{"title":"玻璃体内抗vegf治疗近视脉络膜新生血管的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Jing-Yao Liu, Ju-Ping Liu, Xiao-Rong Li","doi":"10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report the 24mo outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in routine clinical practice and simultaneously evaluated the real-world safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who received intravitreal injections of VEGF inhibitors of either ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or conbercept (0.5 mg) for mCNV were analyzed from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2022. The primary outcome variables were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes. The secondary outcome variables included IOP changes, the period of mCNV re-treatment, and ocular adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 83 patients aged 56.40±15.36y with axial length 29.67±2.09 mm were included. In visual acuity, the mean logMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.81±0.43. After the initial improvement at 1, 3, and 6mo (<i>P</i><0.05), from month 12 onwards, no statistical difference compared to baseline was found. The mean CMT from 1mo onwards had a statistically significant decrease compared with baseline CMT (<i>P</i><0.05). The regression model showed better baseline BCVA and thicker baseline CMT, significantly associated with the final outcomes. In univariate analysis, choosing 3+<i>pro re nata</i> (PRN) as the initial injection treatment regimen was associated with better BCVA at 24mo [hazard ratio (HR)=-0.65, 95%CI: -1.23, -0.07, <i>P</i>=0.048]. However, the difference was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR=-0.59, 95%CI: -1.21, 0.03, <i>P</i>=0.089). Regarding mCNV recurrence, the mean period (<i>P</i>=0.725) and the proportion of mCNV reactivation (<i>P</i>=1.00) were similar between ranibizumab and conbercept. Kaplan-Meier plot also analyzed that the median time of re-injection was not significantly different among gender, drug, and initial injection treatment regimen. No systemic adverse events related to the therapy were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BCVA gains achieved by the end of our study maintain generally sustained at the 24-mo follow-up. The findings also indicate that ranibizumab and conbercept demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Additionally, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy using 1+PRN regimen, offers certain advantages in both efficacy and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14312,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology","volume":"18 9","pages":"1681-1688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF for myopic choroidal neovascularization.\",\"authors\":\"Jing-Yao Liu, Ju-Ping Liu, Xiao-Rong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report the 24mo outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in routine clinical practice and simultaneously evaluated the real-world safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who received intravitreal injections of VEGF inhibitors of either ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or conbercept (0.5 mg) for mCNV were analyzed from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2022. The primary outcome variables were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes. The secondary outcome variables included IOP changes, the period of mCNV re-treatment, and ocular adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 83 patients aged 56.40±15.36y with axial length 29.67±2.09 mm were included. In visual acuity, the mean logMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.81±0.43. After the initial improvement at 1, 3, and 6mo (<i>P</i><0.05), from month 12 onwards, no statistical difference compared to baseline was found. The mean CMT from 1mo onwards had a statistically significant decrease compared with baseline CMT (<i>P</i><0.05). The regression model showed better baseline BCVA and thicker baseline CMT, significantly associated with the final outcomes. In univariate analysis, choosing 3+<i>pro re nata</i> (PRN) as the initial injection treatment regimen was associated with better BCVA at 24mo [hazard ratio (HR)=-0.65, 95%CI: -1.23, -0.07, <i>P</i>=0.048]. However, the difference was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR=-0.59, 95%CI: -1.21, 0.03, <i>P</i>=0.089). Regarding mCNV recurrence, the mean period (<i>P</i>=0.725) and the proportion of mCNV reactivation (<i>P</i>=1.00) were similar between ranibizumab and conbercept. Kaplan-Meier plot also analyzed that the median time of re-injection was not significantly different among gender, drug, and initial injection treatment regimen. No systemic adverse events related to the therapy were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BCVA gains achieved by the end of our study maintain generally sustained at the 24-mo follow-up. The findings also indicate that ranibizumab and conbercept demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Additionally, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy using 1+PRN regimen, offers certain advantages in both efficacy and cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"1681-1688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF for myopic choroidal neovascularization.
Aim: To report the 24mo outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in routine clinical practice and simultaneously evaluated the real-world safety.
Methods: The patients who received intravitreal injections of VEGF inhibitors of either ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or conbercept (0.5 mg) for mCNV were analyzed from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2022. The primary outcome variables were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes. The secondary outcome variables included IOP changes, the period of mCNV re-treatment, and ocular adverse events.
Results: Totally 83 patients aged 56.40±15.36y with axial length 29.67±2.09 mm were included. In visual acuity, the mean logMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.81±0.43. After the initial improvement at 1, 3, and 6mo (P<0.05), from month 12 onwards, no statistical difference compared to baseline was found. The mean CMT from 1mo onwards had a statistically significant decrease compared with baseline CMT (P<0.05). The regression model showed better baseline BCVA and thicker baseline CMT, significantly associated with the final outcomes. In univariate analysis, choosing 3+pro re nata (PRN) as the initial injection treatment regimen was associated with better BCVA at 24mo [hazard ratio (HR)=-0.65, 95%CI: -1.23, -0.07, P=0.048]. However, the difference was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR=-0.59, 95%CI: -1.21, 0.03, P=0.089). Regarding mCNV recurrence, the mean period (P=0.725) and the proportion of mCNV reactivation (P=1.00) were similar between ranibizumab and conbercept. Kaplan-Meier plot also analyzed that the median time of re-injection was not significantly different among gender, drug, and initial injection treatment regimen. No systemic adverse events related to the therapy were observed.
Conclusion: BCVA gains achieved by the end of our study maintain generally sustained at the 24-mo follow-up. The findings also indicate that ranibizumab and conbercept demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Additionally, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy using 1+PRN regimen, offers certain advantages in both efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
· International Journal of Ophthalmology-IJO (English edition) is a global ophthalmological scientific publication
and a peer-reviewed open access periodical (ISSN 2222-3959 print, ISSN 2227-4898 online).
This journal is sponsored by Chinese Medical Association Xi’an Branch and obtains guidance and support from
WHO and ICO (International Council of Ophthalmology). It has been indexed in SCIE, PubMed,
PubMed-Central, Chemical Abstracts, Scopus, EMBASE , and DOAJ. IJO JCR IF in 2017 is 1.166.
IJO was established in 2008, with editorial office in Xi’an, China. It is a monthly publication. General Scientific
Advisors include Prof. Hugh Taylor (President of ICO); Prof.Bruce Spivey (Immediate Past President of ICO);
Prof.Mark Tso (Ex-Vice President of ICO) and Prof.Daiming Fan (Academician and Vice President,
Chinese Academy of Engineering.
International Scientific Advisors include Prof. Serge Resnikoff (WHO Senior Speciatist for Prevention of
blindness), Prof. Chi-Chao Chan (National Eye Institute, USA) and Prof. Richard L Abbott (Ex-President of
AAO/PAAO) et al.
Honorary Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Li-Xin Xie(Academician of Chinese Academy of
Engineering/Honorary President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society); Prof. Dennis Lam (President of APAO) and
Prof. Xiao-Xin Li (Ex-President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society).
Chief Editor: Prof. Xiu-Wen Hu (President of IJO Press).
Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Yan-Nian Hui (Ex-Director, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA) and
Prof. George Chiou (Founding chief editor of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics).
Associate Editors-in-Chief include:
Prof. Ning-Li Wang (President Elect of APAO);
Prof. Ke Yao (President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society) ;
Prof.William Smiddy (Bascom Palmer Eye instituteUSA) ;
Prof.Joel Schuman (President of Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology,USA);
Prof.Yizhi Liu (Vice President of Chinese Ophtlalmology Society);
Prof.Yu-Sheng Wang (Director of Eye Institute of Chinese PLA);
Prof.Ling-Yun Cheng (Director of Ocular Pharmacology, Shiley Eye Center, USA).
IJO accepts contributions in English from all over the world. It includes mainly original articles and review articles,
both basic and clinical papers.
Instruction is Welcome Contribution is Welcome Citation is Welcome
Cooperation organization
International Council of Ophthalmology(ICO), PubMed, PMC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific, Thomson Reuters, The Charlesworth Group, Crossref,Scopus,Publons, DOAJ etc.