有症状患者颈动脉血运重建术的结果与术前症状、症状时间和改良Rankin量表评分的关系

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jemin Park, Marc L Schermerhorn
{"title":"有症状患者颈动脉血运重建术的结果与术前症状、症状时间和改良Rankin量表评分的关系","authors":"Jemin Park, Marc L Schermerhorn","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05439-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke remains a common cause of death globally, and ischemic strokes make up 87% of all strokes. Carotid disease is implicated in 10-15% of ischemic strokes, and the treatment of choice has historically been a carotid endarterectomy (CEA), first described in the 1950s. However, recent advanced techniques such as transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), introduced in the 1990s, and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), introduced in the 2010s, have altered this landscape. In this article, we explore the history of the different modalities and focus on outcomes in symptomatic patients based on their preoperative symptoms, timing from symptoms, and stroke severity using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We conducted a focused overview of articles that reported outcomes of the three modalities based on preoperative symptom status, timing of symptoms, and mRS Score.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>When patients were stratified on pre-procedural symptoms (stroke, hemispheric TIA, ocular TIA, or formerly symptomatic) and timing (recent defined as <180 days from event), patients with a recent stroke had the highest 30-day stroke/death rates irrespective of modality. Further, higher preoperative mRS scores were significantly associated with in-hospital stroke/death rates. The highest rates of in-hospital stroke/death occurred in patients undergoing revascularization within the first two days, consistent with SVS guidelines that recommend delaying revascularization until days two to fourteen post-event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no consensus on the ideal carotid revascularization procedure; however, it is prudent to consider the patient's presenting symptoms, timing of symptoms, and potential disability from stroke in deciding between the different modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"44 3","pages":"245-253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of carotid revascularization procedures in symptomatic patients according to preoperative symptoms, timing from symptoms, and modified Rankin Scale Score.\",\"authors\":\"Jemin Park, Marc L Schermerhorn\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05439-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke remains a common cause of death globally, and ischemic strokes make up 87% of all strokes. Carotid disease is implicated in 10-15% of ischemic strokes, and the treatment of choice has historically been a carotid endarterectomy (CEA), first described in the 1950s. However, recent advanced techniques such as transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), introduced in the 1990s, and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), introduced in the 2010s, have altered this landscape. In this article, we explore the history of the different modalities and focus on outcomes in symptomatic patients based on their preoperative symptoms, timing from symptoms, and stroke severity using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We conducted a focused overview of articles that reported outcomes of the three modalities based on preoperative symptom status, timing of symptoms, and mRS Score.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>When patients were stratified on pre-procedural symptoms (stroke, hemispheric TIA, ocular TIA, or formerly symptomatic) and timing (recent defined as <180 days from event), patients with a recent stroke had the highest 30-day stroke/death rates irrespective of modality. Further, higher preoperative mRS scores were significantly associated with in-hospital stroke/death rates. The highest rates of in-hospital stroke/death occurred in patients undergoing revascularization within the first two days, consistent with SVS guidelines that recommend delaying revascularization until days two to fourteen post-event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no consensus on the ideal carotid revascularization procedure; however, it is prudent to consider the patient's presenting symptoms, timing of symptoms, and potential disability from stroke in deciding between the different modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"245-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05439-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05439-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中风仍然是全球常见的死亡原因,缺血性中风占所有中风的87%。颈动脉疾病与10-15%的缺血性中风有关,历史上选择的治疗方法是颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),于20世纪50年代首次提出。然而,最近的先进技术,如20世纪90年代引入的经股颈动脉支架植入术(tfCAS)和2010年代引入的经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR),改变了这一现状。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了不同治疗方式的历史,并根据患者的术前症状、出现症状的时间和卒中严重程度,使用改良的Rankin量表(mRS)评分来关注有症状患者的预后。证据获取:我们对基于术前症状状态、症状出现时间和mRS评分的三种治疗方式的结果进行了重点综述。证据综合:根据术前症状(卒中、半球性TIA、眼部TIA或既往症状)和时机(最近定义为结论)对患者进行分层时:对于理想的颈动脉重建术尚未达成共识;然而,在决定不同的手术方式时,应谨慎考虑患者的表现症状、症状发生时间和卒中的潜在残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of carotid revascularization procedures in symptomatic patients according to preoperative symptoms, timing from symptoms, and modified Rankin Scale Score.

Introduction: Stroke remains a common cause of death globally, and ischemic strokes make up 87% of all strokes. Carotid disease is implicated in 10-15% of ischemic strokes, and the treatment of choice has historically been a carotid endarterectomy (CEA), first described in the 1950s. However, recent advanced techniques such as transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), introduced in the 1990s, and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), introduced in the 2010s, have altered this landscape. In this article, we explore the history of the different modalities and focus on outcomes in symptomatic patients based on their preoperative symptoms, timing from symptoms, and stroke severity using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score.

Evidence acquisition: We conducted a focused overview of articles that reported outcomes of the three modalities based on preoperative symptom status, timing of symptoms, and mRS Score.

Evidence synthesis: When patients were stratified on pre-procedural symptoms (stroke, hemispheric TIA, ocular TIA, or formerly symptomatic) and timing (recent defined as <180 days from event), patients with a recent stroke had the highest 30-day stroke/death rates irrespective of modality. Further, higher preoperative mRS scores were significantly associated with in-hospital stroke/death rates. The highest rates of in-hospital stroke/death occurred in patients undergoing revascularization within the first two days, consistent with SVS guidelines that recommend delaying revascularization until days two to fourteen post-event.

Conclusions: There is no consensus on the ideal carotid revascularization procedure; however, it is prudent to consider the patient's presenting symptoms, timing of symptoms, and potential disability from stroke in deciding between the different modalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信