利用多相方法将aquimaris Algoriphagus Kim et al. 2020重新分类为Algoriphagus formosus Ye et al. 2020的后异型同义词。

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Jiaxing Liu, Mengyin Fu, Ping Mo, Bailu Tang, Fengying Liu
{"title":"利用多相方法将aquimaris Algoriphagus Kim et al. 2020重新分类为Algoriphagus formosus Ye et al. 2020的后异型同义词。","authors":"Jiaxing Liu, Mengyin Fu, Ping Mo, Bailu Tang, Fengying Liu","doi":"10.1099/ijsem.0.006887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that <i>Algoriphagus aquimaris</i> F21<sup>T</sup> shared the highest sequence similarity of 100.00% to <i>Algoriphagus formosus</i> XAY3209<sup>T</sup>. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences revealed that <i>A. aquimaris</i> F21<sup>T</sup> formed a cluster with <i>A. formosus</i> XAY3209<sup>T</sup>, suggesting that there was a close genetic relationship between them. However, the average nucleotide identity (ANIb/m) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization values between <i>A. aquimaris</i> F21<sup>T</sup> and <i>A. formosus</i> XAY3209<sup>T</sup> were 97.48%/97.73% and 79.50%, respectively, greater than the 95-96.00% and 70.00% cut-off points recommended for delineating bacterial species, which suggested that these two strains belonged to the same species. In addition, the comprehensive comparison of phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics further verified this conclusion. Based on all these data above and rule 42 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, we propose that <i>A. aquimaris</i> Kim <i>et al</i>. 2020 is a later heterotypic synonym of <i>A. formosus</i> Ye <i>et al</i>. 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":14390,"journal":{"name":"International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology","volume":"75 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclassification of <i>Algoriphagus aquimaris</i> Kim <i>et al</i>. 2020 as a later heterotypic synonym of <i>Algoriphagus formosus</i> Ye <i>et al</i>. 2020 using a polyphasic approach.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxing Liu, Mengyin Fu, Ping Mo, Bailu Tang, Fengying Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/ijsem.0.006887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that <i>Algoriphagus aquimaris</i> F21<sup>T</sup> shared the highest sequence similarity of 100.00% to <i>Algoriphagus formosus</i> XAY3209<sup>T</sup>. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences revealed that <i>A. aquimaris</i> F21<sup>T</sup> formed a cluster with <i>A. formosus</i> XAY3209<sup>T</sup>, suggesting that there was a close genetic relationship between them. However, the average nucleotide identity (ANIb/m) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization values between <i>A. aquimaris</i> F21<sup>T</sup> and <i>A. formosus</i> XAY3209<sup>T</sup> were 97.48%/97.73% and 79.50%, respectively, greater than the 95-96.00% and 70.00% cut-off points recommended for delineating bacterial species, which suggested that these two strains belonged to the same species. In addition, the comprehensive comparison of phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics further verified this conclusion. Based on all these data above and rule 42 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, we propose that <i>A. aquimaris</i> Kim <i>et al</i>. 2020 is a later heterotypic synonym of <i>A. formosus</i> Ye <i>et al</i>. 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology\",\"volume\":\"75 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

16S rRNA基因序列分析表明,aquimaris Algoriphagus F21T与formosus Algoriphagus XAY3209T序列相似性最高,为100.00%。基于16S rRNA基因和全基因组序列的系统发育分析显示,水貂F21T与台湾水貂XAY3209T形成了一个集群,表明它们之间存在密切的亲缘关系。结果表明,双歧杆菌F21T和台湾双歧杆菌XAY3209T的平均核苷酸同源性(ANIb/m)和数字DNA-DNA杂交值分别为97.48%/97.73%和79.50%,均高于95-96.00%和70.00%的细菌种类划分临界值,表明两株菌株属于同一种。此外,表型和化学分类特征的综合比较进一步验证了这一结论。基于以上所有数据和《国际原核生物命名规则》第42条,我们认为a.a aquimaris Kim et al. 2020是a.f ormosus Ye et al. 2020的后异型同义种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reclassification of Algoriphagus aquimaris Kim et al. 2020 as a later heterotypic synonym of Algoriphagus formosus Ye et al. 2020 using a polyphasic approach.

16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that Algoriphagus aquimaris F21T shared the highest sequence similarity of 100.00% to Algoriphagus formosus XAY3209T. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences revealed that A. aquimaris F21T formed a cluster with A. formosus XAY3209T, suggesting that there was a close genetic relationship between them. However, the average nucleotide identity (ANIb/m) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization values between A. aquimaris F21T and A. formosus XAY3209T were 97.48%/97.73% and 79.50%, respectively, greater than the 95-96.00% and 70.00% cut-off points recommended for delineating bacterial species, which suggested that these two strains belonged to the same species. In addition, the comprehensive comparison of phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics further verified this conclusion. Based on all these data above and rule 42 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, we propose that A. aquimaris Kim et al. 2020 is a later heterotypic synonym of A. formosus Ye et al. 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.40%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published by the Microbiology Society and owned by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP), a committee of the Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology Division of the International Union of Microbiological Societies, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology is the leading forum for the publication of novel microbial taxa and the ICSP’s official journal of record for prokaryotic names. The journal welcomes high-quality research on all aspects of microbial evolution, phylogenetics and systematics, encouraging submissions on all prokaryotes, yeasts, microfungi, protozoa and microalgae across the full breadth of systematics including: Identification, characterisation and culture preservation Microbial evolution and biodiversity Molecular environmental work with strong taxonomic or evolutionary content Nomenclature Taxonomy and phylogenetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信