直肠上动脉栓塞治疗1 ~ 3级内痔的疗效:临床研究的系统回顾

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mustafa Al Jnainati, Niharika Ikkurthy, Mohammad Ayoub, Areeba Shahid, Mirza Taha Baig, Muhammad Iltaf, Jana Al Jnainati
{"title":"直肠上动脉栓塞治疗1 ~ 3级内痔的疗效:临床研究的系统回顾","authors":"Mustafa Al Jnainati, Niharika Ikkurthy, Mohammad Ayoub, Areeba Shahid, Mirza Taha Baig, Muhammad Iltaf, Jana Al Jnainati","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04944-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superior rectal artery embolization (\"Emborrhoid\") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids when office therapies fail or surgery is undesirable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed and Embase were searched (Jan 2014-Jan 2024). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and applied RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Prespecified outcomes were technical success, clinical success (≥ 2-point fall in bleeding score or equivalent), adverse events, and recurrence. Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; results were narratively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies encompassing 810 procedures qualified. Technical success reached 93-100%. Clinical success ranged from 63 to 94%, yielding marked bleeding control and symptom relief. Reported complications were mild and self-limited (pelvic discomfort, nausea, and low-grade fever); no ischemic injury, continence disturbance, or mortality occurred. Recurrence necessitating repeat treatment affected 8-20% of patients, usually when collateral arterial supply persisted. Patient-reported satisfaction exceeded 80% in every series. Only two small, heterogeneous comparative studies versus rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy were available, precluding a pooled analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests Emborrhoid is a safe, effective bridge between office procedures and surgery-particularly valuable for frail or anticoagulated patients. Yet small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity. Multicenter randomized studies with harmonized outcomes and ≥ 24-month follow-up are required to confirm long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and optimal patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Al Jnainati, Niharika Ikkurthy, Mohammad Ayoub, Areeba Shahid, Mirza Taha Baig, Muhammad Iltaf, Jana Al Jnainati\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00384-025-04944-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superior rectal artery embolization (\\\"Emborrhoid\\\") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids when office therapies fail or surgery is undesirable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed and Embase were searched (Jan 2014-Jan 2024). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and applied RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Prespecified outcomes were technical success, clinical success (≥ 2-point fall in bleeding score or equivalent), adverse events, and recurrence. Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; results were narratively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies encompassing 810 procedures qualified. Technical success reached 93-100%. Clinical success ranged from 63 to 94%, yielding marked bleeding control and symptom relief. Reported complications were mild and self-limited (pelvic discomfort, nausea, and low-grade fever); no ischemic injury, continence disturbance, or mortality occurred. Recurrence necessitating repeat treatment affected 8-20% of patients, usually when collateral arterial supply persisted. Patient-reported satisfaction exceeded 80% in every series. Only two small, heterogeneous comparative studies versus rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy were available, precluding a pooled analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests Emborrhoid is a safe, effective bridge between office procedures and surgery-particularly valuable for frail or anticoagulated patients. Yet small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity. Multicenter randomized studies with harmonized outcomes and ≥ 24-month follow-up are required to confirm long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and optimal patient selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04944-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04944-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当办公室治疗失败或不希望手术时,直肠上动脉栓塞(“Emborrhoid”)为I-III级内痔提供了一种基于导管的替代治疗方法。方法:按照PRISMA 2020检索PubMed和Embase(2014年1月- 2024年1月)。两名审稿人独立筛选记录,提取数据,并应用RoB 2、ROBINS-I或改编的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。预先指定的结果包括技术成功、临床成功(出血评分下降≥2分或同等水平)、不良事件和复发。实质性异质性阻碍meta分析;对结果进行叙述性综合。结果:包括810例手术在内的22项研究合格。技术成功率达到93-100%。临床成功率从63%到94%不等,取得了明显的出血控制和症状缓解。报告的并发症是轻度和自限性的(盆腔不适、恶心和低烧);无缺血性损伤、失禁障碍或死亡发生。8-20%的患者复发需要重复治疗,通常是在侧支动脉供应持续的情况下。每个系列的患者满意度都超过80%。只有两个小的,异质比较研究橡皮筋结扎或硬化治疗,排除了合并分析。结论:目前的证据表明,痔疮是办公室手术和外科手术之间安全、有效的桥梁,对体弱或抗凝患者尤其有价值。然而,小的单中心队列、不同的技术和稀少的正面试验限制了外部有效性。需要有统一结果和≥24个月随访的多中心随机研究来确认长期疗效、成本效益和最佳患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies.

Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies.

Background: Superior rectal artery embolization ("Emborrhoid") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids when office therapies fail or surgery is undesirable.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed and Embase were searched (Jan 2014-Jan 2024). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and applied RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Prespecified outcomes were technical success, clinical success (≥ 2-point fall in bleeding score or equivalent), adverse events, and recurrence. Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; results were narratively synthesized.

Results: Twenty-two studies encompassing 810 procedures qualified. Technical success reached 93-100%. Clinical success ranged from 63 to 94%, yielding marked bleeding control and symptom relief. Reported complications were mild and self-limited (pelvic discomfort, nausea, and low-grade fever); no ischemic injury, continence disturbance, or mortality occurred. Recurrence necessitating repeat treatment affected 8-20% of patients, usually when collateral arterial supply persisted. Patient-reported satisfaction exceeded 80% in every series. Only two small, heterogeneous comparative studies versus rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy were available, precluding a pooled analysis.

Conclusions: Current evidence suggests Emborrhoid is a safe, effective bridge between office procedures and surgery-particularly valuable for frail or anticoagulated patients. Yet small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity. Multicenter randomized studies with harmonized outcomes and ≥ 24-month follow-up are required to confirm long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and optimal patient selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信