症状性颈动脉狭窄的紧急处理:文献综述。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Francesca Santoro, Marco Sferruzzi, Nunzio Montelione, Vincenzo Catanese, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Francesco Spinelli, Francesco Stilo, Vincenzo DI Lazzaro, Fabio Pilato
{"title":"症状性颈动脉狭窄的紧急处理:文献综述。","authors":"Francesca Santoro, Marco Sferruzzi, Nunzio Montelione, Vincenzo Catanese, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Francesco Spinelli, Francesco Stilo, Vincenzo DI Lazzaro, Fabio Pilato","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05446-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there is a consensus on the role of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid stenosis, the optimal timing of surgery and its role in the context of acute stroke remain controversial. This study aims to review the key factors influencing treatment decisions, including patient characteristics, anatomical considerations, imaging findings and procedural risks associated with acute carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). We performed a narrative review of the existing literature to summarize current evidence on the indications, timing, and outcomes of CEA and CAS in patients with recent ischemic stroke related to carotid stenosis. 86 articles were identified. After reviewing 10 studies were included in the review. The primary outcome evaluated in all studies was the perioperative day stroke/death rate. Although some discrepancies were found among the studies, CEA showed a stroke/death rate ranging from approximately 1.3% within the first 7 days to 3.6% after 7 days. In contrast, CAS had a higher rate in the early period (8.3%) compared to later (7.1%), highlighting an increased risk of CAS within the first 7 days. Managing symptomatic carotid stenosis requires a careful, individualized approach considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, and the timing of surgery. Early intervention is beneficial, but patient-specific risk factors must be weighed carefully.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"44 4","pages":"330-340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urgent management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a critical review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Santoro, Marco Sferruzzi, Nunzio Montelione, Vincenzo Catanese, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Francesco Spinelli, Francesco Stilo, Vincenzo DI Lazzaro, Fabio Pilato\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05446-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although there is a consensus on the role of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid stenosis, the optimal timing of surgery and its role in the context of acute stroke remain controversial. This study aims to review the key factors influencing treatment decisions, including patient characteristics, anatomical considerations, imaging findings and procedural risks associated with acute carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). We performed a narrative review of the existing literature to summarize current evidence on the indications, timing, and outcomes of CEA and CAS in patients with recent ischemic stroke related to carotid stenosis. 86 articles were identified. After reviewing 10 studies were included in the review. The primary outcome evaluated in all studies was the perioperative day stroke/death rate. Although some discrepancies were found among the studies, CEA showed a stroke/death rate ranging from approximately 1.3% within the first 7 days to 3.6% after 7 days. In contrast, CAS had a higher rate in the early period (8.3%) compared to later (7.1%), highlighting an increased risk of CAS within the first 7 days. Managing symptomatic carotid stenosis requires a careful, individualized approach considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, and the timing of surgery. Early intervention is beneficial, but patient-specific risk factors must be weighed carefully.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"330-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05446-X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05446-X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对颈动脉内膜切除术在症状性颈动脉狭窄中的作用已达成共识,但手术的最佳时机及其在急性卒中中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在回顾影响治疗决策的关键因素,包括急性颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)相关的患者特征、解剖学考虑、影像学表现和手术风险。我们对现有文献进行了叙述性回顾,总结了近期颈动脉狭窄相关缺血性卒中患者CEA和CAS的适应症、时机和结局的证据。鉴定出86件物品。回顾后,10项研究被纳入综述。所有研究评估的主要转归是围手术期日卒中/死亡率。虽然在研究中发现了一些差异,但CEA显示,卒中/死亡率在前7天内约为1.3%,7天后约为3.6%。相比之下,早期CAS的发生率(8.3%)高于晚期(7.1%),突出表明在前7天内发生CAS的风险增加。治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄需要考虑患者特点、合并症和手术时机,采取谨慎、个体化的方法。早期干预是有益的,但必须仔细权衡患者特定的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urgent management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a critical review of the literature.

Although there is a consensus on the role of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid stenosis, the optimal timing of surgery and its role in the context of acute stroke remain controversial. This study aims to review the key factors influencing treatment decisions, including patient characteristics, anatomical considerations, imaging findings and procedural risks associated with acute carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). We performed a narrative review of the existing literature to summarize current evidence on the indications, timing, and outcomes of CEA and CAS in patients with recent ischemic stroke related to carotid stenosis. 86 articles were identified. After reviewing 10 studies were included in the review. The primary outcome evaluated in all studies was the perioperative day stroke/death rate. Although some discrepancies were found among the studies, CEA showed a stroke/death rate ranging from approximately 1.3% within the first 7 days to 3.6% after 7 days. In contrast, CAS had a higher rate in the early period (8.3%) compared to later (7.1%), highlighting an increased risk of CAS within the first 7 days. Managing symptomatic carotid stenosis requires a careful, individualized approach considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, and the timing of surgery. Early intervention is beneficial, but patient-specific risk factors must be weighed carefully.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信