五指捏捏任务的神经肌肉控制受训练历史的影响。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Dylan J Carter, James R Forsyth, Joshua P M Mattock, Jonathan Shemmell
{"title":"五指捏捏任务的神经肌肉控制受训练历史的影响。","authors":"Dylan J Carter, James R Forsyth, Joshua P M Mattock, Jonathan Shemmell","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07147-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hand control for dexterous and strength-based tasks involves several levels of the neuromuscular system which interact to produce force. We investigated hand force, motor unit (MU) control, and intermuscular coherence in specialist-trained groups to identify how training may affect neuromuscular force control and motor neuron activity. Equal groups of ten strength-trained (rock climbers) and dexterity-trained (musicians) individuals participated. Measures of forearm muscle structure were recorded and used to normalize maximal five-finger pinch force. Several submaximal trapezoidal pinch contractions were performed while force and electromyography (EMG) were recorded, and force steadiness was calculated. Motor unit firing rates were calculated from spike trains identified by surface EMG decomposition. Intermuscular coherence was calculated between two muscles controlling the hand (the abductor pollicis brevis and flexor digitorum superificialis), providing an estimate of the common synaptic inputs to these simultaneously activated muscles. Strength-trained participants had a higher force capacity (even when normalized to muscle size) and were steadier at controlling forces. The dexterity-trained group had faster MU discharge rates in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle at moderate force levels. Measures of synaptic inputs to the motor neuron pools were inconsistent. However, the largest peaks in the beta-band were at the lowest measured force level for the dexterity-trained group, while at the highest force intensity for the strength-trained group. These findings may indicate that the neuromuscular control of hand force differs between groups with different training histories.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 10","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular control of a five-finger pinch task is influenced by training history.\",\"authors\":\"Dylan J Carter, James R Forsyth, Joshua P M Mattock, Jonathan Shemmell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-025-07147-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hand control for dexterous and strength-based tasks involves several levels of the neuromuscular system which interact to produce force. We investigated hand force, motor unit (MU) control, and intermuscular coherence in specialist-trained groups to identify how training may affect neuromuscular force control and motor neuron activity. Equal groups of ten strength-trained (rock climbers) and dexterity-trained (musicians) individuals participated. Measures of forearm muscle structure were recorded and used to normalize maximal five-finger pinch force. Several submaximal trapezoidal pinch contractions were performed while force and electromyography (EMG) were recorded, and force steadiness was calculated. Motor unit firing rates were calculated from spike trains identified by surface EMG decomposition. Intermuscular coherence was calculated between two muscles controlling the hand (the abductor pollicis brevis and flexor digitorum superificialis), providing an estimate of the common synaptic inputs to these simultaneously activated muscles. Strength-trained participants had a higher force capacity (even when normalized to muscle size) and were steadier at controlling forces. The dexterity-trained group had faster MU discharge rates in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle at moderate force levels. Measures of synaptic inputs to the motor neuron pools were inconsistent. However, the largest peaks in the beta-band were at the lowest measured force level for the dexterity-trained group, while at the highest force intensity for the strength-trained group. These findings may indicate that the neuromuscular control of hand force differs between groups with different training histories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"243 10\",\"pages\":\"205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07147-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07147-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于灵巧和力量为基础的任务,手控制涉及到神经肌肉系统的几个层次,它们相互作用产生力量。我们调查了专家训练组的手部力量、运动单元(MU)控制和肌肉间一致性,以确定训练如何影响神经肌肉力量控制和运动神经元活动。每10人一组进行力量训练(攀岩者),另一组进行灵巧训练(音乐家)。记录前臂肌肉结构的测量,并用于标准化最大五指捏力。进行几次次最大的梯形捏缩,同时记录肌力和肌电图(EMG),计算力稳定性。通过表面肌电分解确定的脉冲序列计算运动单元的放电率。计算了控制手的两块肌肉(拇短外展肌和指浅屈肌)之间的肌间一致性,提供了对这些同时激活的肌肉的共同突触输入的估计。力量训练的参与者有更高的力量容量(即使按肌肉尺寸标准化),并且在控制力量方面更稳定。灵巧训练组在中等力度下拇外展短肌的MU放电速率更快。对运动神经元池的突触输入的测量是不一致的。然而,β -波段的最大峰值出现在灵巧训练组的最低测力水平,而力量训练组的最高测力强度。这些发现可能表明,不同训练历史的组对手部力量的神经肌肉控制是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neuromuscular control of a five-finger pinch task is influenced by training history.

Neuromuscular control of a five-finger pinch task is influenced by training history.

Neuromuscular control of a five-finger pinch task is influenced by training history.

Neuromuscular control of a five-finger pinch task is influenced by training history.

Hand control for dexterous and strength-based tasks involves several levels of the neuromuscular system which interact to produce force. We investigated hand force, motor unit (MU) control, and intermuscular coherence in specialist-trained groups to identify how training may affect neuromuscular force control and motor neuron activity. Equal groups of ten strength-trained (rock climbers) and dexterity-trained (musicians) individuals participated. Measures of forearm muscle structure were recorded and used to normalize maximal five-finger pinch force. Several submaximal trapezoidal pinch contractions were performed while force and electromyography (EMG) were recorded, and force steadiness was calculated. Motor unit firing rates were calculated from spike trains identified by surface EMG decomposition. Intermuscular coherence was calculated between two muscles controlling the hand (the abductor pollicis brevis and flexor digitorum superificialis), providing an estimate of the common synaptic inputs to these simultaneously activated muscles. Strength-trained participants had a higher force capacity (even when normalized to muscle size) and were steadier at controlling forces. The dexterity-trained group had faster MU discharge rates in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle at moderate force levels. Measures of synaptic inputs to the motor neuron pools were inconsistent. However, the largest peaks in the beta-band were at the lowest measured force level for the dexterity-trained group, while at the highest force intensity for the strength-trained group. These findings may indicate that the neuromuscular control of hand force differs between groups with different training histories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信