利用ddPCR优化血液恶性肿瘤和败血症的临床指标:一项回顾性研究。

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s40121-025-01207-1
Bei Zheng, Chuanwei Xin, Yizhuo Liu, Enhui Lv, Hong Jiang, Wenjuan Yang, Yuxia Jiang, Bo Yang, Huifang Jiang, Meiling Zhang, Yuexing Tu
{"title":"利用ddPCR优化血液恶性肿瘤和败血症的临床指标:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Bei Zheng, Chuanwei Xin, Yizhuo Liu, Enhui Lv, Hong Jiang, Wenjuan Yang, Yuxia Jiang, Bo Yang, Huifang Jiang, Meiling Zhang, Yuexing Tu","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01207-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early antibacterial treatment is critical for patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and sepsis. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) can rapidly detect pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, but its clinical value in HMs is unknown. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the role of ddPCR in diagnosis, clinical outcomes, and antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2023 to March 2025, 400 patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and sepsis were enrolled in the study. Of these, 150 received both ddPCR and blood culture (BC), while 250 underwent BC alone. Using propensity score matching (PSM), as well as subgroup and sensitivity analyses, we evaluated ten indicators, including 28-day mortality, treatment efficacy, and antibiotic use density (AUD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ddPCR showed a 49.33% positive rate (vs. BC's 17.50%, P < 0.01) with a 4.06-h diagnostic turnaround (vs. 72.47 h for BC, P < 0.01), achieving 70.37% sensitivity and 55.28% specificity. The ddPCR group had lower 28-day mortality (HR = 0.55, P = 0.01), higher clinical response rates, and greater inflammatory marker decline. Antimicrobial optimization via ddPCR improved efficacy to 85.11%, with reduced AUD (OR = - 28.93, P < 0.01), the quantity and proportion of combined antimicrobial usage. However, a non-significant difference was observed in the proportion of antibacterial treatment costs (P = 0.14). PSM and sensitivity analysis results were consistent, indicating data robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ddPCR outperforms BC in diagnostic efficiency for patients with HMs and sepsis, accelerating pathogen and AMR genes identification, optimizing antibacterial therapy and management, improving clinical effectiveness, and reducing 28-day all-cause mortality. The findings support the application of ddPCR in immunosuppressed populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"2299-2320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Clinical Indicators in Hematologic Malignancies and Sepsis Using ddPCR: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bei Zheng, Chuanwei Xin, Yizhuo Liu, Enhui Lv, Hong Jiang, Wenjuan Yang, Yuxia Jiang, Bo Yang, Huifang Jiang, Meiling Zhang, Yuexing Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-025-01207-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early antibacterial treatment is critical for patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and sepsis. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) can rapidly detect pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, but its clinical value in HMs is unknown. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the role of ddPCR in diagnosis, clinical outcomes, and antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2023 to March 2025, 400 patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and sepsis were enrolled in the study. Of these, 150 received both ddPCR and blood culture (BC), while 250 underwent BC alone. Using propensity score matching (PSM), as well as subgroup and sensitivity analyses, we evaluated ten indicators, including 28-day mortality, treatment efficacy, and antibiotic use density (AUD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ddPCR showed a 49.33% positive rate (vs. BC's 17.50%, P < 0.01) with a 4.06-h diagnostic turnaround (vs. 72.47 h for BC, P < 0.01), achieving 70.37% sensitivity and 55.28% specificity. The ddPCR group had lower 28-day mortality (HR = 0.55, P = 0.01), higher clinical response rates, and greater inflammatory marker decline. Antimicrobial optimization via ddPCR improved efficacy to 85.11%, with reduced AUD (OR = - 28.93, P < 0.01), the quantity and proportion of combined antimicrobial usage. However, a non-significant difference was observed in the proportion of antibacterial treatment costs (P = 0.14). PSM and sensitivity analysis results were consistent, indicating data robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ddPCR outperforms BC in diagnostic efficiency for patients with HMs and sepsis, accelerating pathogen and AMR genes identification, optimizing antibacterial therapy and management, improving clinical effectiveness, and reducing 28-day all-cause mortality. The findings support the application of ddPCR in immunosuppressed populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2299-2320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480348/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01207-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01207-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期抗菌治疗对血液恶性肿瘤(HMs)和败血症患者至关重要。液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)可以快速检测病原菌和抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)基因,但其在HMs中的临床应用价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统地评估ddPCR在诊断、临床结果和抗菌药物管理中的作用。方法:从2023年1月至2025年3月,400例血液恶性肿瘤(HMs)和脓毒症患者入组研究。其中150人同时接受了ddPCR和血培养(BC), 250人单独接受了BC。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以及亚组和敏感性分析,我们评估了10项指标,包括28天死亡率、治疗疗效和抗生素使用密度(AUD)。结果:ddPCR阳性率为49.33% (BC为17.50%),P结论:ddPCR对HMs和脓毒症患者的诊断效率优于BC,加速了病原菌和AMR基因的鉴定,优化了抗菌治疗和管理,提高了临床疗效,降低了28天全因死亡率。这些发现支持了ddPCR在免疫抑制人群中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Clinical Indicators in Hematologic Malignancies and Sepsis Using ddPCR: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Early antibacterial treatment is critical for patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and sepsis. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) can rapidly detect pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, but its clinical value in HMs is unknown. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the role of ddPCR in diagnosis, clinical outcomes, and antimicrobial stewardship.

Methods: From January 2023 to March 2025, 400 patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and sepsis were enrolled in the study. Of these, 150 received both ddPCR and blood culture (BC), while 250 underwent BC alone. Using propensity score matching (PSM), as well as subgroup and sensitivity analyses, we evaluated ten indicators, including 28-day mortality, treatment efficacy, and antibiotic use density (AUD).

Results: ddPCR showed a 49.33% positive rate (vs. BC's 17.50%, P < 0.01) with a 4.06-h diagnostic turnaround (vs. 72.47 h for BC, P < 0.01), achieving 70.37% sensitivity and 55.28% specificity. The ddPCR group had lower 28-day mortality (HR = 0.55, P = 0.01), higher clinical response rates, and greater inflammatory marker decline. Antimicrobial optimization via ddPCR improved efficacy to 85.11%, with reduced AUD (OR = - 28.93, P < 0.01), the quantity and proportion of combined antimicrobial usage. However, a non-significant difference was observed in the proportion of antibacterial treatment costs (P = 0.14). PSM and sensitivity analysis results were consistent, indicating data robustness.

Conclusions: ddPCR outperforms BC in diagnostic efficiency for patients with HMs and sepsis, accelerating pathogen and AMR genes identification, optimizing antibacterial therapy and management, improving clinical effectiveness, and reducing 28-day all-cause mortality. The findings support the application of ddPCR in immunosuppressed populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信