老年住院患者虚弱与潜在不适当药物使用之间的关系:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.14099
Yukako Morisaki, Ayako Maeda-Minami, Masaki Sato, Sayaka Izumi, Masanori Suzuki, Ryohkan Funakoshi, Yasunari Mano
{"title":"老年住院患者虚弱与潜在不适当药物使用之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Yukako Morisaki, Ayako Maeda-Minami, Masaki Sato, Sayaka Izumi, Masanori Suzuki, Ryohkan Funakoshi, Yasunari Mano","doi":"10.21873/invivo.14099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>In a super-aging society, understanding frailty and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is crucial for appropriate drug use in older persons. This study evaluated the association between frailty and PIMs in elderly hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients ≥65 years who were admitted to Kameda Medical Center between October 2016 and 2017 were included. Frailty was defined as a Barthel Index <90 or Mini-Mental State Examination <18; patients not meeting these criteria were classified as non-frail. PIMs were defined according to the 2015 Beers Criteria. When PIMs were used at least once during hospitalization, patients were defined as PIM users; otherwise, they were defined as non-users. PIM users in both the frail and non-frail groups were compared through logistic regression analysis by adjusting for background factors and calculating adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. As a sensitivity analysis, the frail group was subdivided into those with mild frailty and those with severe frailty, and the proportion of PIM users with mild frailty, severe frailty, and those without frailty were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of PIM users did not significantly differ between the groups with and without frailty (adjusted odds ratio=1.29, 95% confidence interval=0.84-1.98). As a result of sensitivity analysis, the proportion of PIM use was significantly higher in the group with severe frailty than in the non-frail group (adjusted odds ratio=12.0, 95% confidence interval=1.76-81.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no significant difference in PIM use between frail and non-frail elderly Japanese inpatients. However, sensitivity analysis revealed higher PIM use in those with severe frailty than in those who were non-frail. Therefore, this result implies that patients with severe frailty must be prescribed drugs appropriately, taking into account the background of each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 5","pages":"2986-2992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Frailty and Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yukako Morisaki, Ayako Maeda-Minami, Masaki Sato, Sayaka Izumi, Masanori Suzuki, Ryohkan Funakoshi, Yasunari Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.14099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>In a super-aging society, understanding frailty and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is crucial for appropriate drug use in older persons. This study evaluated the association between frailty and PIMs in elderly hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients ≥65 years who were admitted to Kameda Medical Center between October 2016 and 2017 were included. Frailty was defined as a Barthel Index <90 or Mini-Mental State Examination <18; patients not meeting these criteria were classified as non-frail. PIMs were defined according to the 2015 Beers Criteria. When PIMs were used at least once during hospitalization, patients were defined as PIM users; otherwise, they were defined as non-users. PIM users in both the frail and non-frail groups were compared through logistic regression analysis by adjusting for background factors and calculating adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. As a sensitivity analysis, the frail group was subdivided into those with mild frailty and those with severe frailty, and the proportion of PIM users with mild frailty, severe frailty, and those without frailty were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of PIM users did not significantly differ between the groups with and without frailty (adjusted odds ratio=1.29, 95% confidence interval=0.84-1.98). As a result of sensitivity analysis, the proportion of PIM use was significantly higher in the group with severe frailty than in the non-frail group (adjusted odds ratio=12.0, 95% confidence interval=1.76-81.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no significant difference in PIM use between frail and non-frail elderly Japanese inpatients. However, sensitivity analysis revealed higher PIM use in those with severe frailty than in those who were non-frail. Therefore, this result implies that patients with severe frailty must be prescribed drugs appropriately, taking into account the background of each patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"2986-2992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396062/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:在超老龄化社会中,了解虚弱和潜在的不适当药物(PIM)使用对于老年人适当使用药物至关重要。本研究评估老年住院患者虚弱与PIMs之间的关系。患者和方法:纳入2016年10月至2017年10月在Kameda医疗中心住院的≥65岁的患者。结果:虚弱组和非虚弱组间PIM使用者比例无显著差异(校正优势比=1.29,95%置信区间=0.84-1.98)。敏感性分析结果显示,重度虚弱组使用PIM的比例明显高于非虚弱组(校正优势比=12.0,95%可信区间=1.76 ~ 81.3)。结论:本研究发现虚弱和非虚弱的日本老年住院患者在PIM的使用上无显著差异。然而,敏感性分析显示,严重虚弱的患者使用PIM的比例高于非虚弱的患者。因此,这一结果表明,严重虚弱的患者必须考虑每个患者的背景,适当地给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association Between Frailty and Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Association Between Frailty and Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Association Between Frailty and Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Association Between Frailty and Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background/aim: In a super-aging society, understanding frailty and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is crucial for appropriate drug use in older persons. This study evaluated the association between frailty and PIMs in elderly hospitalized patients.

Patients and methods: Patients ≥65 years who were admitted to Kameda Medical Center between October 2016 and 2017 were included. Frailty was defined as a Barthel Index <90 or Mini-Mental State Examination <18; patients not meeting these criteria were classified as non-frail. PIMs were defined according to the 2015 Beers Criteria. When PIMs were used at least once during hospitalization, patients were defined as PIM users; otherwise, they were defined as non-users. PIM users in both the frail and non-frail groups were compared through logistic regression analysis by adjusting for background factors and calculating adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. As a sensitivity analysis, the frail group was subdivided into those with mild frailty and those with severe frailty, and the proportion of PIM users with mild frailty, severe frailty, and those without frailty were compared.

Results: The proportion of PIM users did not significantly differ between the groups with and without frailty (adjusted odds ratio=1.29, 95% confidence interval=0.84-1.98). As a result of sensitivity analysis, the proportion of PIM use was significantly higher in the group with severe frailty than in the non-frail group (adjusted odds ratio=12.0, 95% confidence interval=1.76-81.3).

Conclusion: This study found no significant difference in PIM use between frail and non-frail elderly Japanese inpatients. However, sensitivity analysis revealed higher PIM use in those with severe frailty than in those who were non-frail. Therefore, this result implies that patients with severe frailty must be prescribed drugs appropriately, taking into account the background of each patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信