{"title":"局部晚期胃癌患者RAD51表达与新辅助治疗反应及预后的关系","authors":"Serhat Sekmek, Serhat Ozan, Fahriye Tugba Kos, Hayriye Tatli Dogan, Mehmet Akif Parlar, Didem Sener Dede","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2555468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to investigate the effect of RAD51 expression on pathological response and survival in gastric cancer patients receiving fluorouracil plus leucovorin, cisplatin and docataxel (FLOT) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>RAD51 immunohistochemistry staining was performed in the endoscopy biopsies of the patients, and the pathological responses in the surgery of the patients after NACT were evaluated using the Ryan tumor regression score (RTRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>89 patients participated in this study. The factors affecting the pathological responses of the patients after NACT were examined, patients with high RAD51 nuclear expression percentage (NEP) responded better to NACT (<i>p</i> = 0.020). RAD51 nuclear expression density (NED) (<i>p</i> = 0.127), age (<i>p</i> = 0.999), sex (<i>p</i> = 0.098), clinical stage (<i>p</i> = 0.540), tumor pathology (<i>p</i> = 0.999) did not affect the pathological response after NACT. Age, gender, clinical stage, tumor pathology, RAD51 NEP or RAD51 NED did not affect DFS or OS. Patients with low RTRS had better DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.009) results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a result of our study, it was observed that patients with high RAD51 NEP had better pathological responses after NACT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of RAD51 expression with response to neoadjuvant treatment and prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Serhat Sekmek, Serhat Ozan, Fahriye Tugba Kos, Hayriye Tatli Dogan, Mehmet Akif Parlar, Didem Sener Dede\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2555468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to investigate the effect of RAD51 expression on pathological response and survival in gastric cancer patients receiving fluorouracil plus leucovorin, cisplatin and docataxel (FLOT) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>RAD51 immunohistochemistry staining was performed in the endoscopy biopsies of the patients, and the pathological responses in the surgery of the patients after NACT were evaluated using the Ryan tumor regression score (RTRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>89 patients participated in this study. The factors affecting the pathological responses of the patients after NACT were examined, patients with high RAD51 nuclear expression percentage (NEP) responded better to NACT (<i>p</i> = 0.020). RAD51 nuclear expression density (NED) (<i>p</i> = 0.127), age (<i>p</i> = 0.999), sex (<i>p</i> = 0.098), clinical stage (<i>p</i> = 0.540), tumor pathology (<i>p</i> = 0.999) did not affect the pathological response after NACT. Age, gender, clinical stage, tumor pathology, RAD51 NEP or RAD51 NED did not affect DFS or OS. Patients with low RTRS had better DFS (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and OS (<i>p</i> = 0.009) results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a result of our study, it was observed that patients with high RAD51 NEP had better pathological responses after NACT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2555468\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2555468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of RAD51 expression with response to neoadjuvant treatment and prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer.
Background: We aimed to investigate the effect of RAD51 expression on pathological response and survival in gastric cancer patients receiving fluorouracil plus leucovorin, cisplatin and docataxel (FLOT) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
Research design and methods: RAD51 immunohistochemistry staining was performed in the endoscopy biopsies of the patients, and the pathological responses in the surgery of the patients after NACT were evaluated using the Ryan tumor regression score (RTRS).
Results: 89 patients participated in this study. The factors affecting the pathological responses of the patients after NACT were examined, patients with high RAD51 nuclear expression percentage (NEP) responded better to NACT (p = 0.020). RAD51 nuclear expression density (NED) (p = 0.127), age (p = 0.999), sex (p = 0.098), clinical stage (p = 0.540), tumor pathology (p = 0.999) did not affect the pathological response after NACT. Age, gender, clinical stage, tumor pathology, RAD51 NEP or RAD51 NED did not affect DFS or OS. Patients with low RTRS had better DFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.009) results.
Conclusions: As a result of our study, it was observed that patients with high RAD51 NEP had better pathological responses after NACT.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.