荷兰住院康复单位对成人复杂精神病的指导药理学、心理学和社会干预的交付和延迟:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Thijs J Burger, Hans J de Haas, Robin M Van Eck, Martijn Kikkert, Frederike Schirmbeck, Astrid Vellinga, Lieuwe de Haan, Mariken B de Koning
{"title":"荷兰住院康复单位对成人复杂精神病的指导药理学、心理学和社会干预的交付和延迟:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Thijs J Burger, Hans J de Haas, Robin M Van Eck, Martijn Kikkert, Frederike Schirmbeck, Astrid Vellinga, Lieuwe de Haan, Mariken B de Koning","doi":"10.1177/00207640251358418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with complex psychosis admitted to inpatient mental health rehabilitation units (IMRU) constitute a low volume, high need, high cost group with a complicated recovery process.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To generate hypotheses regarding successful delivery of guideline care to patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs, based on clinical profiles and (historical) patterns of care delivery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective passive consent chart study of patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs in The Netherlands, mapping sociodemographic and clinical profiles, care trajectories and delivery of pharmacological (focusing on clozapine delay), psychological and social guideline interventions. We assessed relationships between non-delivery of psychological and social interventions, delay in clozapine treatment, and current symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 62 included patients had a mean illness duration of 21.6 years (<i>SD</i> 9.4); 89% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They exhibited severe symptoms (GAF-s: mean 33, <i>SD</i> 12.2), substantial functional impairment (GAF-f: mean 32, <i>SD</i> 9.5), a history of physical violence (74%) and/or severe substance use problems (61%), and limited or absent insight (87%). Care trajectories showed long-term instability of living environment, and frequent current compulsory care (76%). Of 54 patients with a clozapine treatment indication, 65% currently used it, of whom 94% started in IMRU setting, and 43% had one or more earlier aborted trials. Support in developing day activities was accepted by 87% of total sample, including patients without a day activity goal on beforehand. 66% developed day activities. We found associations between symptom severity, clozapine delay, declining psychological treatment, and not having day activity goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For some people with complex psychosis, clozapine treatment and psychosocial interventions may only materialize in specialized, long term, high structure settings offering continuity of care. Support in developing day activities may present a pathway to collaborative engagement. Early identification of those in need remains a challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251358418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivery and delay of guideline pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions for adults with complex psychosis in Dutch inpatient rehabilitation units: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Thijs J Burger, Hans J de Haas, Robin M Van Eck, Martijn Kikkert, Frederike Schirmbeck, Astrid Vellinga, Lieuwe de Haan, Mariken B de Koning\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251358418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with complex psychosis admitted to inpatient mental health rehabilitation units (IMRU) constitute a low volume, high need, high cost group with a complicated recovery process.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To generate hypotheses regarding successful delivery of guideline care to patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs, based on clinical profiles and (historical) patterns of care delivery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective passive consent chart study of patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs in The Netherlands, mapping sociodemographic and clinical profiles, care trajectories and delivery of pharmacological (focusing on clozapine delay), psychological and social guideline interventions. We assessed relationships between non-delivery of psychological and social interventions, delay in clozapine treatment, and current symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 62 included patients had a mean illness duration of 21.6 years (<i>SD</i> 9.4); 89% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They exhibited severe symptoms (GAF-s: mean 33, <i>SD</i> 12.2), substantial functional impairment (GAF-f: mean 32, <i>SD</i> 9.5), a history of physical violence (74%) and/or severe substance use problems (61%), and limited or absent insight (87%). Care trajectories showed long-term instability of living environment, and frequent current compulsory care (76%). Of 54 patients with a clozapine treatment indication, 65% currently used it, of whom 94% started in IMRU setting, and 43% had one or more earlier aborted trials. Support in developing day activities was accepted by 87% of total sample, including patients without a day activity goal on beforehand. 66% developed day activities. We found associations between symptom severity, clozapine delay, declining psychological treatment, and not having day activity goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For some people with complex psychosis, clozapine treatment and psychosocial interventions may only materialize in specialized, long term, high structure settings offering continuity of care. Support in developing day activities may present a pathway to collaborative engagement. Early identification of those in need remains a challenge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251358418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251358418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251358418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:住院心理健康康复单位(IMRU)的复杂精神病患者构成了一个低容量、高需求、高成本、康复过程复杂的群体。目的:基于临床资料和(历史)护理模式,对IMRUs中复杂精神病患者成功提供指导性护理提出假设。方法:对荷兰IMRUs患者的复杂精神病患者进行回顾性被动同意表研究,绘制社会人口统计学和临床概况,护理轨迹和药理学(重点是氯氮平延迟),心理和社会指导干预的交付。我们评估了未提供心理和社会干预、氯氮平治疗延迟和当前症状严重程度之间的关系。结果:62例纳入的患者平均病程为21.6年(SD 9.4);89%被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍。他们表现出严重的症状(GAF-s:平均33,SD 12.2),严重的功能障碍(GAF-f:平均32,SD 9.5),有身体暴力史(74%)和/或严重的物质使用问题(61%),以及有限或缺乏洞察力(87%)。护理轨迹表现为长期生活环境不稳定和频繁的当前强制护理(76%)。在54例氯氮平治疗指指的患者中,65%目前使用氯氮平,其中94%在IMRU环境中开始,43%有一个或多个早期流产的试验。87%的患者接受了对开展日常活动的支持,包括事先没有制定日常活动目标的患者。66%的人开展了日常活动。我们发现症状严重程度、氯氮平延迟、心理治疗减少和没有日常活动目标之间存在关联。结论:对于一些患有复杂精神病的人,氯氮平治疗和心理社会干预可能只能在专门的、长期的、高结构的环境中实现,提供连续性的护理。对日常活动的支持可能为协作参与提供了一条途径。早期识别需要帮助的人仍然是一项挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delivery and delay of guideline pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions for adults with complex psychosis in Dutch inpatient rehabilitation units: A retrospective study.

Background: People with complex psychosis admitted to inpatient mental health rehabilitation units (IMRU) constitute a low volume, high need, high cost group with a complicated recovery process.

Aims: To generate hypotheses regarding successful delivery of guideline care to patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs, based on clinical profiles and (historical) patterns of care delivery.

Method: A retrospective passive consent chart study of patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs in The Netherlands, mapping sociodemographic and clinical profiles, care trajectories and delivery of pharmacological (focusing on clozapine delay), psychological and social guideline interventions. We assessed relationships between non-delivery of psychological and social interventions, delay in clozapine treatment, and current symptom severity.

Results: The 62 included patients had a mean illness duration of 21.6 years (SD 9.4); 89% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They exhibited severe symptoms (GAF-s: mean 33, SD 12.2), substantial functional impairment (GAF-f: mean 32, SD 9.5), a history of physical violence (74%) and/or severe substance use problems (61%), and limited or absent insight (87%). Care trajectories showed long-term instability of living environment, and frequent current compulsory care (76%). Of 54 patients with a clozapine treatment indication, 65% currently used it, of whom 94% started in IMRU setting, and 43% had one or more earlier aborted trials. Support in developing day activities was accepted by 87% of total sample, including patients without a day activity goal on beforehand. 66% developed day activities. We found associations between symptom severity, clozapine delay, declining psychological treatment, and not having day activity goals.

Conclusions: For some people with complex psychosis, clozapine treatment and psychosocial interventions may only materialize in specialized, long term, high structure settings offering continuity of care. Support in developing day activities may present a pathway to collaborative engagement. Early identification of those in need remains a challenge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信