分和副标题,结直肠肛管影响问卷(CRAIQ-7)除外;经必要治疗后,FSFI评分有所改善。在停止治疗的患者中,疼痛是最常见的原因(41.6%)。结论:盆底治疗与盆底相关生活质量和性功能改善相关;然而,疼痛成为停止治疗的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Long-Term Effects of Pessary Treatment on Quality of Life, Symptoms, Sexual Function, and the Urinary System in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Introduction and hypothesis: Although pessary treatment is widely used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP), there is currently no clear information on its impact on long-term quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pessary treatment on quality of life (QoL), symptoms, sexual function, and the urinary system in women with POP.

Methods: Patients who presented to our clinic due to POP and were treated with a pessary were evaluated. To examine the effects of pessary treatment on QoL, the urinary system, and sexual function, validated questionnaires, including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), were completed by those who continued to receive pessary treatment. The patients' gynecological examinations were performed.

Results: Seventy patients were enrolled in the study. Four patients died owing to systemic comorbidities. Among the remaining patients, 12 discontinued pessary use (mean duration 27.36 months), while 54 continued the treatment (mean duration 25.43 months). The pessary size, total vaginal length (TVL), and genital hiatus (GH) of women with POP who discontinued treatment were greater than those who continued treatment. Previous gynecological operations and increased TVL were effective predictors for discontinuation of treatment. The total score and subheadings of the PFDI-20; PFIQ total score and subheadings, with the exception of the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7); and FSFI scores improved after pessary treatment. Among patients who discontinued treatment, pain was the most common reason (41.6%).

Conclusions: Pessary treatment was associated with improvements in pelvic floor-related quality of life and sexual function; however, pain emerged as the primary reason for treatment discontinuation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信