补救性化疗对复发和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后生存结果的作用

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.14100
Daisuke Abe, Takayuki Kimura, Satoru Koike, Hisatomo Tamaki, Sayumi Konya, Maya Kawamoto, Masahiro Umemoto, Mitsuo Sato, Mutsukazu Kitano, Takahiro Wakasaki, Ryuji Yasumatsu
{"title":"补救性化疗对复发和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后生存结果的作用","authors":"Daisuke Abe, Takayuki Kimura, Satoru Koike, Hisatomo Tamaki, Sayumi Konya, Maya Kawamoto, Masahiro Umemoto, Mitsuo Sato, Mutsukazu Kitano, Takahiro Wakasaki, Ryuji Yasumatsu","doi":"10.21873/invivo.14100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, it remains a matter of debate which patient populations derive clinical benefit from salvage chemotherapy (SCT) following disease progression after ICI therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 97 patients with R/M HNSCC who received ICI therapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). Patients were classified into SCT (n=54) and non-SCT (n=43) groups after ICI failure. Survival outcomes, response rates, and clinical variables were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SCT group showed a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the non-SCT group (16.6 <i>vs.</i> 2.4 months, <i>p</i><0.0001). These findings indicate that patients who received SCT had markedly better outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified SCT [hazard ratio (HR)=4.93, <i>p</i><0.00001] and ECOG PS0,1 (HR=2.42, <i>p</i>=0.0257) as independent prognostic factors for OS. Patients treated with paclitaxel plus cetuximab (PTX + Cmab) had higher objective response rate (ORR) (50%) and disease control rate (DCR) (68.4%) compared to other regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCT after ICI failure significantly improves survival in R/M HNSCC, particularly when using PTX+Cmab. Patients who received SCT had substantially better outcomes than those who did not. ECOG PS and sarcopenia status should be considered in treatment selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 5","pages":"2993-3000"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Salvage Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Abe, Takayuki Kimura, Satoru Koike, Hisatomo Tamaki, Sayumi Konya, Maya Kawamoto, Masahiro Umemoto, Mitsuo Sato, Mutsukazu Kitano, Takahiro Wakasaki, Ryuji Yasumatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.14100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, it remains a matter of debate which patient populations derive clinical benefit from salvage chemotherapy (SCT) following disease progression after ICI therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 97 patients with R/M HNSCC who received ICI therapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). Patients were classified into SCT (n=54) and non-SCT (n=43) groups after ICI failure. Survival outcomes, response rates, and clinical variables were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SCT group showed a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the non-SCT group (16.6 <i>vs.</i> 2.4 months, <i>p</i><0.0001). These findings indicate that patients who received SCT had markedly better outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified SCT [hazard ratio (HR)=4.93, <i>p</i><0.00001] and ECOG PS0,1 (HR=2.42, <i>p</i>=0.0257) as independent prognostic factors for OS. Patients treated with paclitaxel plus cetuximab (PTX + Cmab) had higher objective response rate (ORR) (50%) and disease control rate (DCR) (68.4%) compared to other regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCT after ICI failure significantly improves survival in R/M HNSCC, particularly when using PTX+Cmab. Patients who received SCT had substantially better outcomes than those who did not. ECOG PS and sarcopenia status should be considered in treatment selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"2993-3000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在复发性和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M HNSCC)中已经证明了临床疗效。然而,在ICI治疗后疾病进展后,哪些患者群体从补救性化疗(SCT)中获得临床益处仍然存在争议。患者和方法:这项回顾性研究包括97例接受ICI治疗(纳武单抗或派姆单抗)的R/M型HNSCC患者。患者在ICI失败后分为SCT组(n=54)和非SCT组(n=43)。比较两组间的生存结局、有效率和临床变量。结果:与非SCT组相比,SCT组的中位总生存期(OS)明显更长(16.6个月vs 2.4个月,ppp=0.0257),这是OS的独立预后因素。与其他方案相比,紫杉醇加西妥昔单抗(PTX + Cmab)治疗的患者具有更高的客观缓解率(ORR)(50%)和疾病控制率(DCR)(68.4%)。结论:ICI失败后的SCT显著提高了R/M型HNSCC的生存率,特别是当使用PTX+Cmab时。接受SCT的患者比未接受SCT的患者有更好的结果。在选择治疗方案时应考虑ECOG - PS和肌肉减少症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Role of Salvage Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The Role of Salvage Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The Role of Salvage Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The Role of Salvage Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background/aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, it remains a matter of debate which patient populations derive clinical benefit from salvage chemotherapy (SCT) following disease progression after ICI therapy.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 97 patients with R/M HNSCC who received ICI therapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). Patients were classified into SCT (n=54) and non-SCT (n=43) groups after ICI failure. Survival outcomes, response rates, and clinical variables were compared between groups.

Results: The SCT group showed a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the non-SCT group (16.6 vs. 2.4 months, p<0.0001). These findings indicate that patients who received SCT had markedly better outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified SCT [hazard ratio (HR)=4.93, p<0.00001] and ECOG PS0,1 (HR=2.42, p=0.0257) as independent prognostic factors for OS. Patients treated with paclitaxel plus cetuximab (PTX + Cmab) had higher objective response rate (ORR) (50%) and disease control rate (DCR) (68.4%) compared to other regimens.

Conclusion: SCT after ICI failure significantly improves survival in R/M HNSCC, particularly when using PTX+Cmab. Patients who received SCT had substantially better outcomes than those who did not. ECOG PS and sarcopenia status should be considered in treatment selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信