Giorgio Bogani, Luigi De Vitis, Andrea Mariani, Francesco Multinu, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Fabio Ghezzi, Caterina Borso, Lilliana Galli, Carlotta Caia, Filippo Ferrari, Andrea Giannini, Enrico Vizza, Giuseppe Cucinella, Vito Chiantera, Violante Di Donato, Francesca Falcone, Mario Malzoni, Salvatore Lopez, Gennaro Cormio, Francesco Raspagliesi, Jvan Casarin
{"title":"保留生育能力的方法在子宫内膜样II级子宫内膜癌中的作用:分子分类。","authors":"Giorgio Bogani, Luigi De Vitis, Andrea Mariani, Francesco Multinu, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Fabio Ghezzi, Caterina Borso, Lilliana Galli, Carlotta Caia, Filippo Ferrari, Andrea Giannini, Enrico Vizza, Giuseppe Cucinella, Vito Chiantera, Violante Di Donato, Francesca Falcone, Mario Malzoni, Salvatore Lopez, Gennaro Cormio, Francesco Raspagliesi, Jvan Casarin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether molecular classification could support individualized selection of patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer for fertility-sparing approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective multi-institutional study. Data of patients undergoing fertility-sparing treatment with a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (with or without oral hormonal therapy) were retrieved. Surrogate molecular classification was used to categorize patients into 4 classes: (1) POLE-mutated, (2) mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, (3) p53 abnormal, and (4) no specific molecular profile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, data from 23 patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt were retrieved. The median patient age was 36 (range; 30-41) years. All patients underwent hysteroscopic-guided endometrial biopsies. Hysteroscopic resection of the tumor was performed in 9 (39.1%) patients. According to surrogate molecular classification, 1 (4.3%), 2 (8.7%), 3 (13.1%), and 17 (73.9%) patients were classified as POLE-mutated, p53 abnormal, mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, and no specific molecular profile, respectively. Molecular classification was not associated with 6-month response rates (p = .080) nor with best response rates (p = .366). Overall, 7 women attempted to achieve a pregnancy; 3 underwent in vitro fertilization. Three patients achieved a pregnancy (1 first-trimester miscarriage and 2 term live births). A total of 10 (43.4%) patients were diagnosed with progressive disease during hysteroscopic surveillance. Overall, 19 (82.6%) patients required hysterectomy. Three (13%) patients required adjuvant therapy for the presence of locally advanced disease (1 stage II, and 2 stage III). Over a median (range) follow-up of 28.7(8.2-91.1) months, no recurrence or disease-related death occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than 10% of women with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt achieve a term pregnancy. In our series, molecular classification did not influence response rate. Further collaborative registers are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 10","pages":"102035"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fertility-sparing approach in endometrioid grade II endometrial cancer: the role of molecular classification.\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Bogani, Luigi De Vitis, Andrea Mariani, Francesco Multinu, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Fabio Ghezzi, Caterina Borso, Lilliana Galli, Carlotta Caia, Filippo Ferrari, Andrea Giannini, Enrico Vizza, Giuseppe Cucinella, Vito Chiantera, Violante Di Donato, Francesca Falcone, Mario Malzoni, Salvatore Lopez, Gennaro Cormio, Francesco Raspagliesi, Jvan Casarin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether molecular classification could support individualized selection of patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer for fertility-sparing approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective multi-institutional study. Data of patients undergoing fertility-sparing treatment with a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (with or without oral hormonal therapy) were retrieved. Surrogate molecular classification was used to categorize patients into 4 classes: (1) POLE-mutated, (2) mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, (3) p53 abnormal, and (4) no specific molecular profile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, data from 23 patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt were retrieved. The median patient age was 36 (range; 30-41) years. All patients underwent hysteroscopic-guided endometrial biopsies. Hysteroscopic resection of the tumor was performed in 9 (39.1%) patients. According to surrogate molecular classification, 1 (4.3%), 2 (8.7%), 3 (13.1%), and 17 (73.9%) patients were classified as POLE-mutated, p53 abnormal, mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, and no specific molecular profile, respectively. Molecular classification was not associated with 6-month response rates (p = .080) nor with best response rates (p = .366). Overall, 7 women attempted to achieve a pregnancy; 3 underwent in vitro fertilization. Three patients achieved a pregnancy (1 first-trimester miscarriage and 2 term live births). A total of 10 (43.4%) patients were diagnosed with progressive disease during hysteroscopic surveillance. Overall, 19 (82.6%) patients required hysterectomy. Three (13%) patients required adjuvant therapy for the presence of locally advanced disease (1 stage II, and 2 stage III). Over a median (range) follow-up of 28.7(8.2-91.1) months, no recurrence or disease-related death occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than 10% of women with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt achieve a term pregnancy. In our series, molecular classification did not influence response rate. Further collaborative registers are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\"35 10\",\"pages\":\"102035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fertility-sparing approach in endometrioid grade II endometrial cancer: the role of molecular classification.
Objective: To investigate whether molecular classification could support individualized selection of patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer for fertility-sparing approaches.
Methods: This is a retrospective multi-institutional study. Data of patients undergoing fertility-sparing treatment with a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (with or without oral hormonal therapy) were retrieved. Surrogate molecular classification was used to categorize patients into 4 classes: (1) POLE-mutated, (2) mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, (3) p53 abnormal, and (4) no specific molecular profile.
Results: Overall, data from 23 patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt were retrieved. The median patient age was 36 (range; 30-41) years. All patients underwent hysteroscopic-guided endometrial biopsies. Hysteroscopic resection of the tumor was performed in 9 (39.1%) patients. According to surrogate molecular classification, 1 (4.3%), 2 (8.7%), 3 (13.1%), and 17 (73.9%) patients were classified as POLE-mutated, p53 abnormal, mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, and no specific molecular profile, respectively. Molecular classification was not associated with 6-month response rates (p = .080) nor with best response rates (p = .366). Overall, 7 women attempted to achieve a pregnancy; 3 underwent in vitro fertilization. Three patients achieved a pregnancy (1 first-trimester miscarriage and 2 term live births). A total of 10 (43.4%) patients were diagnosed with progressive disease during hysteroscopic surveillance. Overall, 19 (82.6%) patients required hysterectomy. Three (13%) patients required adjuvant therapy for the presence of locally advanced disease (1 stage II, and 2 stage III). Over a median (range) follow-up of 28.7(8.2-91.1) months, no recurrence or disease-related death occurred.
Conclusions: Less than 10% of women with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt achieve a term pregnancy. In our series, molecular classification did not influence response rate. Further collaborative registers are needed.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.