生物配体模型对底栖生物毒性阈值和沉积物管理地点金属补救目标的发展的评价。

IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Robert W Gensemer, Bjorn Bjorkman, Robert C Santore, Aaron D Redman, Steven S Brown
{"title":"生物配体模型对底栖生物毒性阈值和沉积物管理地点金属补救目标的发展的评价。","authors":"Robert W Gensemer, Bjorn Bjorkman, Robert C Santore, Aaron D Redman, Steven S Brown","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A combined risk assessment and risk management framework is proposed for application of a multimetal Biotic Ligand Model (mBLM) to develop bulk sediment remedial goals for metals in sediments. Sediment chemistry and toxicity data from five freshwater sediment study areas were compiled to illustrate how this framework could be applied. Based on these data, the mBLM accurately predicted Hyalella azteca toxicity in 85.3% of the samples with respect to H. azteca 20% effect concentrations (EC20s), and in 75.1% of the samples with respect to derived final chronic values (FCVs). The sum of porewater toxic units derived using the mBLM were converted to a bulk sediment remedial goal concentration (CBSRG) using empirical partitioning relationships between metals in sediments and porewater. A median of the CBSRG values in samples with mBLM-FCV ∑ toxic units (TU) > 1 was used as a first approximation of an overall bulk sediment remedial action level (RAL) to identify sediments most in need for remedial action based on the presence of bioavailable metals in porewater in each study area. Bulk sediment RALs ultimately reflected the relative bioavailability of metals in porewater. Where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively low, RALs were higher than bulk sediment remedial goals. Conversely, where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively high, RALs were lower than bulk sediment remedial goals. There is more uncertainty where porewater metal bioavailability was not the primary driver of toxicity as evidenced by low mBLM TU, and a high % of false negative toxicity predictions. We conclude that for sediments in which porewater metal bioavailability is the primary contributor to benthic toxicity, porewater-based remedial goals derived using the mBLM can be used to derive bulk sediment remedial goals that are practical for making site remediation decisions yet still reflect metal bioavailability in porewater.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Biotic Ligand Model for The Development of Benthic Toxicity Thresholds and Remedial Goals for Metals at Sediment Management Sites.\",\"authors\":\"Robert W Gensemer, Bjorn Bjorkman, Robert C Santore, Aaron D Redman, Steven S Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/inteam/vjaf118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A combined risk assessment and risk management framework is proposed for application of a multimetal Biotic Ligand Model (mBLM) to develop bulk sediment remedial goals for metals in sediments. Sediment chemistry and toxicity data from five freshwater sediment study areas were compiled to illustrate how this framework could be applied. Based on these data, the mBLM accurately predicted Hyalella azteca toxicity in 85.3% of the samples with respect to H. azteca 20% effect concentrations (EC20s), and in 75.1% of the samples with respect to derived final chronic values (FCVs). The sum of porewater toxic units derived using the mBLM were converted to a bulk sediment remedial goal concentration (CBSRG) using empirical partitioning relationships between metals in sediments and porewater. A median of the CBSRG values in samples with mBLM-FCV ∑ toxic units (TU) > 1 was used as a first approximation of an overall bulk sediment remedial action level (RAL) to identify sediments most in need for remedial action based on the presence of bioavailable metals in porewater in each study area. Bulk sediment RALs ultimately reflected the relative bioavailability of metals in porewater. Where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively low, RALs were higher than bulk sediment remedial goals. Conversely, where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively high, RALs were lower than bulk sediment remedial goals. There is more uncertainty where porewater metal bioavailability was not the primary driver of toxicity as evidenced by low mBLM TU, and a high % of false negative toxicity predictions. We conclude that for sediments in which porewater metal bioavailability is the primary contributor to benthic toxicity, porewater-based remedial goals derived using the mBLM can be used to derive bulk sediment remedial goals that are practical for making site remediation decisions yet still reflect metal bioavailability in porewater.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一个综合风险评估和风险管理框架,用于应用多金属生物配体模型(mBLM)制定沉积物中金属的大块沉积物修复目标。来自五个淡水沉积物研究区的沉积物化学和毒性数据被汇编以说明如何应用这一框架。基于这些数据,mBLM准确预测了85.3%样品中阿兹特克透明菌20%效应浓度(EC20s)的毒性,以及75.1%样品中衍生最终慢性值(fcv)的毒性。利用mBLM导出的孔隙水毒性单位之和,利用沉积物和孔隙水中金属之间的经验分配关系,将其转换为总体沉积物补救目标浓度(CBSRG)。采用mBLM-FCV样品中CBSRG值的中位数∑toxic units (TU) bbb101作为总体散装沉积物补救作用水平(RAL)的第一个近似值,根据每个研究区域孔隙水中生物可利用金属的存在来确定最需要补救措施的沉积物。大块沉积物RALs最终反映了孔隙水中金属的相对生物利用度。在金属孔隙水生物利用度相对较低的地方,RALs高于大块沉积物的补救目标。相反,在金属孔隙水生物利用度相对较高的地方,RALs低于大块沉积物的补救目标。更不确定的是,孔隙水金属的生物利用度并不是毒性的主要驱动因素,如低mBLM TU和高百分比的假阴性毒性预测所证明的那样。我们得出的结论是,对于孔隙水金属生物利用度是底栖生物毒性的主要因素的沉积物,使用mBLM得出的基于孔隙水的补救目标可以用来得出总体沉积物补救目标,这些目标对于制定现场补救决策是实用的,但仍然反映了孔隙水中金属的生物利用度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Biotic Ligand Model for The Development of Benthic Toxicity Thresholds and Remedial Goals for Metals at Sediment Management Sites.

A combined risk assessment and risk management framework is proposed for application of a multimetal Biotic Ligand Model (mBLM) to develop bulk sediment remedial goals for metals in sediments. Sediment chemistry and toxicity data from five freshwater sediment study areas were compiled to illustrate how this framework could be applied. Based on these data, the mBLM accurately predicted Hyalella azteca toxicity in 85.3% of the samples with respect to H. azteca 20% effect concentrations (EC20s), and in 75.1% of the samples with respect to derived final chronic values (FCVs). The sum of porewater toxic units derived using the mBLM were converted to a bulk sediment remedial goal concentration (CBSRG) using empirical partitioning relationships between metals in sediments and porewater. A median of the CBSRG values in samples with mBLM-FCV ∑ toxic units (TU) > 1 was used as a first approximation of an overall bulk sediment remedial action level (RAL) to identify sediments most in need for remedial action based on the presence of bioavailable metals in porewater in each study area. Bulk sediment RALs ultimately reflected the relative bioavailability of metals in porewater. Where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively low, RALs were higher than bulk sediment remedial goals. Conversely, where metal porewater bioavailability was relatively high, RALs were lower than bulk sediment remedial goals. There is more uncertainty where porewater metal bioavailability was not the primary driver of toxicity as evidenced by low mBLM TU, and a high % of false negative toxicity predictions. We conclude that for sediments in which porewater metal bioavailability is the primary contributor to benthic toxicity, porewater-based remedial goals derived using the mBLM can be used to derive bulk sediment remedial goals that are practical for making site remediation decisions yet still reflect metal bioavailability in porewater.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信