探索多种癌症早期检测方法的障碍和促进因素。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Nicole L Henderson, Tanvi V Padalkar, Ana Falcão, Indya Starks, Hennessy Williams, Courtney P Williams, Rebecca Arend, Gabrielle B Rocque
{"title":"探索多种癌症早期检测方法的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Nicole L Henderson, Tanvi V Padalkar, Ana Falcão, Indya Starks, Hennessy Williams, Courtney P Williams, Rebecca Arend, Gabrielle B Rocque","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are a novel approach to cancer screening, offering potential to detect multiple cancers through a single blood draw. This study explored the barriers and facilitators to buy-in of MCED tests and to develop a communication tool to support informed decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using grounded theory. Twenty participants, including primary care patients and caregivers of patients with cancer from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, were interviewed between January and August 2024. Semi-structured interviews examined participants' knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors related to cancer screening and MCED testing. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory and a constant comparative method to identify themes, and findings informed the development of a communication tool highlighting critical aspects of MCED testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants expressed interest in early cancer detection, citing benefits such as improved health outcomes and peace of mind. However, enthusiasm was tempered by concerns about overdiagnosis, emotional distress from ambiguous results, test accuracy, financial burden, and uncertainties surrounding MCED testing. On the basis of these findings, a preliminary communication tool was developed to address critical aspects of MCED testing, including test accuracy and reliability, scope of testing, emotional implications, costs and insurance, follow-up care, and privacy concerns. This prototype was designed to facilitate patient-provider discussions by prioritizing the domains identified as essential for informed decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although MCED tests are viewed as promising, their adoption requires addressing key barriers, including emotional, financial, and logistical challenges. The identified communication domains, and the preliminary communication tool informed by these findings, provide an initial framework for supporting patient-centered discussions and integration of MCED screening into clinical practice. Future research should focus on testing and refining the tool to evaluate its effectiveness in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500203"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to the Buy-In of Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole L Henderson, Tanvi V Padalkar, Ana Falcão, Indya Starks, Hennessy Williams, Courtney P Williams, Rebecca Arend, Gabrielle B Rocque\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP-25-00203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are a novel approach to cancer screening, offering potential to detect multiple cancers through a single blood draw. This study explored the barriers and facilitators to buy-in of MCED tests and to develop a communication tool to support informed decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using grounded theory. Twenty participants, including primary care patients and caregivers of patients with cancer from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, were interviewed between January and August 2024. Semi-structured interviews examined participants' knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors related to cancer screening and MCED testing. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory and a constant comparative method to identify themes, and findings informed the development of a communication tool highlighting critical aspects of MCED testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants expressed interest in early cancer detection, citing benefits such as improved health outcomes and peace of mind. However, enthusiasm was tempered by concerns about overdiagnosis, emotional distress from ambiguous results, test accuracy, financial burden, and uncertainties surrounding MCED testing. On the basis of these findings, a preliminary communication tool was developed to address critical aspects of MCED testing, including test accuracy and reliability, scope of testing, emotional implications, costs and insurance, follow-up care, and privacy concerns. This prototype was designed to facilitate patient-provider discussions by prioritizing the domains identified as essential for informed decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although MCED tests are viewed as promising, their adoption requires addressing key barriers, including emotional, financial, and logistical challenges. The identified communication domains, and the preliminary communication tool informed by these findings, provide an initial framework for supporting patient-centered discussions and integration of MCED screening into clinical practice. Future research should focus on testing and refining the tool to evaluate its effectiveness in diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"OP2500203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00203\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多种癌症早期检测(MCED)测试是一种新的癌症筛查方法,提供了通过一次抽血检测多种癌症的潜力。本研究探讨了接受MCED测试的障碍和促进因素,并开发了一种沟通工具,以支持知情决策。方法:采用扎根理论进行横断面定性研究。在2024年1月至8月期间,来自伯明翰阿拉巴马大学的20名参与者接受了采访,其中包括初级保健患者和癌症患者的护理人员。半结构化访谈检查了参与者与癌症筛查和MCED测试相关的知识、信念和行为。访谈采用扎根理论和持续比较方法进行分析,以确定主题,调查结果为开发突出MCED测试关键方面的交流工具提供了信息。结果:参与者表达了对早期癌症检测的兴趣,提到了诸如改善健康结果和心灵平静等好处。然而,由于担心过度诊断、模棱两可的结果带来的情绪困扰、测试准确性、经济负担以及围绕MCED测试的不确定性,热情有所减弱。在这些发现的基础上,开发了一个初步的沟通工具来解决MCED测试的关键方面,包括测试的准确性和可靠性、测试范围、情感影响、成本和保险、后续护理和隐私问题。这个原型的设计是为了促进患者与提供者的讨论,通过优先考虑被确定为明智决策所必需的领域。结论:尽管MCED测试被视为很有前途,但采用它们需要解决主要障碍,包括情感、财务和后勤方面的挑战。确定的沟通领域,以及根据这些发现提供的初步沟通工具,为支持以患者为中心的讨论和将MCED筛查整合到临床实践中提供了一个初步框架。未来的研究应侧重于测试和完善该工具,以评估其在不同人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to the Buy-In of Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests.

Purpose: Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are a novel approach to cancer screening, offering potential to detect multiple cancers through a single blood draw. This study explored the barriers and facilitators to buy-in of MCED tests and to develop a communication tool to support informed decision making.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using grounded theory. Twenty participants, including primary care patients and caregivers of patients with cancer from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, were interviewed between January and August 2024. Semi-structured interviews examined participants' knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors related to cancer screening and MCED testing. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory and a constant comparative method to identify themes, and findings informed the development of a communication tool highlighting critical aspects of MCED testing.

Results: Participants expressed interest in early cancer detection, citing benefits such as improved health outcomes and peace of mind. However, enthusiasm was tempered by concerns about overdiagnosis, emotional distress from ambiguous results, test accuracy, financial burden, and uncertainties surrounding MCED testing. On the basis of these findings, a preliminary communication tool was developed to address critical aspects of MCED testing, including test accuracy and reliability, scope of testing, emotional implications, costs and insurance, follow-up care, and privacy concerns. This prototype was designed to facilitate patient-provider discussions by prioritizing the domains identified as essential for informed decision making.

Conclusion: Although MCED tests are viewed as promising, their adoption requires addressing key barriers, including emotional, financial, and logistical challenges. The identified communication domains, and the preliminary communication tool informed by these findings, provide an initial framework for supporting patient-centered discussions and integration of MCED screening into clinical practice. Future research should focus on testing and refining the tool to evaluate its effectiveness in diverse populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信