Galia Shaham, Irina Galperin, Amit Salomon, Eran Gazit, Aron S Buchman, Nir Giladi, James K Richardson, Jeffrey M Hausdorff
{"title":"步态起始的运动规划阶段:衰老、帕金森病的影响以及与认知功能的关联。","authors":"Galia Shaham, Irina Galperin, Amit Salomon, Eran Gazit, Aron S Buchman, Nir Giladi, James K Richardson, Jeffrey M Hausdorff","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07151-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The response to a request to walk involves a motor planning phase followed by an execution phase. The initial phase of gait initiation, specifically the time to anticipatory postural adjustment (APA), can be viewed as a form of reaction time. However, it is not clear how to characterize the cognitive processes involved in this stage. To address this question, time-to-APA, simple and complex upper limb visuomotor reaction time (SRT, CRT), cognitive, and motor performance were evaluated in 27 people with Parkinson's disease (PD), 31 older adults (OA), and 34 young adults (YA). Our results showed that time-to-APA was significantly longer than SRT in all three groups (p < 0.001), indicating a more complex cognitive process. In YA, time-to-APA was significantly shorter than CRT (p < 0.001). In the OA and PD, time-to-APA was not significantly different from CRT. Mixed-effects analysis showed significant time (p < 0.001), group (p = 0.037), and group × time interaction effects (p = 0.002). Among all subjects, time-to-APA, but not APA duration, was associated with the Color-Trails Test (part B: r<sub>s</sub> = 0.406, p < 0.001). In PD, APA duration was correlated with MDS-UPDRS-part 3 (motor) scores (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.535, p = 0.004), but time-to-APA was not (p = 0.892). These findings suggest that time-to-APA is a cognitive process that is more complex than an SRT task and shares properties of a CRT task, especially among older adults and people with PD. In PD, this initial movement planning stage is not related to motor impairment, in contrast to APA duration. Further research is necessary to identify the factors underlying this initial stage of gait initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 9","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motor planning stage of gait initiation: effects of aging, Parkinson's disease, and associations with cognitive function.\",\"authors\":\"Galia Shaham, Irina Galperin, Amit Salomon, Eran Gazit, Aron S Buchman, Nir Giladi, James K Richardson, Jeffrey M Hausdorff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-025-07151-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The response to a request to walk involves a motor planning phase followed by an execution phase. The initial phase of gait initiation, specifically the time to anticipatory postural adjustment (APA), can be viewed as a form of reaction time. However, it is not clear how to characterize the cognitive processes involved in this stage. To address this question, time-to-APA, simple and complex upper limb visuomotor reaction time (SRT, CRT), cognitive, and motor performance were evaluated in 27 people with Parkinson's disease (PD), 31 older adults (OA), and 34 young adults (YA). Our results showed that time-to-APA was significantly longer than SRT in all three groups (p < 0.001), indicating a more complex cognitive process. In YA, time-to-APA was significantly shorter than CRT (p < 0.001). In the OA and PD, time-to-APA was not significantly different from CRT. Mixed-effects analysis showed significant time (p < 0.001), group (p = 0.037), and group × time interaction effects (p = 0.002). Among all subjects, time-to-APA, but not APA duration, was associated with the Color-Trails Test (part B: r<sub>s</sub> = 0.406, p < 0.001). In PD, APA duration was correlated with MDS-UPDRS-part 3 (motor) scores (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.535, p = 0.004), but time-to-APA was not (p = 0.892). These findings suggest that time-to-APA is a cognitive process that is more complex than an SRT task and shares properties of a CRT task, especially among older adults and people with PD. In PD, this initial movement planning stage is not related to motor impairment, in contrast to APA duration. Further research is necessary to identify the factors underlying this initial stage of gait initiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"243 9\",\"pages\":\"201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394281/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07151-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07151-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对行走请求的响应包括运动计划阶段,随后是执行阶段。步态开始的初始阶段,特别是预期姿势调整(APA)的时间,可以被视为反应时间的一种形式。然而,目前尚不清楚如何描述这一阶段所涉及的认知过程。为了解决这个问题,我们评估了27名帕金森病患者(PD)、31名老年人(OA)和34名年轻人(YA)的apa时间、简单和复杂上肢视觉运动反应时间(SRT, CRT)、认知和运动表现。我们的结果显示,三组患者到apa的时间均显著长于SRT (p s = 0.406, ps = 0.535, p = 0.004),但到apa的时间无显著差异(p = 0.892)。这些发现表明,到apa的时间是一个比SRT任务更复杂的认知过程,并且具有CRT任务的特性,特别是在老年人和PD患者中。在PD中,与APA持续时间相比,这一初始运动计划阶段与运动障碍无关。进一步的研究是必要的,以确定潜在的这个初始阶段的步态启动的因素。
Motor planning stage of gait initiation: effects of aging, Parkinson's disease, and associations with cognitive function.
The response to a request to walk involves a motor planning phase followed by an execution phase. The initial phase of gait initiation, specifically the time to anticipatory postural adjustment (APA), can be viewed as a form of reaction time. However, it is not clear how to characterize the cognitive processes involved in this stage. To address this question, time-to-APA, simple and complex upper limb visuomotor reaction time (SRT, CRT), cognitive, and motor performance were evaluated in 27 people with Parkinson's disease (PD), 31 older adults (OA), and 34 young adults (YA). Our results showed that time-to-APA was significantly longer than SRT in all three groups (p < 0.001), indicating a more complex cognitive process. In YA, time-to-APA was significantly shorter than CRT (p < 0.001). In the OA and PD, time-to-APA was not significantly different from CRT. Mixed-effects analysis showed significant time (p < 0.001), group (p = 0.037), and group × time interaction effects (p = 0.002). Among all subjects, time-to-APA, but not APA duration, was associated with the Color-Trails Test (part B: rs = 0.406, p < 0.001). In PD, APA duration was correlated with MDS-UPDRS-part 3 (motor) scores (rs = 0.535, p = 0.004), but time-to-APA was not (p = 0.892). These findings suggest that time-to-APA is a cognitive process that is more complex than an SRT task and shares properties of a CRT task, especially among older adults and people with PD. In PD, this initial movement planning stage is not related to motor impairment, in contrast to APA duration. Further research is necessary to identify the factors underlying this initial stage of gait initiation.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.