使用加拿大心血管学会分级的st段抬高型心肌梗死心肌组织损伤分期的相关性和预后意义

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ivan Lechner, Jaclyn Carberry, Thomas Stiermaier, Christina Tiller, Magdalena Holzknecht, Fritz Oberhollenzer, Alex Kaser, Johannes Mair, Agnes Mayr, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, David Carrick, Clemens Dlaska, Axel Bauer, Holger Thiele, Ingo Eitel, Bernhard Metzler, Colin Berry, Martin Reindl, Sebastian J Reinstadler
{"title":"使用加拿大心血管学会分级的st段抬高型心肌梗死心肌组织损伤分期的相关性和预后意义","authors":"Ivan Lechner, Jaclyn Carberry, Thomas Stiermaier, Christina Tiller, Magdalena Holzknecht, Fritz Oberhollenzer, Alex Kaser, Johannes Mair, Agnes Mayr, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, David Carrick, Clemens Dlaska, Axel Bauer, Holger Thiele, Ingo Eitel, Bernhard Metzler, Colin Berry, Martin Reindl, Sebastian J Reinstadler","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The recently proposed Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification categorizes post-infarction tissue injury into four stages, potentially improving risk stratification and guiding cardioprotective strategies. Its clinical and prognostic relevance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. We aimed to compare clinical characteristics across CCS stages and validate their prognostic implications in STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analysed 1,109 STEMI patients included in three prospective studies. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed 3 (interquartile range 2-5) days after MI and patients were classified as follows: stage 1 (aborted MI), stage 2 (MI with necrosis and absence of microvascular injury), stage 3 (MI with necrosis and microvascular obstruction) and stage 4 (MI with necrosis and intramyocardial haemorrhage).This analysis revealed distinct patterns of clinical presentation, biomarker profiles and cardiac function at different CCS stages. There were differences in adverse clinical event rates and mortality between CCS stages (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]: 0.7%, 3.4%, 3.1%, 15.7%, p<0.001 and mortality: 0.7%, 1.7%, 0.9%, 6.3%, p<0.001). The CCS stage had a moderate to good predictive value for MACE and mortality (AUC 0.74 [95% CI: 0.68-0.80], p<0.001 and AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.61-0.80], p<0.001) at 12 months, respectively. CCS stages were independently associated with MACE in multivariable Cox regression (HR: 2.18 [95% CI, 1.70-2.78], p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes clinical characteristics across CCS stages and provides insights into their prognostic implications in a large cohort of STEMI patients reperfused by PCI. These data should inform the use of CCS stages in future trial designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations and Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Tissue Injury Stages in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Lechner, Jaclyn Carberry, Thomas Stiermaier, Christina Tiller, Magdalena Holzknecht, Fritz Oberhollenzer, Alex Kaser, Johannes Mair, Agnes Mayr, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, David Carrick, Clemens Dlaska, Axel Bauer, Holger Thiele, Ingo Eitel, Bernhard Metzler, Colin Berry, Martin Reindl, Sebastian J Reinstadler\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The recently proposed Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification categorizes post-infarction tissue injury into four stages, potentially improving risk stratification and guiding cardioprotective strategies. Its clinical and prognostic relevance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. We aimed to compare clinical characteristics across CCS stages and validate their prognostic implications in STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analysed 1,109 STEMI patients included in three prospective studies. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed 3 (interquartile range 2-5) days after MI and patients were classified as follows: stage 1 (aborted MI), stage 2 (MI with necrosis and absence of microvascular injury), stage 3 (MI with necrosis and microvascular obstruction) and stage 4 (MI with necrosis and intramyocardial haemorrhage).This analysis revealed distinct patterns of clinical presentation, biomarker profiles and cardiac function at different CCS stages. There were differences in adverse clinical event rates and mortality between CCS stages (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]: 0.7%, 3.4%, 3.1%, 15.7%, p<0.001 and mortality: 0.7%, 1.7%, 0.9%, 6.3%, p<0.001). The CCS stage had a moderate to good predictive value for MACE and mortality (AUC 0.74 [95% CI: 0.68-0.80], p<0.001 and AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.61-0.80], p<0.001) at 12 months, respectively. CCS stages were independently associated with MACE in multivariable Cox regression (HR: 2.18 [95% CI, 1.70-2.78], p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes clinical characteristics across CCS stages and provides insights into their prognostic implications in a large cohort of STEMI patients reperfused by PCI. These data should inform the use of CCS stages in future trial designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf250\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近提出的加拿大心血管学会(CCS)分类将梗死后组织损伤分为四个阶段,可能改善风险分层和指导心脏保护策略。其在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中的临床和预后相关性尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较不同CCS分期的临床特征,并验证其对STEMI的预后影响。方法和结果:我们分析了3项前瞻性研究中的1109例STEMI患者。心肌梗死后3天(四分位数范围2-5)进行心脏磁共振(CMR)成像,将患者分为:1期(心肌梗死流产)、2期(心肌梗死伴坏死、无微血管损伤)、3期(心肌梗死伴坏死、微血管阻塞)和4期(心肌梗死伴坏死、心内出血)。该分析揭示了不同CCS阶段的临床表现、生物标志物特征和心功能的不同模式。不同CCS分期的不良临床事件发生率和死亡率存在差异(主要心血管不良事件[MACE]: 0.7%, 3.4%, 3.1%, 15.7%)。结论:本研究描述了CCS分期的临床特征,并为PCI再灌注STEMI患者的大队列预后提供了见解。这些数据应该为未来试验设计中CCS阶段的使用提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations and Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Tissue Injury Stages in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification.

Aims: The recently proposed Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification categorizes post-infarction tissue injury into four stages, potentially improving risk stratification and guiding cardioprotective strategies. Its clinical and prognostic relevance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. We aimed to compare clinical characteristics across CCS stages and validate their prognostic implications in STEMI.

Methods and results: We analysed 1,109 STEMI patients included in three prospective studies. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed 3 (interquartile range 2-5) days after MI and patients were classified as follows: stage 1 (aborted MI), stage 2 (MI with necrosis and absence of microvascular injury), stage 3 (MI with necrosis and microvascular obstruction) and stage 4 (MI with necrosis and intramyocardial haemorrhage).This analysis revealed distinct patterns of clinical presentation, biomarker profiles and cardiac function at different CCS stages. There were differences in adverse clinical event rates and mortality between CCS stages (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]: 0.7%, 3.4%, 3.1%, 15.7%, p<0.001 and mortality: 0.7%, 1.7%, 0.9%, 6.3%, p<0.001). The CCS stage had a moderate to good predictive value for MACE and mortality (AUC 0.74 [95% CI: 0.68-0.80], p<0.001 and AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.61-0.80], p<0.001) at 12 months, respectively. CCS stages were independently associated with MACE in multivariable Cox regression (HR: 2.18 [95% CI, 1.70-2.78], p<0.001).

Conclusion: This study describes clinical characteristics across CCS stages and provides insights into their prognostic implications in a large cohort of STEMI patients reperfused by PCI. These data should inform the use of CCS stages in future trial designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信