颈动脉内膜切除术中交叉夹持神经不耐受后转作颈动脉支架植入术:这是一个安全的选择吗?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Arkadiusz Migdalski, Arkadiusz Jawień
{"title":"颈动脉内膜切除术中交叉夹持神经不耐受后转作颈动脉支架植入术:这是一个安全的选择吗?","authors":"Arkadiusz Migdalski, Arkadiusz Jawień","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05453-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the case of intolerance to cross-clamping (CC) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the method-of-choice is to place a shunt and continue the procedure. However, some centers abandon open carotid revascularization in case of CC intolerance and perform conversion to carotid artery stenting (CAS). This approach remains controversial and is not accepted by many clinicians.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched for reports published over the last 15 years (2010-2025) regarding conversion to CAS after neurological intolerance to CC during CEA.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Carotid CC intolerance may develop in around 10% of patients undergoing CEA under locoregional anesthesia. There is some evidence that patients who develop CC intolerance may have higher degrees of contralateral carotid stenosis and a higher incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular events compared with individuals who do not develop neurological symptoms after CC. Conversion to CAS may be an alternative to usage of a shunt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The occurrence of carotid CC intolerance during CEA may be a reason to abandon the procedure and convert to CAS. Nonetheless, the evidence on this topic is not robust, as it is based on small, single-center studies. A multicenter study may provide better-quality evidence in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"44 4","pages":"311-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversion to carotid artery stenting after neurological intolerance at cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy: is it a safe option?\",\"authors\":\"Arkadiusz Migdalski, Arkadiusz Jawień\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05453-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the case of intolerance to cross-clamping (CC) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the method-of-choice is to place a shunt and continue the procedure. However, some centers abandon open carotid revascularization in case of CC intolerance and perform conversion to carotid artery stenting (CAS). This approach remains controversial and is not accepted by many clinicians.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched for reports published over the last 15 years (2010-2025) regarding conversion to CAS after neurological intolerance to CC during CEA.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Carotid CC intolerance may develop in around 10% of patients undergoing CEA under locoregional anesthesia. There is some evidence that patients who develop CC intolerance may have higher degrees of contralateral carotid stenosis and a higher incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular events compared with individuals who do not develop neurological symptoms after CC. Conversion to CAS may be an alternative to usage of a shunt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The occurrence of carotid CC intolerance during CEA may be a reason to abandon the procedure and convert to CAS. Nonetheless, the evidence on this topic is not robust, as it is based on small, single-center studies. A multicenter study may provide better-quality evidence in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"311-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05453-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05453-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)中,如果不耐受交叉夹持(CC),选择的方法是放置分流器并继续手术。然而,一些中心在CC不耐受的情况下放弃开放颈动脉重建术,转而进行颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)。这种方法仍有争议,不被许多临床医生接受。证据获取:检索PubMed, Embase, Web of Science和Cochrane数据库,检索过去15年(2010-2025年)发表的关于CEA期间CC神经不耐受后转化为CAS的报告。证据综合:约10%的CEA患者在局部麻醉下可发生颈动脉CC不耐受。有证据表明,与CC后未出现神经系统症状的患者相比,发生CC不耐受的患者可能有更高程度的对侧颈动脉狭窄和更高的围手术期脑血管事件发生率。转换为CAS可能是使用分流器的替代方案。结论:CEA期间颈动脉CC不耐受的发生可能是放弃手术而改用CAS的原因。然而,关于这个话题的证据并不可靠,因为它是基于小的、单中心的研究。多中心研究可能在未来提供更高质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conversion to carotid artery stenting after neurological intolerance at cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy: is it a safe option?

Introduction: In the case of intolerance to cross-clamping (CC) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the method-of-choice is to place a shunt and continue the procedure. However, some centers abandon open carotid revascularization in case of CC intolerance and perform conversion to carotid artery stenting (CAS). This approach remains controversial and is not accepted by many clinicians.

Evidence acquisition: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched for reports published over the last 15 years (2010-2025) regarding conversion to CAS after neurological intolerance to CC during CEA.

Evidence synthesis: Carotid CC intolerance may develop in around 10% of patients undergoing CEA under locoregional anesthesia. There is some evidence that patients who develop CC intolerance may have higher degrees of contralateral carotid stenosis and a higher incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular events compared with individuals who do not develop neurological symptoms after CC. Conversion to CAS may be an alternative to usage of a shunt.

Conclusions: The occurrence of carotid CC intolerance during CEA may be a reason to abandon the procedure and convert to CAS. Nonetheless, the evidence on this topic is not robust, as it is based on small, single-center studies. A multicenter study may provide better-quality evidence in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信