比较听力损失合并耳鸣患者、单独听力损失患者和对照组的听力努力。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Zahra Iran Pour Mobarakeh, Vida Rahimi, Elham Tavanai, Marzieh Amiri, Reza Faryadras, Hashir Aazh
{"title":"比较听力损失合并耳鸣患者、单独听力损失患者和对照组的听力努力。","authors":"Zahra Iran Pour Mobarakeh, Vida Rahimi, Elham Tavanai, Marzieh Amiri, Reza Faryadras, Hashir Aazh","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2547939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared listening effort (LE) in adults with tinnitus and hearing loss (HL+Tin), hearing loss alone (HL), and a control group (Control).</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>A case-control study involved 78 adults (aged 20-60). Participants underwent pure tone audiometry, the depression, anxiety, stress scale (DASS-21), speech-in-noise test (Quick-SIN), and Stroop test. The Quick-SIN and Stroop tests were taken twice, separately and simultaneously (dual-task paradigm). LE was derived from Stroop test outcomes, measuring selective attention (SA) and reaction time (RT) in dual-task versus baseline conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences emerged in PTA, age, or DASS-21 scores between HL+Tin and HL groups. However, HL+Tin showed higher LE than HL for SA (<i>Padj</i> = 0.049) and RT (<i>Padj</i> = 0.047) with neutral words, but not emotional words (<i>Padj</i> = 0.283, 0.117). For the tinnitus group, regression analyses identified age, depression, and tinnitus severity (THI scores) as significant LE predictors, with age and THI most influential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LE is shaped by age, psychological distress, and tinnitus severity, suggesting integrated management of psychological and tinnitus-related factors to ease the cognitive load in listening tasks. Age and THI were consistently associated with greater LE across both SA and RT tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing listening effort among patients with hearing loss combined with tinnitus, hearing loss alone and a control group.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Iran Pour Mobarakeh, Vida Rahimi, Elham Tavanai, Marzieh Amiri, Reza Faryadras, Hashir Aazh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2025.2547939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared listening effort (LE) in adults with tinnitus and hearing loss (HL+Tin), hearing loss alone (HL), and a control group (Control).</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>A case-control study involved 78 adults (aged 20-60). Participants underwent pure tone audiometry, the depression, anxiety, stress scale (DASS-21), speech-in-noise test (Quick-SIN), and Stroop test. The Quick-SIN and Stroop tests were taken twice, separately and simultaneously (dual-task paradigm). LE was derived from Stroop test outcomes, measuring selective attention (SA) and reaction time (RT) in dual-task versus baseline conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences emerged in PTA, age, or DASS-21 scores between HL+Tin and HL groups. However, HL+Tin showed higher LE than HL for SA (<i>Padj</i> = 0.049) and RT (<i>Padj</i> = 0.047) with neutral words, but not emotional words (<i>Padj</i> = 0.283, 0.117). For the tinnitus group, regression analyses identified age, depression, and tinnitus severity (THI scores) as significant LE predictors, with age and THI most influential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LE is shaped by age, psychological distress, and tinnitus severity, suggesting integrated management of psychological and tinnitus-related factors to ease the cognitive load in listening tasks. Age and THI were consistently associated with greater LE across both SA and RT tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2547939\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2547939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了成人耳鸣合并听力损失(HL+Tin)、单纯听力损失(HL)和对照组(control)的听力努力(LE)。设计和研究样本:一项病例对照研究,涉及78名成年人(20-60岁)。参与者进行了纯音听力测量、抑郁、焦虑、压力量表(DASS-21)、噪音语音测试(Quick-SIN)和Stroop测试。Quick-SIN和Stroop测试分别和同时进行两次(双任务范式)。LE来源于Stroop测试结果,测量双任务条件下与基线条件下的选择性注意(SA)和反应时间(RT)。结果:HL+Tin组与HL组在PTA、年龄、DASS-21评分方面无显著差异。HL+Tin对中性词SA (Padj = 0.049)和RT (Padj = 0.047)的LE均高于HL (Padj = 0.283, 0.117)。对于耳鸣组,回归分析发现年龄、抑郁和耳鸣严重程度(THI评分)是显著的LE预测因子,其中年龄和THI影响最大。结论:LE受年龄、心理困扰和耳鸣严重程度的影响,建议综合管理心理和耳鸣相关因素以减轻听力任务中的认知负荷。在SA和RT任务中,年龄和THI始终与较大的LE相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing listening effort among patients with hearing loss combined with tinnitus, hearing loss alone and a control group.

Objective: This study compared listening effort (LE) in adults with tinnitus and hearing loss (HL+Tin), hearing loss alone (HL), and a control group (Control).

Design and study sample: A case-control study involved 78 adults (aged 20-60). Participants underwent pure tone audiometry, the depression, anxiety, stress scale (DASS-21), speech-in-noise test (Quick-SIN), and Stroop test. The Quick-SIN and Stroop tests were taken twice, separately and simultaneously (dual-task paradigm). LE was derived from Stroop test outcomes, measuring selective attention (SA) and reaction time (RT) in dual-task versus baseline conditions.

Results: No significant differences emerged in PTA, age, or DASS-21 scores between HL+Tin and HL groups. However, HL+Tin showed higher LE than HL for SA (Padj = 0.049) and RT (Padj = 0.047) with neutral words, but not emotional words (Padj = 0.283, 0.117). For the tinnitus group, regression analyses identified age, depression, and tinnitus severity (THI scores) as significant LE predictors, with age and THI most influential.

Conclusions: LE is shaped by age, psychological distress, and tinnitus severity, suggesting integrated management of psychological and tinnitus-related factors to ease the cognitive load in listening tasks. Age and THI were consistently associated with greater LE across both SA and RT tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信