Léa Solh Dost, Bertrand Guignard, Giacomo Gastaldi, Aveen Hasan Hamzo, Mathieu Nendaz, Marie-Claude Audétat, Marie P Schneider
{"title":"社区药剂师对出院处方的实践和临床推理:一项使用模拟和回顾性思考方法的研究。","authors":"Léa Solh Dost, Bertrand Guignard, Giacomo Gastaldi, Aveen Hasan Hamzo, Mathieu Nendaz, Marie-Claude Audétat, Marie P Schneider","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01978-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The roles of community pharmacists have evolved from dispensing medications to clinical decision makers. This shift requires a clearer understanding of pharmacists' clinical reasoning. Managing hospital discharge prescriptions requires analytical reasoning to ensure patient safety through medication reconciliation and patient education.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed community pharmacists' practices and their clinical reasoning towards hospital discharge prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed-method study consisted of two phases. First, community pharmacists participated in a simulated encounter in their pharmacy, where a patient presented a discharge prescription. Their practices and the structure of the encounter were assessed using a structured checklist of practices adapted from the MEDICODE checklist. Following the simulation, participants verbalised their thought processes in a retrospective think-aloud session. These semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed using both inductive and deductive qualitative methods. Charlin et al.'s model was used to assess clinical reasoning, while the Calgary-Cambridge model evaluated communication structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14 participating pharmacists, 13 performed medication reconciliation, and 10 contacted the simulated prescriber to address discrepancies. While most provided adherence aids, only seven assessed non-adherence, and five actively collaborated with the patient. Pharmacists exhibited diverse interview structures, often revisiting previous discussion points. Clinical reasoning misconceptions, such as assumptions or premature closure, were observed at multiple stages of the clinical reasoning process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community pharmacists demonstrate strong medication-related skills but face challenges in clinical reasoning for discharge prescriptions. Clinical reasoning training, semi-structured consultations, and greater patient engagement would help tailor and improve post-discharge care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community pharmacists' practices and clinical reasoning towards hospital discharge prescription: a study using simulations and retrospective think-aloud methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Léa Solh Dost, Bertrand Guignard, Giacomo Gastaldi, Aveen Hasan Hamzo, Mathieu Nendaz, Marie-Claude Audétat, Marie P Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-025-01978-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The roles of community pharmacists have evolved from dispensing medications to clinical decision makers. This shift requires a clearer understanding of pharmacists' clinical reasoning. Managing hospital discharge prescriptions requires analytical reasoning to ensure patient safety through medication reconciliation and patient education.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed community pharmacists' practices and their clinical reasoning towards hospital discharge prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed-method study consisted of two phases. First, community pharmacists participated in a simulated encounter in their pharmacy, where a patient presented a discharge prescription. Their practices and the structure of the encounter were assessed using a structured checklist of practices adapted from the MEDICODE checklist. Following the simulation, participants verbalised their thought processes in a retrospective think-aloud session. These semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed using both inductive and deductive qualitative methods. Charlin et al.'s model was used to assess clinical reasoning, while the Calgary-Cambridge model evaluated communication structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14 participating pharmacists, 13 performed medication reconciliation, and 10 contacted the simulated prescriber to address discrepancies. While most provided adherence aids, only seven assessed non-adherence, and five actively collaborated with the patient. Pharmacists exhibited diverse interview structures, often revisiting previous discussion points. Clinical reasoning misconceptions, such as assumptions or premature closure, were observed at multiple stages of the clinical reasoning process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community pharmacists demonstrate strong medication-related skills but face challenges in clinical reasoning for discharge prescriptions. Clinical reasoning training, semi-structured consultations, and greater patient engagement would help tailor and improve post-discharge care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01978-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01978-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Community pharmacists' practices and clinical reasoning towards hospital discharge prescription: a study using simulations and retrospective think-aloud methodology.
Background: The roles of community pharmacists have evolved from dispensing medications to clinical decision makers. This shift requires a clearer understanding of pharmacists' clinical reasoning. Managing hospital discharge prescriptions requires analytical reasoning to ensure patient safety through medication reconciliation and patient education.
Aim: This study assessed community pharmacists' practices and their clinical reasoning towards hospital discharge prescriptions.
Method: This mixed-method study consisted of two phases. First, community pharmacists participated in a simulated encounter in their pharmacy, where a patient presented a discharge prescription. Their practices and the structure of the encounter were assessed using a structured checklist of practices adapted from the MEDICODE checklist. Following the simulation, participants verbalised their thought processes in a retrospective think-aloud session. These semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed using both inductive and deductive qualitative methods. Charlin et al.'s model was used to assess clinical reasoning, while the Calgary-Cambridge model evaluated communication structure.
Results: Among 14 participating pharmacists, 13 performed medication reconciliation, and 10 contacted the simulated prescriber to address discrepancies. While most provided adherence aids, only seven assessed non-adherence, and five actively collaborated with the patient. Pharmacists exhibited diverse interview structures, often revisiting previous discussion points. Clinical reasoning misconceptions, such as assumptions or premature closure, were observed at multiple stages of the clinical reasoning process.
Conclusion: Community pharmacists demonstrate strong medication-related skills but face challenges in clinical reasoning for discharge prescriptions. Clinical reasoning training, semi-structured consultations, and greater patient engagement would help tailor and improve post-discharge care.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences.
IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy.
IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy .
Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.