{"title":"移民、种族化和民族文化多元化社区和社区治疗命令:范围审查。","authors":"Hira Ahmad, Alasdair Forrest, Martin Rotenberg","doi":"10.1177/00207640251353689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with serious mental illness from immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities experience greater coercion in mental health care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to scope the literature and synthesise findings relevant on the association between these groups, and the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) and related forms of compulsory community treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they directly examined the association between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders and related forms of treatment or presented relevant data as part of a larger study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 studies included 9 studies focussed directly on associations between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs, while 34 studies presented relevant data related to immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs albeit not the primary focus of the study. Most studies were quantitative, with varied study designs. The majority of studies were from Australia and New Zealand. followed by North America and the UK. Of the nine studies focussing directly on ethnicity and CTOs, results were mixed, and varied based on design, population and jurisdiction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationship between ethnicity, immigration status and CTOs is complex, with mixed findings across jurisdictions. Most of the literature comes from Australia and New Zealand, were Indigenous populations were a significant focus. The review highlights the need for more qualitative and quantitative research, especially in underrepresented ethnic groups and jurisdictions outside of Australia and New Zealand.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251353689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Hira Ahmad, Alasdair Forrest, Martin Rotenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251353689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with serious mental illness from immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities experience greater coercion in mental health care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to scope the literature and synthesise findings relevant on the association between these groups, and the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) and related forms of compulsory community treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they directly examined the association between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders and related forms of treatment or presented relevant data as part of a larger study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 43 studies included 9 studies focussed directly on associations between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs, while 34 studies presented relevant data related to immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs albeit not the primary focus of the study. Most studies were quantitative, with varied study designs. The majority of studies were from Australia and New Zealand. followed by North America and the UK. Of the nine studies focussing directly on ethnicity and CTOs, results were mixed, and varied based on design, population and jurisdiction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationship between ethnicity, immigration status and CTOs is complex, with mixed findings across jurisdictions. Most of the literature comes from Australia and New Zealand, were Indigenous populations were a significant focus. The review highlights the need for more qualitative and quantitative research, especially in underrepresented ethnic groups and jurisdictions outside of Australia and New Zealand.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251353689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251353689\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251353689","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders: A scoping review.
Background: People with serious mental illness from immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities experience greater coercion in mental health care.
Aims: This review aims to scope the literature and synthesise findings relevant on the association between these groups, and the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) and related forms of compulsory community treatment.
Method: Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they directly examined the association between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and community treatment orders and related forms of treatment or presented relevant data as part of a larger study.
Results: Of the 43 studies included 9 studies focussed directly on associations between immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs, while 34 studies presented relevant data related to immigrant, racialised and ethno-culturally diverse communities and CTOs albeit not the primary focus of the study. Most studies were quantitative, with varied study designs. The majority of studies were from Australia and New Zealand. followed by North America and the UK. Of the nine studies focussing directly on ethnicity and CTOs, results were mixed, and varied based on design, population and jurisdiction.
Conclusions: The relationship between ethnicity, immigration status and CTOs is complex, with mixed findings across jurisdictions. Most of the literature comes from Australia and New Zealand, were Indigenous populations were a significant focus. The review highlights the need for more qualitative and quantitative research, especially in underrepresented ethnic groups and jurisdictions outside of Australia and New Zealand.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities.
Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas.
The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.