在生活在冲突地区的儿童中,同理心的脆弱作用。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Eliya Kab, Shir Porat-Butman, Moriya Rachmani, Einat Levy-Gigi
{"title":"在生活在冲突地区的儿童中,同理心的脆弱作用。","authors":"Eliya Kab, Shir Porat-Butman, Moriya Rachmani, Einat Levy-Gigi","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2527548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Children in conflict zones face repeated and cumulative trauma exposure, increasing their risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite the critical role of empathy in coping with trauma, research on how children's cognitive and affective empathy relates to their psychological adjustment remains limited. Adult studies suggest that cognitive empathy may support better coping, whereas affective empathy could increase vulnerability to PTSD symptoms. However, it remains unclear whether this differential pattern holds in children and how it interacts with levels of trauma exposure. This study investigated the moderating role of cognitive and affective empathy in the relationship between cumulative trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms in children.<b>Method:</b> Sixty-two children (Mean age = 9.64, SD = 1.15) from regions with varying proximity to conflict zones completed self-report questionnaires to evaluate cumulative trauma exposure, empathy, and anxiety, and were interviewed to assess PTSD symptoms.<b>Results:</b> While cognitive empathy moderated the relationship between cumulative trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms, it did not serve as a protective factor as hypothesised. Specifically, children with low cognitive empathy demonstrated a positive relationship between trauma exposure and PTSD symptom severity, whereas those with high cognitive empathy exhibited consistently high PTSD symptoms, regardless of exposure level. Affective empathy did not moderate this relationship but was positively associated with PTSD.<b>Conclusions:</b> High cognitive and affective empathy emerged as vulnerability factors for PTSD, potentially due to developmental challenges in its adaptive use during childhood. These findings question the traditional view of cognitive empathy as universally protective, highlighting the need to monitor its role throughout development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2527548"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The vulnerable role of empathy in children who live in conflict zones.\",\"authors\":\"Eliya Kab, Shir Porat-Butman, Moriya Rachmani, Einat Levy-Gigi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2527548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Children in conflict zones face repeated and cumulative trauma exposure, increasing their risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite the critical role of empathy in coping with trauma, research on how children's cognitive and affective empathy relates to their psychological adjustment remains limited. Adult studies suggest that cognitive empathy may support better coping, whereas affective empathy could increase vulnerability to PTSD symptoms. However, it remains unclear whether this differential pattern holds in children and how it interacts with levels of trauma exposure. This study investigated the moderating role of cognitive and affective empathy in the relationship between cumulative trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms in children.<b>Method:</b> Sixty-two children (Mean age = 9.64, SD = 1.15) from regions with varying proximity to conflict zones completed self-report questionnaires to evaluate cumulative trauma exposure, empathy, and anxiety, and were interviewed to assess PTSD symptoms.<b>Results:</b> While cognitive empathy moderated the relationship between cumulative trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms, it did not serve as a protective factor as hypothesised. Specifically, children with low cognitive empathy demonstrated a positive relationship between trauma exposure and PTSD symptom severity, whereas those with high cognitive empathy exhibited consistently high PTSD symptoms, regardless of exposure level. Affective empathy did not moderate this relationship but was positively associated with PTSD.<b>Conclusions:</b> High cognitive and affective empathy emerged as vulnerability factors for PTSD, potentially due to developmental challenges in its adaptive use during childhood. These findings question the traditional view of cognitive empathy as universally protective, highlighting the need to monitor its role throughout development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2527548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409857/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2527548\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2527548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:冲突地区的儿童面临着反复和累积的创伤暴露,增加了他们患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险。尽管共情在创伤应对中起着至关重要的作用,但关于儿童认知共情和情感共情与心理适应之间关系的研究仍然有限。成人研究表明,认知共情可能支持更好的应对,而情感共情可能增加对创伤后应激障碍症状的脆弱性。然而,目前尚不清楚这种差异模式是否适用于儿童,以及它如何与创伤暴露水平相互作用。本研究探讨了认知共情和情感共情在儿童累积创伤暴露与PTSD症状之间的调节作用。方法:来自不同冲突地区的62名儿童(平均年龄= 9.64,SD = 1.15)完成了自我报告问卷,评估累积创伤暴露、共情和焦虑,并进行了创伤后应激障碍症状的评估。结果:虽然认知共情调节了累积创伤暴露与PTSD症状之间的关系,但它并不像假设的那样是一种保护因素。具体而言,低认知共情的儿童在创伤暴露与PTSD症状严重程度之间表现出正相关关系,而高认知共情的儿童无论暴露水平如何,都表现出一贯的高PTSD症状。情感共情没有调节这种关系,但与创伤后应激障碍呈正相关。结论:高认知和情感共情是创伤后应激障碍的易感因素,可能是由于儿童时期适应性使用的发育挑战。这些发现质疑了认知共情具有普遍保护作用的传统观点,强调了在整个发展过程中监测其作用的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The vulnerable role of empathy in children who live in conflict zones.

The vulnerable role of empathy in children who live in conflict zones.

The vulnerable role of empathy in children who live in conflict zones.

Objective: Children in conflict zones face repeated and cumulative trauma exposure, increasing their risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite the critical role of empathy in coping with trauma, research on how children's cognitive and affective empathy relates to their psychological adjustment remains limited. Adult studies suggest that cognitive empathy may support better coping, whereas affective empathy could increase vulnerability to PTSD symptoms. However, it remains unclear whether this differential pattern holds in children and how it interacts with levels of trauma exposure. This study investigated the moderating role of cognitive and affective empathy in the relationship between cumulative trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms in children.Method: Sixty-two children (Mean age = 9.64, SD = 1.15) from regions with varying proximity to conflict zones completed self-report questionnaires to evaluate cumulative trauma exposure, empathy, and anxiety, and were interviewed to assess PTSD symptoms.Results: While cognitive empathy moderated the relationship between cumulative trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms, it did not serve as a protective factor as hypothesised. Specifically, children with low cognitive empathy demonstrated a positive relationship between trauma exposure and PTSD symptom severity, whereas those with high cognitive empathy exhibited consistently high PTSD symptoms, regardless of exposure level. Affective empathy did not moderate this relationship but was positively associated with PTSD.Conclusions: High cognitive and affective empathy emerged as vulnerability factors for PTSD, potentially due to developmental challenges in its adaptive use during childhood. These findings question the traditional view of cognitive empathy as universally protective, highlighting the need to monitor its role throughout development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信