Anna B C Humphreys, Bertil Lindahl, Anita Berglund, Vanessa Voelskow, Si Fang, Ole Fröbert, Robin Hofmann, Tomas Jernberg, Miguel A Hernán, Anthony A Matthews
{"title":"ACE抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对左室射血分数保存的心肌梗死的长期疗效。","authors":"Anna B C Humphreys, Bertil Lindahl, Anita Berglund, Vanessa Voelskow, Si Fang, Ole Fröbert, Robin Hofmann, Tomas Jernberg, Miguel A Hernán, Anthony A Matthews","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in the long-term treatment of myocardial infarction with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, it is unknown whether there is a benefit in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF (≥50%).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We used Swedish healthcare registries to emulate a target trial of ACEi/ARBs vs. no ACEi/ARBs for the prevention of a composite outcome (death, myocardial infarction, or heart failure) and its individual components among individuals under 75 years with myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥ 50% between September 2010 and June 2021. We estimated observational analogues of the intention-to-treat effect and the per-protocol effect with confounding adjustment via inverse probability weighting. The 10 697 individuals in the ACEi/ARB group were on average older (median 61 vs. 60 years) and more likely to be male (80.2% vs. 75.3% male) than the 4730 individuals in the no ACEi/ARB group. The estimated 5-year risk of the composite outcome was 7.8% (95% confidence interval 7.1%, 8.5%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 8.1% (7.0%, 9.3%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.3% (-1.6%, 1.0%). After adjustment for adherence, the risk of the composite outcome was 6.5% (5.9%, 7.2%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 6.7% (5.6%, 8.1%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.2% (-1.7%, 1.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The estimated risk of a composite of death, myocardial infarction or heart failure was similar in recipients and non-recipients of ACEi/ARB. Our estimates suggest ACEi/ARB treatment in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF does not confer a benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effectiveness of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Anna B C Humphreys, Bertil Lindahl, Anita Berglund, Vanessa Voelskow, Si Fang, Ole Fröbert, Robin Hofmann, Tomas Jernberg, Miguel A Hernán, Anthony A Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in the long-term treatment of myocardial infarction with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, it is unknown whether there is a benefit in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF (≥50%).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We used Swedish healthcare registries to emulate a target trial of ACEi/ARBs vs. no ACEi/ARBs for the prevention of a composite outcome (death, myocardial infarction, or heart failure) and its individual components among individuals under 75 years with myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥ 50% between September 2010 and June 2021. We estimated observational analogues of the intention-to-treat effect and the per-protocol effect with confounding adjustment via inverse probability weighting. The 10 697 individuals in the ACEi/ARB group were on average older (median 61 vs. 60 years) and more likely to be male (80.2% vs. 75.3% male) than the 4730 individuals in the no ACEi/ARB group. The estimated 5-year risk of the composite outcome was 7.8% (95% confidence interval 7.1%, 8.5%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 8.1% (7.0%, 9.3%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.3% (-1.6%, 1.0%). After adjustment for adherence, the risk of the composite outcome was 6.5% (5.9%, 7.2%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 6.7% (5.6%, 8.1%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.2% (-1.7%, 1.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The estimated risk of a composite of death, myocardial infarction or heart failure was similar in recipients and non-recipients of ACEi/ARB. Our estimates suggest ACEi/ARB treatment in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF does not confer a benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf051\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)长期治疗左室射血分数(LVEF)降低的心肌梗死是有效的。然而,对于保留LVEF(≥50%)的心肌梗死患者是否有益处尚不清楚。方法和结果:在2010年9月至2021年6月期间,我们使用瑞典医疗保健登记处模拟ACEi/ARBs与无ACEi/ARBs的目标试验,以预防75岁以下心肌梗死且LVEF≥50%的个体的复合结局(死亡、心肌梗死或心力衰竭)及其个别成分。我们通过逆概率加权估计了意向治疗效应和按方案效应的观察性类似物,并进行了混杂校正。与没有ACEi/ARB组的4730名患者相比,ACEi/ARB组的10697名患者平均年龄更大(中位61岁vs. 60岁),男性患者的比例更高(80.2% vs. 75.3%)。ACEi/ARB组复合结局的5年估计风险为7.8%(95%可信区间7.1%,8.5%),无ACEi/ARB组为8.1% (7.0%,9.3%);风险差-0.3%(-1.6%,1.0%)。调整依从性后,ACEi/ARB组的综合结局风险为6.5%(5.9%,7.2%),无ACEi/ARB组为6.7% (5.6%,8.1%);风险差-0.2%(-1.7%,1.0%)。结论:ACEi/ARB接受者和非接受者的死亡、心肌梗死或心力衰竭综合风险估计相似。我们的估计表明,ACEi/ARB治疗保留LVEF的心肌梗死并不会带来益处。
Long-term effectiveness of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are effective in the long-term treatment of myocardial infarction with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, it is unknown whether there is a benefit in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF (≥50%).
Methods and results: We used Swedish healthcare registries to emulate a target trial of ACEi/ARBs vs. no ACEi/ARBs for the prevention of a composite outcome (death, myocardial infarction, or heart failure) and its individual components among individuals under 75 years with myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥ 50% between September 2010 and June 2021. We estimated observational analogues of the intention-to-treat effect and the per-protocol effect with confounding adjustment via inverse probability weighting. The 10 697 individuals in the ACEi/ARB group were on average older (median 61 vs. 60 years) and more likely to be male (80.2% vs. 75.3% male) than the 4730 individuals in the no ACEi/ARB group. The estimated 5-year risk of the composite outcome was 7.8% (95% confidence interval 7.1%, 8.5%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 8.1% (7.0%, 9.3%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.3% (-1.6%, 1.0%). After adjustment for adherence, the risk of the composite outcome was 6.5% (5.9%, 7.2%) in the ACEi/ARB group and 6.7% (5.6%, 8.1%) in the no ACEi/ARB group; risk difference -0.2% (-1.7%, 1.0%).
Conclusion: The estimated risk of a composite of death, myocardial infarction or heart failure was similar in recipients and non-recipients of ACEi/ARB. Our estimates suggest ACEi/ARB treatment in myocardial infarction with preserved LVEF does not confer a benefit.
期刊介绍:
The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field.
While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.