移民、种族化和民族文化多元化社区和社区治疗命令:范围审查。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hira Ahmad, Alasdair Forrest, Martin Rotenberg
{"title":"移民、种族化和民族文化多元化社区和社区治疗命令:范围审查。","authors":"Hira Ahmad, Alasdair Forrest, Martin Rotenberg","doi":"10.1177/00207640251353689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with serious mental illness from immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities experience greater coercion in mental health care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to scope the literature and synthesise findings relevant on the association between these groups, and the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) and related forms of compulsory community treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they directly examined the association between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders and related forms of treatment or presented relevant data as part of a larger study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 studies included 9 studies focussed directly on associations between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs, while 34 studies presented relevant data related to immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs albeit not the primary focus of the study. Most studies were quantitative, with varied study designs. The majority of studies were from Australia and New Zealand. followed by North America and the UK. Of the nine studies focussing directly on ethnicity and CTOs, results were mixed, and varied based on design, population and jurisdiction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationship between ethnicity, immigration status and CTOs is complex, with mixed findings across jurisdictions. Most of the literature comes from Australia and New Zealand, were Indigenous populations were a significant focus. The review highlights the need for more qualitative and quantitative research, especially in underrepresented ethnic groups and jurisdictions outside of Australia and New Zealand.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251353689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Hira Ahmad, Alasdair Forrest, Martin Rotenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251353689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with serious mental illness from immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities experience greater coercion in mental health care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to scope the literature and synthesise findings relevant on the association between these groups, and the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) and related forms of compulsory community treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they directly examined the association between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders and related forms of treatment or presented relevant data as part of a larger study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 studies included 9 studies focussed directly on associations between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs, while 34 studies presented relevant data related to immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs albeit not the primary focus of the study. Most studies were quantitative, with varied study designs. The majority of studies were from Australia and New Zealand. followed by North America and the UK. Of the nine studies focussing directly on ethnicity and CTOs, results were mixed, and varied based on design, population and jurisdiction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationship between ethnicity, immigration status and CTOs is complex, with mixed findings across jurisdictions. Most of the literature comes from Australia and New Zealand, were Indigenous populations were a significant focus. The review highlights the need for more qualitative and quantitative research, especially in underrepresented ethnic groups and jurisdictions outside of Australia and New Zealand.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251353689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251353689\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251353689","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来自移民、种族化和民族文化多样化社区的严重精神疾病患者在精神卫生保健中受到更大的胁迫。目的:本综述旨在对这些群体、社区治疗令(CTOs)的使用和相关形式的强制性社区治疗之间的关联进行文献梳理和综合研究。方法:检索5个电子数据库,检索相关文献。如果研究直接调查了移民、种族化和民族文化多样化社区与社区治疗顺序和相关治疗形式之间的关系,或将相关数据作为更大研究的一部分,则将其纳入研究。结果:在43项研究中,有9项研究直接关注移民、种族化和民族文化多元化社区与首席技术官之间的关系,而34项研究提供了与移民、种族化和民族文化多元化社区和首席技术官相关的相关数据,尽管这不是研究的主要焦点。大多数研究都是定量的,研究设计多种多样。大多数研究来自澳大利亚和新西兰。其次是北美和英国。在直接关注种族和首席技术官的9项研究中,结果是混合的,并且根据设计、人口和司法管辖区而有所不同。结论:种族、移民身份和首席技术官之间的关系是复杂的,在不同的司法管辖区有不同的结果。大多数文献来自澳大利亚和新西兰,土著人口是一个重要的焦点。审查强调需要进行更多的定性和定量研究,特别是在代表性不足的族裔群体和澳大利亚和新西兰以外的司法管辖区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders: A scoping review.

Background: People with serious mental illness from immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities experience greater coercion in mental health care.

Aims: This review aims to scope the literature and synthesise findings relevant on the association between these groups, and the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) and related forms of compulsory community treatment.

Method: Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they directly examined the association between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders and related forms of treatment or presented relevant data as part of a larger study.

Results: Of the 43 studies included 9 studies focussed directly on associations between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs, while 34 studies presented relevant data related to immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs albeit not the primary focus of the study. Most studies were quantitative, with varied study designs. The majority of studies were from Australia and New Zealand. followed by North America and the UK. Of the nine studies focussing directly on ethnicity and CTOs, results were mixed, and varied based on design, population and jurisdiction.

Conclusions: The relationship between ethnicity, immigration status and CTOs is complex, with mixed findings across jurisdictions. Most of the literature comes from Australia and New Zealand, were Indigenous populations were a significant focus. The review highlights the need for more qualitative and quantitative research, especially in underrepresented ethnic groups and jurisdictions outside of Australia and New Zealand.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信