Thijs J Burger, Hans J de Haas, Robin M Van Eck, Martijn Kikkert, Frederike Schirmbeck, Astrid Vellinga, Lieuwe de Haan, Mariken B de Koning
{"title":"荷兰住院康复单位对成人复杂精神病的指导药理学、心理学和社会干预的交付和延迟:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Thijs J Burger, Hans J de Haas, Robin M Van Eck, Martijn Kikkert, Frederike Schirmbeck, Astrid Vellinga, Lieuwe de Haan, Mariken B de Koning","doi":"10.1177/00207640251358418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with complex psychosis admitted to inpatient mental health rehabilitation units (IMRU) constitute a low volume, high need, high cost group with a complicated recovery process.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To generate hypotheses regarding successful delivery of guideline care to patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs, based on clinical profiles and (historical) patterns of care delivery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective passive consent chart study of patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs in The Netherlands, mapping sociodemographic and clinical profiles, care trajectories and delivery of pharmacological (focusing on clozapine delay), psychological and social guideline interventions. We assessed relationships between non-delivery of psychological and social interventions, delay in clozapine treatment, and current symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 62 included patients had a mean illness duration of 21.6 years (<i>SD</i> 9.4); 89% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They exhibited severe symptoms (GAF-s: mean 33, <i>SD</i> 12.2), substantial functional impairment (GAF-f: mean 32, <i>SD</i> 9.5), a history of physical violence (74%) and/or severe substance use problems (61%), and limited or absent insight (87%). Care trajectories showed long-term instability of living environment, and frequent current compulsory care (76%). Of 54 patients with a clozapine treatment indication, 65% currently used it, of whom 94% started in IMRU setting, and 43% had one or more earlier aborted trials. Support in developing day activities was accepted by 87% of total sample, including patients without a day activity goal on beforehand. 66% developed day activities. We found associations between symptom severity, clozapine delay, declining psychological treatment, and not having day activity goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For some people with complex psychosis, clozapine treatment and psychosocial interventions may only materialize in specialized, long term, high structure settings offering continuity of care. Support in developing day activities may present a pathway to collaborative engagement. Early identification of those in need remains a challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251358418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivery and delay of guideline pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions for adults with complex psychosis in Dutch inpatient rehabilitation units: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Thijs J Burger, Hans J de Haas, Robin M Van Eck, Martijn Kikkert, Frederike Schirmbeck, Astrid Vellinga, Lieuwe de Haan, Mariken B de Koning\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251358418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with complex psychosis admitted to inpatient mental health rehabilitation units (IMRU) constitute a low volume, high need, high cost group with a complicated recovery process.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To generate hypotheses regarding successful delivery of guideline care to patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs, based on clinical profiles and (historical) patterns of care delivery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective passive consent chart study of patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs in The Netherlands, mapping sociodemographic and clinical profiles, care trajectories and delivery of pharmacological (focusing on clozapine delay), psychological and social guideline interventions. We assessed relationships between non-delivery of psychological and social interventions, delay in clozapine treatment, and current symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 62 included patients had a mean illness duration of 21.6 years (<i>SD</i> 9.4); 89% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They exhibited severe symptoms (GAF-s: mean 33, <i>SD</i> 12.2), substantial functional impairment (GAF-f: mean 32, <i>SD</i> 9.5), a history of physical violence (74%) and/or severe substance use problems (61%), and limited or absent insight (87%). Care trajectories showed long-term instability of living environment, and frequent current compulsory care (76%). Of 54 patients with a clozapine treatment indication, 65% currently used it, of whom 94% started in IMRU setting, and 43% had one or more earlier aborted trials. Support in developing day activities was accepted by 87% of total sample, including patients without a day activity goal on beforehand. 66% developed day activities. We found associations between symptom severity, clozapine delay, declining psychological treatment, and not having day activity goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For some people with complex psychosis, clozapine treatment and psychosocial interventions may only materialize in specialized, long term, high structure settings offering continuity of care. Support in developing day activities may present a pathway to collaborative engagement. Early identification of those in need remains a challenge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251358418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251358418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251358418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Delivery and delay of guideline pharmacological, psychological, and social interventions for adults with complex psychosis in Dutch inpatient rehabilitation units: A retrospective study.
Background: People with complex psychosis admitted to inpatient mental health rehabilitation units (IMRU) constitute a low volume, high need, high cost group with a complicated recovery process.
Aims: To generate hypotheses regarding successful delivery of guideline care to patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs, based on clinical profiles and (historical) patterns of care delivery.
Method: A retrospective passive consent chart study of patients with complex psychosis in IMRUs in The Netherlands, mapping sociodemographic and clinical profiles, care trajectories and delivery of pharmacological (focusing on clozapine delay), psychological and social guideline interventions. We assessed relationships between non-delivery of psychological and social interventions, delay in clozapine treatment, and current symptom severity.
Results: The 62 included patients had a mean illness duration of 21.6 years (SD 9.4); 89% were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. They exhibited severe symptoms (GAF-s: mean 33, SD 12.2), substantial functional impairment (GAF-f: mean 32, SD 9.5), a history of physical violence (74%) and/or severe substance use problems (61%), and limited or absent insight (87%). Care trajectories showed long-term instability of living environment, and frequent current compulsory care (76%). Of 54 patients with a clozapine treatment indication, 65% currently used it, of whom 94% started in IMRU setting, and 43% had one or more earlier aborted trials. Support in developing day activities was accepted by 87% of total sample, including patients without a day activity goal on beforehand. 66% developed day activities. We found associations between symptom severity, clozapine delay, declining psychological treatment, and not having day activity goals.
Conclusions: For some people with complex psychosis, clozapine treatment and psychosocial interventions may only materialize in specialized, long term, high structure settings offering continuity of care. Support in developing day activities may present a pathway to collaborative engagement. Early identification of those in need remains a challenge.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities.
Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas.
The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.