氯己定万古霉素浸渍敷料预防中心静脉导管相关感染的随机试验

IF 2.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Giovanna Cerri Lessa, Carolina Comitti Zanella, Gustavo Pessatto Krause, Alexandre Moreira Senter, Paula Hansen Suss, Gabriel Burato Ortis, Thyago Proenca de Moraes, Felipe Francisco Tuon
{"title":"氯己定万古霉素浸渍敷料预防中心静脉导管相关感染的随机试验","authors":"Giovanna Cerri Lessa, Carolina Comitti Zanella, Gustavo Pessatto Krause, Alexandre Moreira Senter, Paula Hansen Suss, Gabriel Burato Ortis, Thyago Proenca de Moraes, Felipe Francisco Tuon","doi":"10.3390/idr17040102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in intensive care units (ICUs) for monitoring and administering treatments; however, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are significant complications, leading to severe outcomes and increased healthcare costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a simple and inexpensive impregnated dressing (intervention) compared to a non-impregnated dressing in reducing catheter-related infections among critically ill patients using vancomycin and chlorhexidine. <b>Methods</b>: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in a university hospital in Brazil with 207 beds from June 2022 to October 2023. Patients over 18 years old admitted to the ICU and needing a CVC for a period exceeding 72 h were included. A CVC inserted outside the ICU and the need for two CVCs in the same patient simultaneously were exclusion criteria. One group received an impregnated dressing (intervention) compared to the other group, which received a standard dressing (comparator). The incidence of CRBSIs and the microbiological outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was CRBSI. <b>Results</b>: The clinical trial included 516 patients randomized to receive either the new antimicrobial dressing or a control dressing. The dressing significantly reduced CVC colonization but not CRBSI rates. <b>Conclusions</b>: This new dressing provides enhanced antimicrobial protection but does not decrease CRBSI incidence. Future studies should further explore the cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12386552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dressing Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Vancomycin for the Prophylaxis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections-A Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna Cerri Lessa, Carolina Comitti Zanella, Gustavo Pessatto Krause, Alexandre Moreira Senter, Paula Hansen Suss, Gabriel Burato Ortis, Thyago Proenca de Moraes, Felipe Francisco Tuon\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/idr17040102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in intensive care units (ICUs) for monitoring and administering treatments; however, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are significant complications, leading to severe outcomes and increased healthcare costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a simple and inexpensive impregnated dressing (intervention) compared to a non-impregnated dressing in reducing catheter-related infections among critically ill patients using vancomycin and chlorhexidine. <b>Methods</b>: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in a university hospital in Brazil with 207 beds from June 2022 to October 2023. Patients over 18 years old admitted to the ICU and needing a CVC for a period exceeding 72 h were included. A CVC inserted outside the ICU and the need for two CVCs in the same patient simultaneously were exclusion criteria. One group received an impregnated dressing (intervention) compared to the other group, which received a standard dressing (comparator). The incidence of CRBSIs and the microbiological outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was CRBSI. <b>Results</b>: The clinical trial included 516 patients randomized to receive either the new antimicrobial dressing or a control dressing. The dressing significantly reduced CVC colonization but not CRBSI rates. <b>Conclusions</b>: This new dressing provides enhanced antimicrobial protection but does not decrease CRBSI incidence. Future studies should further explore the cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits of this approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12386552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17040102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17040102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中心静脉导管(CVCs)在重症监护病房(icu)用于监测和管理治疗是必不可少的;然而,导管相关性血流感染(crbsi)是严重的并发症,可导致严重后果并增加医疗成本。本研究的目的是评估在使用万古霉素和氯己定的危重患者中,一种简单且廉价的浸渍敷料(干预)与非浸渍敷料在减少导管相关感染方面的有效性。方法:这是一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验,于2022年6月至2023年10月在巴西一所大学医院进行,共有207个床位。18岁以上入住ICU且需要CVC时间超过72小时的患者纳入。排除标准是在ICU外插入CVC,并在同一患者同时需要两个CVC。一组接受浸渍敷料(干预),另一组接受标准敷料(比较物)。评估crbsi的发生率和微生物学结果。主要终点为CRBSI。结果:临床试验纳入516例患者,随机接受新型抗菌敷料或对照敷料。敷料显著降低了CVC定植,但没有降低CRBSI率。结论:这种新型敷料提供了增强的抗菌保护,但没有降低CRBSI的发生率。未来的研究应进一步探讨这种方法的成本效益和长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dressing Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Vancomycin for the Prophylaxis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections-A Randomized Trial.

Dressing Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Vancomycin for the Prophylaxis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections-A Randomized Trial.

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in intensive care units (ICUs) for monitoring and administering treatments; however, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are significant complications, leading to severe outcomes and increased healthcare costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a simple and inexpensive impregnated dressing (intervention) compared to a non-impregnated dressing in reducing catheter-related infections among critically ill patients using vancomycin and chlorhexidine. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in a university hospital in Brazil with 207 beds from June 2022 to October 2023. Patients over 18 years old admitted to the ICU and needing a CVC for a period exceeding 72 h were included. A CVC inserted outside the ICU and the need for two CVCs in the same patient simultaneously were exclusion criteria. One group received an impregnated dressing (intervention) compared to the other group, which received a standard dressing (comparator). The incidence of CRBSIs and the microbiological outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was CRBSI. Results: The clinical trial included 516 patients randomized to receive either the new antimicrobial dressing or a control dressing. The dressing significantly reduced CVC colonization but not CRBSI rates. Conclusions: This new dressing provides enhanced antimicrobial protection but does not decrease CRBSI incidence. Future studies should further explore the cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits of this approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信