超越药片的思考:在英国,gbsm和不同性别的男男性行为者对不同HIV-PrEP方式的可接受性。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Dana Ogaz, Natasha Ratna, Hridhya Vijayan, Stephanie J Migchelsen, David Reid, Dolores Mullen, Dawn Phillips, Eleanor Bell, Tamara Djuretic, Will Nutland, Catherine H Mercer, Kate Folkard, John Saunders, Hamish Mohammed
{"title":"超越药片的思考:在英国,gbsm和不同性别的男男性行为者对不同HIV-PrEP方式的可接受性。","authors":"Dana Ogaz, Natasha Ratna, Hridhya Vijayan, Stephanie J Migchelsen, David Reid, Dolores Mullen, Dawn Phillips, Eleanor Bell, Tamara Djuretic, Will Nutland, Catherine H Mercer, Kate Folkard, John Saunders, Hamish Mohammed","doi":"10.1177/09564624251369093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHIV-PrEP is a key component of HIV combination prevention and has been routinely available through oral formulations (i.e. oral tablets) across sexual health services (SHSs) in the UK since 2020. We used data from a large, online community survey to assess the acceptability and preference of different HIV-PrEP modalities among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and gender-diverse individuals living in the UK.MethodsUsing data collected from the 'Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health' (RiiSH) survey, an online community survey of 1106 GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men (November/December 2023), we performed a secondary analysis examining HIV-PrEP modality acceptability and preference (e.g. oral, long acting injectable, gel, or patch) (%) by HIV-PrEP history (never, in lookback period of last 3-4 months since survey completion). Where ≥2 modalities were indicated, participants were asked to specify a single preferred modality. Single choice options were assumed to be the preferred HIV-PrEP modality.ResultsIrrespective of HIV-PrEP history, long acting injectables were highly acceptable (>70%) and the preferred modality (58% [222/386] by those never having used HIV-PrEP, 73% [75/103] in those without HIV-PrEP use in the lookback, 74% [314/424] in those with HIV-PrEP use in the lookback).ConclusionsWe found high acceptability of the use of injectables, with general preference over oral tablets. If injectable HIV-PrEP becomes available at SHSs in England, these modalities could have positive impacts on HIV-PrEP delivery, use, and access.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"9564624251369093"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thinking beyond the tablet: Acceptability of different HIV-PrEP modalities among GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Ogaz, Natasha Ratna, Hridhya Vijayan, Stephanie J Migchelsen, David Reid, Dolores Mullen, Dawn Phillips, Eleanor Bell, Tamara Djuretic, Will Nutland, Catherine H Mercer, Kate Folkard, John Saunders, Hamish Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09564624251369093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundHIV-PrEP is a key component of HIV combination prevention and has been routinely available through oral formulations (i.e. oral tablets) across sexual health services (SHSs) in the UK since 2020. We used data from a large, online community survey to assess the acceptability and preference of different HIV-PrEP modalities among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and gender-diverse individuals living in the UK.MethodsUsing data collected from the 'Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health' (RiiSH) survey, an online community survey of 1106 GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men (November/December 2023), we performed a secondary analysis examining HIV-PrEP modality acceptability and preference (e.g. oral, long acting injectable, gel, or patch) (%) by HIV-PrEP history (never, in lookback period of last 3-4 months since survey completion). Where ≥2 modalities were indicated, participants were asked to specify a single preferred modality. Single choice options were assumed to be the preferred HIV-PrEP modality.ResultsIrrespective of HIV-PrEP history, long acting injectables were highly acceptable (>70%) and the preferred modality (58% [222/386] by those never having used HIV-PrEP, 73% [75/103] in those without HIV-PrEP use in the lookback, 74% [314/424] in those with HIV-PrEP use in the lookback).ConclusionsWe found high acceptability of the use of injectables, with general preference over oral tablets. If injectable HIV-PrEP becomes available at SHSs in England, these modalities could have positive impacts on HIV-PrEP delivery, use, and access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9564624251369093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251369093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251369093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

HIV- prep是HIV联合预防的关键组成部分,自2020年以来,通过口服制剂(即口服片剂)在英国的性健康服务机构(SHSs)中常规提供。我们使用了一项大型在线社区调查的数据,以评估生活在英国的同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)以及性别多样化个体对不同HIV-PrEP方式的可接受性和偏好。方法利用“减少性健康不平等”(RiiSH)调查收集的数据,该调查是一项对1106名GBMSM和性别多样化的男男性行为者进行的在线社区调查(2023年11月/ 12月),我们对HIV-PrEP的可接受性和偏好(如口服、长效注射、凝胶或贴片)(%)进行了二次分析,检查HIV-PrEP的历史(从未,调查完成后的最近3-4个月的回访期)。当指定≥2种模式时,要求参与者指定一种首选模式。假设单一选择方案是首选的HIV-PrEP方式。结果与HIV-PrEP史无关,长效注射剂的可接受度为58%(222/386),既往未使用HIV-PrEP者为73%(75/103),既往使用HIV-PrEP者为74%(314/424)。结论我们发现注射剂的使用可接受性高,普遍优于口服片剂。如果可注射的HIV-PrEP在英格兰的SHSs中可用,这些模式可能对HIV-PrEP的递送、使用和获取产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thinking beyond the tablet: Acceptability of different HIV-PrEP modalities among GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in the UK.

BackgroundHIV-PrEP is a key component of HIV combination prevention and has been routinely available through oral formulations (i.e. oral tablets) across sexual health services (SHSs) in the UK since 2020. We used data from a large, online community survey to assess the acceptability and preference of different HIV-PrEP modalities among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and gender-diverse individuals living in the UK.MethodsUsing data collected from the 'Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health' (RiiSH) survey, an online community survey of 1106 GBMSM and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men (November/December 2023), we performed a secondary analysis examining HIV-PrEP modality acceptability and preference (e.g. oral, long acting injectable, gel, or patch) (%) by HIV-PrEP history (never, in lookback period of last 3-4 months since survey completion). Where ≥2 modalities were indicated, participants were asked to specify a single preferred modality. Single choice options were assumed to be the preferred HIV-PrEP modality.ResultsIrrespective of HIV-PrEP history, long acting injectables were highly acceptable (>70%) and the preferred modality (58% [222/386] by those never having used HIV-PrEP, 73% [75/103] in those without HIV-PrEP use in the lookback, 74% [314/424] in those with HIV-PrEP use in the lookback).ConclusionsWe found high acceptability of the use of injectables, with general preference over oral tablets. If injectable HIV-PrEP becomes available at SHSs in England, these modalities could have positive impacts on HIV-PrEP delivery, use, and access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信