多巴酚丁胺管理:标准化方法的建议。

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Lorenzo Calabró, Filippo Annoni, Fabio Silvio Taccone
{"title":"多巴酚丁胺管理:标准化方法的建议。","authors":"Lorenzo Calabró, Filippo Annoni, Fabio Silvio Taccone","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00804-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dobutamine is the most commonly used inotropic agent in critically ill patients with impaired cardiac contractility. However, its benefit-risk profile remains debated, and clear, structured guidance for its use is lacking. This hypothesis proposes a pragmatic framework for dobutamine administration to promote rational and consistent clinical and experimental practice. The aim is to propose a rational and reproducible use of inotropic therapy with dobutamine in both clinical and experimental settings in cases of shock with low cardiac output, particularly cardiogenic shock, septic shock with septic cardiomyopathy, and low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery (LCOS). Dobutamine should be prescribed only in the presence of acute circulatory failure with signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and impaired cardiac contractility. A low cardiac index (CI) alone does not mandate inotrope initiation. Echocardiography is essential for initial assessment but should be complemented by continuous cardiac output monitoring for evaluating dose-response. The recommended starting dose is 2.5 μg/kg*min, with stepwise titration based on CI and perfusion markers reassessed every 20 min. A significant CI increase and resolution of hypoperfusion should guide further escalation. Persistent hypoperfusion despite CI improvement may indicate inadequate response and justify cautious dose increases, while continued hypoperfusion with further CI rise suggests a flow-independent deficit, discouraging further titration. Dobutamine should be used with clear indications, guided by a standardized approach integrating continuous hemodynamic and perfusion monitoring. This strategy may help optimize therapeutic benefit while minimizing unnecessary exposure and adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dobutamine administration: a proposal for a standardized approach.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Calabró, Filippo Annoni, Fabio Silvio Taccone\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-025-00804-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dobutamine is the most commonly used inotropic agent in critically ill patients with impaired cardiac contractility. However, its benefit-risk profile remains debated, and clear, structured guidance for its use is lacking. This hypothesis proposes a pragmatic framework for dobutamine administration to promote rational and consistent clinical and experimental practice. The aim is to propose a rational and reproducible use of inotropic therapy with dobutamine in both clinical and experimental settings in cases of shock with low cardiac output, particularly cardiogenic shock, septic shock with septic cardiomyopathy, and low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery (LCOS). Dobutamine should be prescribed only in the presence of acute circulatory failure with signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and impaired cardiac contractility. A low cardiac index (CI) alone does not mandate inotrope initiation. Echocardiography is essential for initial assessment but should be complemented by continuous cardiac output monitoring for evaluating dose-response. The recommended starting dose is 2.5 μg/kg*min, with stepwise titration based on CI and perfusion markers reassessed every 20 min. A significant CI increase and resolution of hypoperfusion should guide further escalation. Persistent hypoperfusion despite CI improvement may indicate inadequate response and justify cautious dose increases, while continued hypoperfusion with further CI rise suggests a flow-independent deficit, discouraging further titration. Dobutamine should be used with clear indications, guided by a standardized approach integrating continuous hemodynamic and perfusion monitoring. This strategy may help optimize therapeutic benefit while minimizing unnecessary exposure and adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00804-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00804-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多巴酚丁胺是心脏收缩功能受损的危重病人最常用的肌力药物。然而,它的收益-风险状况仍然存在争议,并且缺乏清晰,结构化的使用指导。这一假设提出了一个实用的多巴酚丁胺给药框架,以促进合理和一致的临床和实验实践。目的是在临床和实验环境中,对低心输出量的休克,特别是心源性休克、感染性休克合并感染性心肌病和心脏手术后低心输出量综合征(LCOS)的病例,提出一种合理和可重复的使用多巴酚丁胺的肌力疗法。多巴酚丁胺只能在急性循环衰竭伴有外周灌注不足和心脏收缩力受损的情况下使用。单纯的低心脏指数(CI)并不要求开始肌力锻炼。超声心动图是必要的初步评估,但应补充连续心输出量监测,以评估剂量反应。推荐起始剂量为2.5 μg/kg*min,每20 min根据CI和灌注指标逐步滴定。CI显著升高和灌注不足的解决应指导进一步升级。尽管CI改善,但持续的低灌注可能表明反应不足,需要谨慎增加剂量,而CI进一步升高,持续的低灌注提示血流无关的缺陷,不鼓励进一步滴定。多巴酚丁胺的使用应有明确的适应症,在标准化方法的指导下,结合持续的血流动力学和灌注监测。这种策略可能有助于优化治疗效果,同时最大限度地减少不必要的暴露和不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dobutamine administration: a proposal for a standardized approach.

Dobutamine administration: a proposal for a standardized approach.

Dobutamine is the most commonly used inotropic agent in critically ill patients with impaired cardiac contractility. However, its benefit-risk profile remains debated, and clear, structured guidance for its use is lacking. This hypothesis proposes a pragmatic framework for dobutamine administration to promote rational and consistent clinical and experimental practice. The aim is to propose a rational and reproducible use of inotropic therapy with dobutamine in both clinical and experimental settings in cases of shock with low cardiac output, particularly cardiogenic shock, septic shock with septic cardiomyopathy, and low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery (LCOS). Dobutamine should be prescribed only in the presence of acute circulatory failure with signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and impaired cardiac contractility. A low cardiac index (CI) alone does not mandate inotrope initiation. Echocardiography is essential for initial assessment but should be complemented by continuous cardiac output monitoring for evaluating dose-response. The recommended starting dose is 2.5 μg/kg*min, with stepwise titration based on CI and perfusion markers reassessed every 20 min. A significant CI increase and resolution of hypoperfusion should guide further escalation. Persistent hypoperfusion despite CI improvement may indicate inadequate response and justify cautious dose increases, while continued hypoperfusion with further CI rise suggests a flow-independent deficit, discouraging further titration. Dobutamine should be used with clear indications, guided by a standardized approach integrating continuous hemodynamic and perfusion monitoring. This strategy may help optimize therapeutic benefit while minimizing unnecessary exposure and adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信