五次坐立测试的参考值:一项汇总分析,包括来自14个国家的45470名参与者。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jozo Grgic, Brad J Schoenfeld, Andrea B Maier, Zeljko Pedisic
{"title":"五次坐立测试的参考值:一项汇总分析,包括来自14个国家的45470名参与者。","authors":"Jozo Grgic, Brad J Schoenfeld, Andrea B Maier, Zeljko Pedisic","doi":"10.1007/s11357-025-01863-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to establish reference values for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) in a large, population-representative sample from 14 European countries. Data were collected among 45,470 participants aged 50 + years, as part of the 5th wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The reference values for the FTSST were calculated as the 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th, and the 95th weighted percentile. The analyses were stratified by age and sex. For females, the best performance on the FTSST was observed among the 50-54-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 10 s; 95th percentile = 6 s) and the worst among 85-89-year-olds and ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 28 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s). For males, the best performance was observed among the 55-59-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 9 s; 95th percentile = 5 s). The worst performance for males was observed among ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 26 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s), even though the 10th percentile was higher (poorer performance) among 85-89-year-olds. The reference values indicate poorer performance on the test among females and in older age groups. The provided reference values for FTSST can be used for health screening, surveillance, and intervention planning, as they enable an interpretation of test results according to sex and age.</p>","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reference values for the five-times-sit-to-stand test: a pooled analysis including 45,470 participants from 14 countries.\",\"authors\":\"Jozo Grgic, Brad J Schoenfeld, Andrea B Maier, Zeljko Pedisic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11357-025-01863-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to establish reference values for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) in a large, population-representative sample from 14 European countries. Data were collected among 45,470 participants aged 50 + years, as part of the 5th wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The reference values for the FTSST were calculated as the 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th, and the 95th weighted percentile. The analyses were stratified by age and sex. For females, the best performance on the FTSST was observed among the 50-54-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 10 s; 95th percentile = 6 s) and the worst among 85-89-year-olds and ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 28 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s). For males, the best performance was observed among the 55-59-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 9 s; 95th percentile = 5 s). The worst performance for males was observed among ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 26 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s), even though the 10th percentile was higher (poorer performance) among 85-89-year-olds. The reference values indicate poorer performance on the test among females and in older age groups. The provided reference values for FTSST can be used for health screening, surveillance, and intervention planning, as they enable an interpretation of test results according to sex and age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeroScience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeroScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01863-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01863-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在来自14个欧洲国家的具有人口代表性的大型样本中建立五次坐立测试(FTSST)的参考值。作为欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查第五次浪潮的一部分,在45 470名50岁以上的参与者中收集了数据。FTSST的参考值按第5、第10、第20、第30、第40、第50、第60、第70、第80、第90和第95个加权百分位计算。这些分析是按年龄和性别分层的。在女性中,50-54岁的女性在FTSST上表现最好(第5百分位数= 18秒,第50百分位数= 10秒,第95百分位数= 6秒),85-89岁和≥90岁的女性表现最差(第5百分位数= 28秒,第50百分位数= 15秒,第95百分位数= 9秒)。男性中,55-59岁年龄段表现最好(第5百分位= 18秒,第50百分位= 9秒,第95百分位= 5秒)。年龄≥90岁的男性表现最差(第5百分位数= 26秒;第50百分位数= 15秒;第95百分位数= 9秒),尽管第10百分位数在85-89岁的人群中表现更好(表现更差)。参考值表明,女性和年龄较大的群体在测试中的表现较差。提供的FTSST参考值可用于健康筛查、监测和干预计划,因为它们可以根据性别和年龄解释测试结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reference values for the five-times-sit-to-stand test: a pooled analysis including 45,470 participants from 14 countries.

The aim of this study was to establish reference values for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) in a large, population-representative sample from 14 European countries. Data were collected among 45,470 participants aged 50 + years, as part of the 5th wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The reference values for the FTSST were calculated as the 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th, and the 95th weighted percentile. The analyses were stratified by age and sex. For females, the best performance on the FTSST was observed among the 50-54-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 10 s; 95th percentile = 6 s) and the worst among 85-89-year-olds and ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 28 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s). For males, the best performance was observed among the 55-59-year-olds (5th percentile = 18 s; 50th percentile = 9 s; 95th percentile = 5 s). The worst performance for males was observed among ≥ 90-year-olds (5th percentile = 26 s; 50th percentile = 15 s; 95th percentile = 9 s), even though the 10th percentile was higher (poorer performance) among 85-89-year-olds. The reference values indicate poorer performance on the test among females and in older age groups. The provided reference values for FTSST can be used for health screening, surveillance, and intervention planning, as they enable an interpretation of test results according to sex and age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信