对再损伤的恐惧限制了PROMIS在增强Broström程序后测量的患者功能结果。

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114251363915
Steven M Hadley, Rachel Bergman, Sarah J Westvold, Tanya Kukreja, Carolyn J Hu, Ryan Filler, Muhammad Y Mutawakkil, Milap Patel, Anish R Kadakia
{"title":"对再损伤的恐惧限制了PROMIS在增强Broström程序后测量的患者功能结果。","authors":"Steven M Hadley, Rachel Bergman, Sarah J Westvold, Tanya Kukreja, Carolyn J Hu, Ryan Filler, Muhammad Y Mutawakkil, Milap Patel, Anish R Kadakia","doi":"10.1177/24730114251363915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of reinjury (FORI) can hinder recovery in several orthopaedic conditions, but its impact after augmented Broström repair is unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence of FORI and its association with functional outcomes in this setting. This study aims to determine whether patients experience FORI following augmented Broström repair and whether FORI impacts functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>80 patients who underwent Broström repair with <i>Internal</i>Brace augmentation were contacted to complete surveys containing questionnaires with Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI), Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), and whether patients experienced current (at time of survey completion) activity limitations due to FORI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>64% (51/80) of patients reported postoperative FORI. Average follow-up was 3.9 years. Fear was associated with worse PF (49.9 ± 7.4 vs 54.9 ± 8.4, <i>P</i> = .01) and worse CAIT (19.1 ± 8.0 vs 23.2 ± 8.1, <i>P</i> = .04), and both differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). There was no significant difference in PI (49.8 ± 8.7 vs 46.5 ± 6.9, <i>P</i> = .06). There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients who reported FORI by age, sex, or BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FORI affected nearly two-thirds of patients and was linked to clinically meaningful functional deficits. Although PROMIS scores reached population means overall, addressing psychological barriers may further optimize outcomes after augmented Broström repair.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective case series study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 3","pages":"24730114251363915"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear of Reinjury Limits Patient Functional Outcomes as Measured by PROMIS Following Augmented Broström Procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Steven M Hadley, Rachel Bergman, Sarah J Westvold, Tanya Kukreja, Carolyn J Hu, Ryan Filler, Muhammad Y Mutawakkil, Milap Patel, Anish R Kadakia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24730114251363915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of reinjury (FORI) can hinder recovery in several orthopaedic conditions, but its impact after augmented Broström repair is unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence of FORI and its association with functional outcomes in this setting. This study aims to determine whether patients experience FORI following augmented Broström repair and whether FORI impacts functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>80 patients who underwent Broström repair with <i>Internal</i>Brace augmentation were contacted to complete surveys containing questionnaires with Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI), Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), and whether patients experienced current (at time of survey completion) activity limitations due to FORI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>64% (51/80) of patients reported postoperative FORI. Average follow-up was 3.9 years. Fear was associated with worse PF (49.9 ± 7.4 vs 54.9 ± 8.4, <i>P</i> = .01) and worse CAIT (19.1 ± 8.0 vs 23.2 ± 8.1, <i>P</i> = .04), and both differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). There was no significant difference in PI (49.8 ± 8.7 vs 46.5 ± 6.9, <i>P</i> = .06). There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients who reported FORI by age, sex, or BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FORI affected nearly two-thirds of patients and was linked to clinically meaningful functional deficits. Although PROMIS scores reached population means overall, addressing psychological barriers may further optimize outcomes after augmented Broström repair.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective case series study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"24730114251363915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114251363915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114251363915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对再损伤的恐惧(FORI)会阻碍几种骨科疾病的恢复,但其在增强Broström修复后的影响尚不清楚。我们试图确定在这种情况下FORI的患病率及其与功能结局的关系。本研究旨在确定患者在Broström增强修复后是否会经历FORI,以及FORI是否会影响功能预后。方法:联系80例接受Broström内支架修复术的患者完成调查,包括使用患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)测量身体功能(PF)和疼痛干扰(PI), Cumberland踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)的问卷,以及患者是否因FORI而经历当前(调查完成时)活动限制。结果:64%(51/80)的患者报告了术后FORI。平均随访时间为3.9年。恐惧与PF恶化相关(49.9±7.4 vs 54.9±8.4,P =。01)和糟CAIT(19.1±8.0 vs 23.2±8.1,P =。04),两种差异均超过最小临床重要差异(MCID)。两组PI(49.8±8.7 vs 46.5±6.9,P = 0.06)差异无统计学意义。报告FORI的患者比例在年龄、性别或BMI方面没有显著差异。结论:FORI影响了近三分之二的患者,并与临床有意义的功能缺陷有关。虽然PROMIS得分总体上达到了人口水平,但解决心理障碍可能会进一步优化Broström修复后的结果。证据等级:四级,回顾性病例系列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fear of Reinjury Limits Patient Functional Outcomes as Measured by PROMIS Following Augmented Broström Procedure.

Fear of Reinjury Limits Patient Functional Outcomes as Measured by PROMIS Following Augmented Broström Procedure.

Fear of Reinjury Limits Patient Functional Outcomes as Measured by PROMIS Following Augmented Broström Procedure.

Fear of Reinjury Limits Patient Functional Outcomes as Measured by PROMIS Following Augmented Broström Procedure.

Background: Fear of reinjury (FORI) can hinder recovery in several orthopaedic conditions, but its impact after augmented Broström repair is unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence of FORI and its association with functional outcomes in this setting. This study aims to determine whether patients experience FORI following augmented Broström repair and whether FORI impacts functional outcomes.

Methods: 80 patients who underwent Broström repair with InternalBrace augmentation were contacted to complete surveys containing questionnaires with Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI), Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), and whether patients experienced current (at time of survey completion) activity limitations due to FORI.

Results: 64% (51/80) of patients reported postoperative FORI. Average follow-up was 3.9 years. Fear was associated with worse PF (49.9 ± 7.4 vs 54.9 ± 8.4, P = .01) and worse CAIT (19.1 ± 8.0 vs 23.2 ± 8.1, P = .04), and both differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). There was no significant difference in PI (49.8 ± 8.7 vs 46.5 ± 6.9, P = .06). There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients who reported FORI by age, sex, or BMI.

Conclusion: FORI affected nearly two-thirds of patients and was linked to clinically meaningful functional deficits. Although PROMIS scores reached population means overall, addressing psychological barriers may further optimize outcomes after augmented Broström repair.

Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信