碳水化合物抗原125在保留射血分数诊断心力衰竭中的价值。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326053
Javier de Juan Bagudá, Andrea Severo Sánchez, Rafael de la Espriella, María Jesús Valero-Masa, David García-Vega, Marta de Antonio Ferrer, Teresa Segura de la Cal, Anna Mollar, María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena, Luis Martínez-Dolz, Javier de la Cruz, José R González-Juanatey, Manuel Martínez-Sellés, Julio Núñez, Juan F Delgado Jiménez
{"title":"碳水化合物抗原125在保留射血分数诊断心力衰竭中的价值。","authors":"Javier de Juan Bagudá, Andrea Severo Sánchez, Rafael de la Espriella, María Jesús Valero-Masa, David García-Vega, Marta de Antonio Ferrer, Teresa Segura de la Cal, Anna Mollar, María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena, Luis Martínez-Dolz, Javier de la Cruz, José R González-Juanatey, Manuel Martínez-Sellés, Julio Núñez, Juan F Delgado Jiménez","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current evidence supports the role of circulating carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in risk assessment, disease monitoring and therapeutic guidance in heart failure (HF). However, there is limited data on its diagnostic applicability. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CA125 in identifying HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in an outpatient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicentre study involving 246 consecutive patients with clinically suspected HF. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (n=8) and those with a history of malignancy (n=22) were excluded. The final study cohort comprised 210 patients. The diagnosis of HFpEF was confirmed by a trained cardiologist blinded to the biomarker levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study cohort was 69.7±15 years, and 69% were women. Median levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and CA125 were 125 pg/mL (IQR: 51-332) and 11 U/mL (IQR: 8-17), respectively. HFpEF was diagnosed in 65 (31%) patients. For HFpEF diagnosis, NT-proBNP and CA125 levels demonstrated comparable areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves 0.765 (95% CI: 0.686 to 0.843) vs 0.715 (95% CI: 0.636 to 0.793), respectively (p=0.323). Optimal cut points were identified as 12.2 U/mL for CA125 (sensitivity: 0.69; specificity: 0.68) and 243 pg/mL for NT-proBNP (sensitivity: 0.65; specificity: 0.83). Elevated CA125 levels (>23 U/mL, 12.4% of the sample) exhibited high specificity (0.97), a positive predictive value of 80.8% and correctly classified 77.1% of cases as HFpEF. Conversely, CA125 levels<9 U/mL were associated with a high negative predictive value (85.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In an ambulatory setting, CA125 exhibits acceptable diagnostic performance for identifying HFpEF and may complement NT-proBNP in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of carbohydrate antigen 125 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Javier de Juan Bagudá, Andrea Severo Sánchez, Rafael de la Espriella, María Jesús Valero-Masa, David García-Vega, Marta de Antonio Ferrer, Teresa Segura de la Cal, Anna Mollar, María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena, Luis Martínez-Dolz, Javier de la Cruz, José R González-Juanatey, Manuel Martínez-Sellés, Julio Núñez, Juan F Delgado Jiménez\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current evidence supports the role of circulating carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in risk assessment, disease monitoring and therapeutic guidance in heart failure (HF). However, there is limited data on its diagnostic applicability. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CA125 in identifying HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in an outpatient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicentre study involving 246 consecutive patients with clinically suspected HF. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (n=8) and those with a history of malignancy (n=22) were excluded. The final study cohort comprised 210 patients. The diagnosis of HFpEF was confirmed by a trained cardiologist blinded to the biomarker levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study cohort was 69.7±15 years, and 69% were women. Median levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and CA125 were 125 pg/mL (IQR: 51-332) and 11 U/mL (IQR: 8-17), respectively. HFpEF was diagnosed in 65 (31%) patients. For HFpEF diagnosis, NT-proBNP and CA125 levels demonstrated comparable areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves 0.765 (95% CI: 0.686 to 0.843) vs 0.715 (95% CI: 0.636 to 0.793), respectively (p=0.323). Optimal cut points were identified as 12.2 U/mL for CA125 (sensitivity: 0.69; specificity: 0.68) and 243 pg/mL for NT-proBNP (sensitivity: 0.65; specificity: 0.83). Elevated CA125 levels (>23 U/mL, 12.4% of the sample) exhibited high specificity (0.97), a positive predictive value of 80.8% and correctly classified 77.1% of cases as HFpEF. Conversely, CA125 levels<9 U/mL were associated with a high negative predictive value (85.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In an ambulatory setting, CA125 exhibits acceptable diagnostic performance for identifying HFpEF and may complement NT-proBNP in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的证据支持循环碳水化合物抗原125 (CA125)在心力衰竭(HF)的风险评估、疾病监测和治疗指导中的作用。然而,关于其诊断适用性的数据有限。本研究旨在评估CA125在门诊人群中通过保留射血分数(HFpEF)识别HF的诊断性能。方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心研究,涉及246例临床疑似心衰患者。结果:研究队列的平均年龄为69.7±15岁,其中69%为女性。n端前b型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)和CA125的中位水平分别为125 pg/mL (IQR: 51-332)和11 U/mL (IQR: 8-17)。确诊HFpEF患者65例(31%)。对于HFpEF诊断,NT-proBNP和CA125水平在受试者工作特征曲线下分别显示出0.765 (95% CI: 0.686至0.843)和0.715 (95% CI: 0.636至0.793)的可比区域(p=0.323)。CA125的最佳切割点为12.2 U/mL(敏感性:0.69,特异性:0.68),NT-proBNP的最佳切割点为243 pg/mL(敏感性:0.65,特异性:0.83)。CA125水平升高(bb0 23 U/mL, 12.4%的样本)具有高特异性(0.97),阳性预测值为80.8%,正确分类77.1%的病例为HFpEF。结论:在门诊环境中,CA125表现出可接受的HFpEF诊断性能,并可在临床实践中补充NT-proBNP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of carbohydrate antigen 125 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis.

Background: Current evidence supports the role of circulating carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in risk assessment, disease monitoring and therapeutic guidance in heart failure (HF). However, there is limited data on its diagnostic applicability. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CA125 in identifying HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in an outpatient population.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre study involving 246 consecutive patients with clinically suspected HF. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (n=8) and those with a history of malignancy (n=22) were excluded. The final study cohort comprised 210 patients. The diagnosis of HFpEF was confirmed by a trained cardiologist blinded to the biomarker levels.

Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 69.7±15 years, and 69% were women. Median levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and CA125 were 125 pg/mL (IQR: 51-332) and 11 U/mL (IQR: 8-17), respectively. HFpEF was diagnosed in 65 (31%) patients. For HFpEF diagnosis, NT-proBNP and CA125 levels demonstrated comparable areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves 0.765 (95% CI: 0.686 to 0.843) vs 0.715 (95% CI: 0.636 to 0.793), respectively (p=0.323). Optimal cut points were identified as 12.2 U/mL for CA125 (sensitivity: 0.69; specificity: 0.68) and 243 pg/mL for NT-proBNP (sensitivity: 0.65; specificity: 0.83). Elevated CA125 levels (>23 U/mL, 12.4% of the sample) exhibited high specificity (0.97), a positive predictive value of 80.8% and correctly classified 77.1% of cases as HFpEF. Conversely, CA125 levels<9 U/mL were associated with a high negative predictive value (85.7%).

Conclusion: In an ambulatory setting, CA125 exhibits acceptable diagnostic performance for identifying HFpEF and may complement NT-proBNP in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信