低温充氧机灌注不会增加肝移植后感染的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 7.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.21037/hbsn-24-552
Silvia Corcione, Damiano Patrono, Nour Shbaklo, Luca Mirabile, Maria Roberta Fortunato, Tommaso Lupia, Paola Maffezzoli, Antonio Curtoni, Alessandro Bondi, Cristina Costa, Renato Romagnoli, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
{"title":"低温充氧机灌注不会增加肝移植后感染的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Silvia Corcione, Damiano Patrono, Nour Shbaklo, Luca Mirabile, Maria Roberta Fortunato, Tommaso Lupia, Paola Maffezzoli, Antonio Curtoni, Alessandro Bondi, Cristina Costa, Renato Romagnoli, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa","doi":"10.21037/hbsn-24-552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation (LT) is a crucial treatment for end-stage liver disease, but the limited organ supply has led to the use of extended criteria donors (ECD). The implementation of dynamic preservation techniques like hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is crucial in improving outcomes for ECD grafts. However, graft contamination and infection are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of infections within 10 days from LT between HOPE and static cold storage (SCS) groups and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including LT recipients transplanted at a single-center from March 2016 to June 2023. Patients were divided into HOPE and SCS groups, and propensity score matching was used to select comparable cohorts. Data on patient and donor characteristics were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, a cohort of 370 (HOPE, n=185; SCS, n=185) patients was selected for analysis. The study found no significant differences in the rate of clinically relevant infections, microbiological positive samples, or donor-derived infections within 10 days between HOPE and SCS groups. Postoperative outcomes, as well as patient and graft survival, were also similar between the two groups. The study showed that HOPE is a feasible and safe approach, with a comparable risk of infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results indicate that HOPE use in LT does not increase the risk of infection and is associated with similar patient and graft survival outcomes compared to SCS. These findings confirm the safety and efficacy of HOPE in LT and its potential to expand the donor pool without compromising recipient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12878,"journal":{"name":"Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition","volume":"14 4","pages":"562-574"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion does not increase the risk of infection after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Corcione, Damiano Patrono, Nour Shbaklo, Luca Mirabile, Maria Roberta Fortunato, Tommaso Lupia, Paola Maffezzoli, Antonio Curtoni, Alessandro Bondi, Cristina Costa, Renato Romagnoli, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/hbsn-24-552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver transplantation (LT) is a crucial treatment for end-stage liver disease, but the limited organ supply has led to the use of extended criteria donors (ECD). The implementation of dynamic preservation techniques like hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is crucial in improving outcomes for ECD grafts. However, graft contamination and infection are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of infections within 10 days from LT between HOPE and static cold storage (SCS) groups and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including LT recipients transplanted at a single-center from March 2016 to June 2023. Patients were divided into HOPE and SCS groups, and propensity score matching was used to select comparable cohorts. Data on patient and donor characteristics were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, a cohort of 370 (HOPE, n=185; SCS, n=185) patients was selected for analysis. The study found no significant differences in the rate of clinically relevant infections, microbiological positive samples, or donor-derived infections within 10 days between HOPE and SCS groups. Postoperative outcomes, as well as patient and graft survival, were also similar between the two groups. The study showed that HOPE is a feasible and safe approach, with a comparable risk of infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results indicate that HOPE use in LT does not increase the risk of infection and is associated with similar patient and graft survival outcomes compared to SCS. These findings confirm the safety and efficacy of HOPE in LT and its potential to expand the donor pool without compromising recipient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"562-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393111/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-24-552\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-24-552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝移植(LT)是终末期肝病的重要治疗方法,但器官供应有限导致使用延长标准供体(ECD)。低温氧机灌注(HOPE)等动态保存技术的实施对于改善ECD移植物的预后至关重要。然而,移植物污染和感染是一个问题。本研究旨在评估HOPE组和静态冷藏组(SCS)术后10天内感染的风险和术后并发症。方法:回顾性队列研究,包括2016年3月至2023年6月在单中心移植的肝移植受体。将患者分为HOPE组和SCS组,采用倾向评分匹配选择可比队列。分析患者和供体特征数据。结果:倾向评分匹配后,选择370例(HOPE, n=185; SCS, n=185)患者进行分析。研究发现,HOPE组和SCS组在10天内的临床相关感染率、微生物阳性样本或供体来源感染发生率没有显著差异。两组之间的术后结果以及患者和移植物存活率也相似。研究表明,HOPE是一种可行且安全的方法,感染风险相当。结论:研究结果表明,与SCS相比,在LT中使用HOPE不会增加感染的风险,并且与相似的患者和移植物存活结果相关。这些发现证实了HOPE在肝移植中的安全性和有效性,以及它在不影响受体结果的情况下扩大供体池的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion does not increase the risk of infection after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion does not increase the risk of infection after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion does not increase the risk of infection after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion does not increase the risk of infection after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is a crucial treatment for end-stage liver disease, but the limited organ supply has led to the use of extended criteria donors (ECD). The implementation of dynamic preservation techniques like hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is crucial in improving outcomes for ECD grafts. However, graft contamination and infection are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of infections within 10 days from LT between HOPE and static cold storage (SCS) groups and postoperative complications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including LT recipients transplanted at a single-center from March 2016 to June 2023. Patients were divided into HOPE and SCS groups, and propensity score matching was used to select comparable cohorts. Data on patient and donor characteristics were analyzed.

Results: After propensity score matching, a cohort of 370 (HOPE, n=185; SCS, n=185) patients was selected for analysis. The study found no significant differences in the rate of clinically relevant infections, microbiological positive samples, or donor-derived infections within 10 days between HOPE and SCS groups. Postoperative outcomes, as well as patient and graft survival, were also similar between the two groups. The study showed that HOPE is a feasible and safe approach, with a comparable risk of infection.

Conclusions: The study results indicate that HOPE use in LT does not increase the risk of infection and is associated with similar patient and graft survival outcomes compared to SCS. These findings confirm the safety and efficacy of HOPE in LT and its potential to expand the donor pool without compromising recipient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
10.00%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition (HBSN) is a bi-monthly, open-access, peer-reviewed journal (Print ISSN: 2304-3881; Online ISSN: 2304-389X) since December 2012. The journal focuses on hepatopancreatobiliary disease and nutrition, aiming to present new findings and deliver up-to-date, practical information on diagnosis, prevention, and clinical investigations. Areas of interest cover surgical techniques, clinical and basic research, transplantation, therapies, NASH, NAFLD, targeted drugs, gut microbiota, metabolism, cancer immunity, genomics, and nutrition and dietetics. HBSN serves as a valuable resource for professionals seeking insights into diverse aspects of hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信