玻璃体内抗vegf治疗近视脉络膜新生血管的疗效和安全性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
International journal of ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09
Jing-Yao Liu, Ju-Ping Liu, Xiao-Rong Li
{"title":"玻璃体内抗vegf治疗近视脉络膜新生血管的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Jing-Yao Liu, Ju-Ping Liu, Xiao-Rong Li","doi":"10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report the 24mo outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in routine clinical practice and simultaneously evaluated the real-world safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who received intravitreal injections of VEGF inhibitors of either ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or conbercept (0.5 mg) for mCNV were analyzed from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2022. The primary outcome variables were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes. The secondary outcome variables included IOP changes, the period of mCNV re-treatment, and ocular adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 83 patients aged 56.40±15.36y with axial length 29.67±2.09 mm were included. In visual acuity, the mean logMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.81±0.43. After the initial improvement at 1, 3, and 6mo (<i>P</i><0.05), from month 12 onwards, no statistical difference compared to baseline was found. The mean CMT from 1mo onwards had a statistically significant decrease compared with baseline CMT (<i>P</i><0.05). The regression model showed better baseline BCVA and thicker baseline CMT, significantly associated with the final outcomes. In univariate analysis, choosing 3+<i>pro re nata</i> (PRN) as the initial injection treatment regimen was associated with better BCVA at 24mo [hazard ratio (HR)=-0.65, 95%CI: -1.23, -0.07, <i>P</i>=0.048]. However, the difference was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR=-0.59, 95%CI: -1.21, 0.03, <i>P</i>=0.089). Regarding mCNV recurrence, the mean period (<i>P</i>=0.725) and the proportion of mCNV reactivation (<i>P</i>=1.00) were similar between ranibizumab and conbercept. Kaplan-Meier plot also analyzed that the median time of re-injection was not significantly different among gender, drug, and initial injection treatment regimen. No systemic adverse events related to the therapy were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BCVA gains achieved by the end of our study maintain generally sustained at the 24-mo follow-up. The findings also indicate that ranibizumab and conbercept demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Additionally, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy using 1+PRN regimen, offers certain advantages in both efficacy and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14312,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology","volume":"18 9","pages":"1681-1688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF for myopic choroidal neovascularization.\",\"authors\":\"Jing-Yao Liu, Ju-Ping Liu, Xiao-Rong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report the 24mo outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in routine clinical practice and simultaneously evaluated the real-world safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who received intravitreal injections of VEGF inhibitors of either ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or conbercept (0.5 mg) for mCNV were analyzed from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2022. The primary outcome variables were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes. The secondary outcome variables included IOP changes, the period of mCNV re-treatment, and ocular adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 83 patients aged 56.40±15.36y with axial length 29.67±2.09 mm were included. In visual acuity, the mean logMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.81±0.43. After the initial improvement at 1, 3, and 6mo (<i>P</i><0.05), from month 12 onwards, no statistical difference compared to baseline was found. The mean CMT from 1mo onwards had a statistically significant decrease compared with baseline CMT (<i>P</i><0.05). The regression model showed better baseline BCVA and thicker baseline CMT, significantly associated with the final outcomes. In univariate analysis, choosing 3+<i>pro re nata</i> (PRN) as the initial injection treatment regimen was associated with better BCVA at 24mo [hazard ratio (HR)=-0.65, 95%CI: -1.23, -0.07, <i>P</i>=0.048]. However, the difference was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR=-0.59, 95%CI: -1.21, 0.03, <i>P</i>=0.089). Regarding mCNV recurrence, the mean period (<i>P</i>=0.725) and the proportion of mCNV reactivation (<i>P</i>=1.00) were similar between ranibizumab and conbercept. Kaplan-Meier plot also analyzed that the median time of re-injection was not significantly different among gender, drug, and initial injection treatment regimen. No systemic adverse events related to the therapy were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BCVA gains achieved by the end of our study maintain generally sustained at the 24-mo follow-up. The findings also indicate that ranibizumab and conbercept demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Additionally, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy using 1+PRN regimen, offers certain advantages in both efficacy and cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"1681-1688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.09.09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报道血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂治疗近视脉络膜新生血管(mCNV)的24mo临床疗效,同时评价其在现实世界中的安全性。方法:分析2017年1月1日至2022年1月1日期间接受玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗(0.5 mg)或conbercept (0.5 mg)治疗mCNV的VEGF抑制剂的患者。主要结果变量为最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的平均变化和中央黄斑厚度(CMT)的变化。次要结局变量包括IOP变化、mCNV再治疗时间和眼部不良事件。结果:共纳入83例患者,年龄56.40±15.36岁,轴长29.67±2.09 mm。在视力方面,基线时的平均logMAR BCVA为0.81±0.43。在1、3、6个月的初始改善后(PRN)作为初始注射治疗方案与24个月时更好的BCVA相关[风险比(HR)=-0.65, 95%CI: -1.23, -0.07, P=0.048]。但多因素分析差异无统计学意义(HR=-0.59, 95%CI: -1.21, 0.03, P=0.089)。在mCNV复发率方面,雷尼单抗与康伯利组的平均时间(P=0.725)和mCNV再激活比例(P=1.00)相似。Kaplan-Meier图还分析了再注射的中位时间在性别、药物和初始注射治疗方案之间无显著差异。未观察到与治疗相关的全身不良事件。结论:在24个月的随访中,本研究结束时BCVA的增加基本维持。研究结果还表明,雷尼单抗和conberept具有相当的疗效和安全性。此外,采用1+PRN方案的玻璃体内抗vegf治疗在疗效和成本效益方面都具有一定的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF for myopic choroidal neovascularization.

Aim: To report the 24mo outcomes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in routine clinical practice and simultaneously evaluated the real-world safety.

Methods: The patients who received intravitreal injections of VEGF inhibitors of either ranibizumab (0.5 mg) or conbercept (0.5 mg) for mCNV were analyzed from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2022. The primary outcome variables were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes. The secondary outcome variables included IOP changes, the period of mCNV re-treatment, and ocular adverse events.

Results: Totally 83 patients aged 56.40±15.36y with axial length 29.67±2.09 mm were included. In visual acuity, the mean logMAR BCVA at baseline was 0.81±0.43. After the initial improvement at 1, 3, and 6mo (P<0.05), from month 12 onwards, no statistical difference compared to baseline was found. The mean CMT from 1mo onwards had a statistically significant decrease compared with baseline CMT (P<0.05). The regression model showed better baseline BCVA and thicker baseline CMT, significantly associated with the final outcomes. In univariate analysis, choosing 3+pro re nata (PRN) as the initial injection treatment regimen was associated with better BCVA at 24mo [hazard ratio (HR)=-0.65, 95%CI: -1.23, -0.07, P=0.048]. However, the difference was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR=-0.59, 95%CI: -1.21, 0.03, P=0.089). Regarding mCNV recurrence, the mean period (P=0.725) and the proportion of mCNV reactivation (P=1.00) were similar between ranibizumab and conbercept. Kaplan-Meier plot also analyzed that the median time of re-injection was not significantly different among gender, drug, and initial injection treatment regimen. No systemic adverse events related to the therapy were observed.

Conclusion: BCVA gains achieved by the end of our study maintain generally sustained at the 24-mo follow-up. The findings also indicate that ranibizumab and conbercept demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Additionally, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy using 1+PRN regimen, offers certain advantages in both efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
3141
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: · International Journal of Ophthalmology-IJO (English edition) is a global ophthalmological scientific publication and a peer-reviewed open access periodical (ISSN 2222-3959 print, ISSN 2227-4898 online). This journal is sponsored by Chinese Medical Association Xi’an Branch and obtains guidance and support from WHO and ICO (International Council of Ophthalmology). It has been indexed in SCIE, PubMed, PubMed-Central, Chemical Abstracts, Scopus, EMBASE , and DOAJ. IJO JCR IF in 2017 is 1.166. IJO was established in 2008, with editorial office in Xi’an, China. It is a monthly publication. General Scientific Advisors include Prof. Hugh Taylor (President of ICO); Prof.Bruce Spivey (Immediate Past President of ICO); Prof.Mark Tso (Ex-Vice President of ICO) and Prof.Daiming Fan (Academician and Vice President, Chinese Academy of Engineering. International Scientific Advisors include Prof. Serge Resnikoff (WHO Senior Speciatist for Prevention of blindness), Prof. Chi-Chao Chan (National Eye Institute, USA) and Prof. Richard L Abbott (Ex-President of AAO/PAAO) et al. Honorary Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Li-Xin Xie(Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering/Honorary President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society); Prof. Dennis Lam (President of APAO) and Prof. Xiao-Xin Li (Ex-President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society). Chief Editor: Prof. Xiu-Wen Hu (President of IJO Press). Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Yan-Nian Hui (Ex-Director, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA) and Prof. George Chiou (Founding chief editor of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics). Associate Editors-in-Chief include: Prof. Ning-Li Wang (President Elect of APAO); Prof. Ke Yao (President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society) ; Prof.William Smiddy (Bascom Palmer Eye instituteUSA) ; Prof.Joel Schuman (President of Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology,USA); Prof.Yizhi Liu (Vice President of Chinese Ophtlalmology Society); Prof.Yu-Sheng Wang (Director of Eye Institute of Chinese PLA); Prof.Ling-Yun Cheng (Director of Ocular Pharmacology, Shiley Eye Center, USA). IJO accepts contributions in English from all over the world. It includes mainly original articles and review articles, both basic and clinical papers. Instruction is Welcome Contribution is Welcome Citation is Welcome Cooperation organization International Council of Ophthalmology(ICO), PubMed, PMC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific, Thomson Reuters, The Charlesworth Group, Crossref,Scopus,Publons, DOAJ etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信