Muhammad Anas Nayyer, Hamna Rasool, Hassan Murtaza, Muhammad Rehman Safdar, Suchna Meeral Khan, Salman Khalid, Mohammad Umer
{"title":"替戈拉赞与质子泵抑制剂治疗糜烂性食管炎:一个更好的选择还是另一个选择?随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammad Anas Nayyer, Hamna Rasool, Hassan Murtaza, Muhammad Rehman Safdar, Suchna Meeral Khan, Salman Khalid, Mohammad Umer","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has emerged as a potential alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis (EE), especially in light of long-term safety concerns associated with PPIs. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan compared to PPIs in patients with EE. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, including three randomized controlled trials with a total of 658 patients diagnosed with EE. The primary outcomes were cumulative endoscopic healing rates across 4-8 weeks and at 4 and 8 weeks, while secondary outcomes included any adverse events, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Tegoprazan demonstrated noninferior healing rates at 4 weeks [relative risk (RR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.16; P = 0.28; I² = 51%] and 8 weeks (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06; P = 0.73; I² = 0%) compared to PPIs. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse events or SAEs (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.92-1.53; P = 0.19; I² = 24%). However, a significantly higher rate of drug-related TEAEs was observed in the tegoprazan group (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48; P = 0.02; I² = 0%). In conclusion, tegoprazan is an effective treatment option for EE, with comparable efficacy to PPIs, though further studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term safety before routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tegoprazan vs. proton pump inhibitors for erosive esophagitis: a superior alternative or just another option? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Anas Nayyer, Hamna Rasool, Hassan Murtaza, Muhammad Rehman Safdar, Suchna Meeral Khan, Salman Khalid, Mohammad Umer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has emerged as a potential alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis (EE), especially in light of long-term safety concerns associated with PPIs. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan compared to PPIs in patients with EE. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, including three randomized controlled trials with a total of 658 patients diagnosed with EE. The primary outcomes were cumulative endoscopic healing rates across 4-8 weeks and at 4 and 8 weeks, while secondary outcomes included any adverse events, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Tegoprazan demonstrated noninferior healing rates at 4 weeks [relative risk (RR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.16; P = 0.28; I² = 51%] and 8 weeks (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06; P = 0.73; I² = 0%) compared to PPIs. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse events or SAEs (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.92-1.53; P = 0.19; I² = 24%). However, a significantly higher rate of drug-related TEAEs was observed in the tegoprazan group (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48; P = 0.02; I² = 0%). In conclusion, tegoprazan is an effective treatment option for EE, with comparable efficacy to PPIs, though further studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term safety before routine clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tegoprazan vs. proton pump inhibitors for erosive esophagitis: a superior alternative or just another option? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has emerged as a potential alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis (EE), especially in light of long-term safety concerns associated with PPIs. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan compared to PPIs in patients with EE. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, including three randomized controlled trials with a total of 658 patients diagnosed with EE. The primary outcomes were cumulative endoscopic healing rates across 4-8 weeks and at 4 and 8 weeks, while secondary outcomes included any adverse events, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Tegoprazan demonstrated noninferior healing rates at 4 weeks [relative risk (RR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.16; P = 0.28; I² = 51%] and 8 weeks (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06; P = 0.73; I² = 0%) compared to PPIs. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse events or SAEs (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.92-1.53; P = 0.19; I² = 24%). However, a significantly higher rate of drug-related TEAEs was observed in the tegoprazan group (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48; P = 0.02; I² = 0%). In conclusion, tegoprazan is an effective treatment option for EE, with comparable efficacy to PPIs, though further studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term safety before routine clinical use.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.