{"title":"评估自我管理干预对亚洲中低收入国家慢性阻塞性肺病结局的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Saroj Adhikari, Srijya Thapa, Cheerawit Rattanapan, Orapin Laosee, Shyamkumar Sriram, Jeevan Bhatta","doi":"10.1186/s12955-025-02382-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) presents a significant health and economic challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, where healthcare resources are often limited. Self-management programs (SMPs) offer a potential solution by empowering patients to manage their condition and reduce healthcare costs. However, there needs to be more consolidated evidence on the effectiveness of these programs in LMICs, and their success may depend on specific contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review analyzed studies on COPD self-management interventions in Asian LMICs, focusing on outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exacerbation rates, healthcare utilization, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Two databases- PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines, and data were extracted and analyzed to identify the effectiveness of these programs and the challenges encountered during implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicate that self-management programs in LMICs can improve HRQoL, reduce exacerbation rates, and lower OOP costs in specific contexts. However, the effectiveness of these programs is influenced by local healthcare infrastructure, digital and health literacy, and economic barriers. Digital interventions tended to be more beneficial in urban areas with better infrastructure, while programs led by community health workers were more effective in rural settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-management interventions show promise for managing COPD in resource-limited settings, but context-specific adaptations are essential. Flexible program designs tailored to local conditions and strengthened collaborations among healthcare providers and policymakers are crucial for sustainable implementation and scaling.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"23 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the impact of self-management interventions on COPD outcomes in low- and middle-income countries in Asia: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Saroj Adhikari, Srijya Thapa, Cheerawit Rattanapan, Orapin Laosee, Shyamkumar Sriram, Jeevan Bhatta\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12955-025-02382-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) presents a significant health and economic challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, where healthcare resources are often limited. Self-management programs (SMPs) offer a potential solution by empowering patients to manage their condition and reduce healthcare costs. However, there needs to be more consolidated evidence on the effectiveness of these programs in LMICs, and their success may depend on specific contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review analyzed studies on COPD self-management interventions in Asian LMICs, focusing on outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exacerbation rates, healthcare utilization, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Two databases- PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines, and data were extracted and analyzed to identify the effectiveness of these programs and the challenges encountered during implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicate that self-management programs in LMICs can improve HRQoL, reduce exacerbation rates, and lower OOP costs in specific contexts. However, the effectiveness of these programs is influenced by local healthcare infrastructure, digital and health literacy, and economic barriers. Digital interventions tended to be more beneficial in urban areas with better infrastructure, while programs led by community health workers were more effective in rural settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-management interventions show promise for managing COPD in resource-limited settings, but context-specific adaptations are essential. Flexible program designs tailored to local conditions and strengthened collaborations among healthcare providers and policymakers are crucial for sustainable implementation and scaling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02382-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02382-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the impact of self-management interventions on COPD outcomes in low- and middle-income countries in Asia: a systematic review.
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) presents a significant health and economic challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, where healthcare resources are often limited. Self-management programs (SMPs) offer a potential solution by empowering patients to manage their condition and reduce healthcare costs. However, there needs to be more consolidated evidence on the effectiveness of these programs in LMICs, and their success may depend on specific contextual factors.
Methods: This systematic review analyzed studies on COPD self-management interventions in Asian LMICs, focusing on outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exacerbation rates, healthcare utilization, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Two databases- PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines, and data were extracted and analyzed to identify the effectiveness of these programs and the challenges encountered during implementation.
Results: The findings indicate that self-management programs in LMICs can improve HRQoL, reduce exacerbation rates, and lower OOP costs in specific contexts. However, the effectiveness of these programs is influenced by local healthcare infrastructure, digital and health literacy, and economic barriers. Digital interventions tended to be more beneficial in urban areas with better infrastructure, while programs led by community health workers were more effective in rural settings.
Conclusion: Self-management interventions show promise for managing COPD in resource-limited settings, but context-specific adaptations are essential. Flexible program designs tailored to local conditions and strengthened collaborations among healthcare providers and policymakers are crucial for sustainable implementation and scaling.
期刊介绍:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.