经颈动脉重建术在症状性颈动脉狭窄中的作用。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Christos D Liapis, Georgios Tzavellas
{"title":"经颈动脉重建术在症状性颈动脉狭窄中的作用。","authors":"Christos D Liapis, Georgios Tzavellas","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05450-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid artery stenosis is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke, particularly in symptomatic patients. While carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has traditionally been the gold standard for management, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. TCAR combines direct carotid access with flow reversal technology to reduce embolic risk mainly from the aortic arch. This review examines the current evidence regarding the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of TCAR in symptomatic carotid stenosis, comparing it with CEA and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed/Medline was searched for studies evaluating the efficacy of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Search terms used included 'transcarotid artery revascularization', 'TCAR', 'symptomatic carotid stenosis' and 'stroke' in various combinations.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 187 articles were considered for inclusion in this narrative review. An overview of the TCAR technique, as well as its main advantages and limitations is presented. The clinical evidence from TCAR studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses is discussed. The indications of TCAR for symptomatic patients are reported based on the recommendations of the 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Finally, patient selection criteria, procedural considerations, and future directions for TCAR in the management of symptomatic carotid disease are analyzed and discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCAR has demonstrated promising results for the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The main disadvantage of TCAR is its high cost compared with CEA. Hopefully, the cost-effectiveness of TCAR will improve in the future, thus further increasing its use and applications for the invasive management of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"44 4","pages":"316-322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of transcarotid artery revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Christos D Liapis, Georgios Tzavellas\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05450-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid artery stenosis is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke, particularly in symptomatic patients. While carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has traditionally been the gold standard for management, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. TCAR combines direct carotid access with flow reversal technology to reduce embolic risk mainly from the aortic arch. This review examines the current evidence regarding the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of TCAR in symptomatic carotid stenosis, comparing it with CEA and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed/Medline was searched for studies evaluating the efficacy of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Search terms used included 'transcarotid artery revascularization', 'TCAR', 'symptomatic carotid stenosis' and 'stroke' in various combinations.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 187 articles were considered for inclusion in this narrative review. An overview of the TCAR technique, as well as its main advantages and limitations is presented. The clinical evidence from TCAR studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses is discussed. The indications of TCAR for symptomatic patients are reported based on the recommendations of the 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Finally, patient selection criteria, procedural considerations, and future directions for TCAR in the management of symptomatic carotid disease are analyzed and discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCAR has demonstrated promising results for the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The main disadvantage of TCAR is its high cost compared with CEA. Hopefully, the cost-effectiveness of TCAR will improve in the future, thus further increasing its use and applications for the invasive management of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"316-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05450-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05450-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈动脉狭窄是缺血性脑卒中的重要危险因素,特别是在有症状的患者中。虽然颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)传统上是治疗的金标准,经颈动脉重建术(TCAR)已成为一种微创替代方法。TCAR结合了颈动脉直接通路和血流逆转技术来降低主要来自主动脉弓的栓塞风险。本文回顾了目前关于TCAR治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄的安全性、有效性和长期预后的证据,并将其与CEA和经股颈动脉支架置入(TFCAS)进行了比较。证据获取:PubMed/Medline检索了评价TCAR对症状性颈动脉狭窄患者疗效的研究。搜索词包括“经颈动脉重建术”、“TCAR”、“症状性颈动脉狭窄”和“中风”的各种组合。证据综合:本叙述性综述共考虑了187篇文章。概述了TCAR技术,以及它的主要优点和局限性。本文讨论了来自TCAR研究、系统综述和荟萃分析的临床证据。TCAR对有症状患者的适应症是根据2022年血管外科学会指南的建议报告的。最后,分析和讨论了TCAR治疗症状性颈动脉疾病的患者选择标准、手术注意事项和未来发展方向。结论:TCAR在治疗有症状和无症状的颈动脉狭窄方面显示出良好的效果。与CEA相比,TCAR的主要缺点是成本高。希望在未来TCAR的成本效益能够得到提高,从而进一步增加其在有创治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄患者中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of transcarotid artery revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke, particularly in symptomatic patients. While carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has traditionally been the gold standard for management, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. TCAR combines direct carotid access with flow reversal technology to reduce embolic risk mainly from the aortic arch. This review examines the current evidence regarding the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of TCAR in symptomatic carotid stenosis, comparing it with CEA and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS).

Evidence acquisition: PubMed/Medline was searched for studies evaluating the efficacy of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Search terms used included 'transcarotid artery revascularization', 'TCAR', 'symptomatic carotid stenosis' and 'stroke' in various combinations.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 187 articles were considered for inclusion in this narrative review. An overview of the TCAR technique, as well as its main advantages and limitations is presented. The clinical evidence from TCAR studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses is discussed. The indications of TCAR for symptomatic patients are reported based on the recommendations of the 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Finally, patient selection criteria, procedural considerations, and future directions for TCAR in the management of symptomatic carotid disease are analyzed and discussed.

Conclusions: TCAR has demonstrated promising results for the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The main disadvantage of TCAR is its high cost compared with CEA. Hopefully, the cost-effectiveness of TCAR will improve in the future, thus further increasing its use and applications for the invasive management of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信