不同球后麻醉技术在马中的应用和经验的全球调查。

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Simona Lieberth, Katharina Thieme, Christian Dancker, Roswitha Merle, Johanna Corinna Eule
{"title":"不同球后麻醉技术在马中的应用和经验的全球调查。","authors":"Simona Lieberth, Katharina Thieme, Christian Dancker, Roswitha Merle, Johanna Corinna Eule","doi":"10.1111/evj.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrobulbar anaesthesia (RBA) is relevant for ocular surgery in standing sedated horses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gathering insights on experiences with RBA techniques.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey collected information on the respondents' professional background, indications, injection methods, use of ultrasound assistance, medication, and complications associated with RBA in horses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and thirty-eight veterinarians from 25 countries contributed. 86.1% were members of veterinary specialty colleges. RBA indications were enucleation (97.8%), corneal surgery (29.5%), eyelid surgery, paracentesis of the vitreous and anterior chamber, cataract surgery and vitrectomy (<10.0% each). The dorsal approach was most commonly used (88.8%), followed by the 4-point (34.8%), lateral (8.9%), and modified Peterson blocks (2.2%). Ultrasound-assisted needle positioning was used by 16.1%. Most commonly administered drugs were mepivacaine (67.4%), lidocaine (56.3%), and bupivacaine (37.9%). Complications included lack of anaesthesia (40.6%), exophthalmos (33.5%), chemosis (32.1%), and retrobulbar haemorrhage (22.8%). The choice of injection method and reported complications were significantly influenced by participants' professional backgrounds: as horse caseload percentage increased, dorsal injection use decreased (p = 0.011, OR 0.981, 95% CI 0.967-0.996), injection-related complications increased (p < 0.001, OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.006-1.024), and postoperative complications decreased (p < 0.001, OR 0.983, 95% CI 0.976-0.991). As ophthalmic case percentage increased, dorsal injection use increased (p = 0.009, OR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006-1.039), 4-point injection method decreased (p = 0.044, OR 0.993, 95% CI: 0.986-1.000), injection-related complications decreased (p < 0.001, OR 0.985, 95% CI 0.978-0.993), and postoperative complications increased (p < 0.001, OR 1.019, 95% CI 1.012-1.027).</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Results may reflect selection and recall bias; complication prevalence was not assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dorsal and 4-point blocks are the most used, varying by participants' professional background. RBA causes mostly mild complications; severe ones are rare.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global survey on the utilisation and experiences with different retrobulbar anaesthesia techniques in horses.\",\"authors\":\"Simona Lieberth, Katharina Thieme, Christian Dancker, Roswitha Merle, Johanna Corinna Eule\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/evj.70082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrobulbar anaesthesia (RBA) is relevant for ocular surgery in standing sedated horses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gathering insights on experiences with RBA techniques.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey collected information on the respondents' professional background, indications, injection methods, use of ultrasound assistance, medication, and complications associated with RBA in horses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and thirty-eight veterinarians from 25 countries contributed. 86.1% were members of veterinary specialty colleges. RBA indications were enucleation (97.8%), corneal surgery (29.5%), eyelid surgery, paracentesis of the vitreous and anterior chamber, cataract surgery and vitrectomy (<10.0% each). The dorsal approach was most commonly used (88.8%), followed by the 4-point (34.8%), lateral (8.9%), and modified Peterson blocks (2.2%). Ultrasound-assisted needle positioning was used by 16.1%. Most commonly administered drugs were mepivacaine (67.4%), lidocaine (56.3%), and bupivacaine (37.9%). Complications included lack of anaesthesia (40.6%), exophthalmos (33.5%), chemosis (32.1%), and retrobulbar haemorrhage (22.8%). The choice of injection method and reported complications were significantly influenced by participants' professional backgrounds: as horse caseload percentage increased, dorsal injection use decreased (p = 0.011, OR 0.981, 95% CI 0.967-0.996), injection-related complications increased (p < 0.001, OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.006-1.024), and postoperative complications decreased (p < 0.001, OR 0.983, 95% CI 0.976-0.991). As ophthalmic case percentage increased, dorsal injection use increased (p = 0.009, OR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006-1.039), 4-point injection method decreased (p = 0.044, OR 0.993, 95% CI: 0.986-1.000), injection-related complications decreased (p < 0.001, OR 0.985, 95% CI 0.978-0.993), and postoperative complications increased (p < 0.001, OR 1.019, 95% CI 1.012-1.027).</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Results may reflect selection and recall bias; complication prevalence was not assessed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dorsal and 4-point blocks are the most used, varying by participants' professional background. RBA causes mostly mild complications; severe ones are rare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equine Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equine Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:球后麻醉(RBA)与站立镇静马的眼部手术有关。目的:收集关于RBA技术经验的见解。研究设计:横断面调查。方法:通过在线调查收集调查对象的专业背景、适应症、注射方法、超声辅助的使用、药物以及与马RBA相关的并发症等信息。结果:来自25个国家的238名兽医参与了研究。兽医专业院校成员占86.1%;RBA的适应证包括眼球摘除术(97.8%)、角膜手术(29.5%)、眼睑手术、玻璃体前房穿刺术、白内障手术和玻璃体切除术(主要局限性:结果可能反映了选择和回忆偏倚;未评估并发症的发生率。结论:背侧和4点块是使用最多的,因参与者的专业背景而异。RBA主要引起轻微的并发症;严重的是罕见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global survey on the utilisation and experiences with different retrobulbar anaesthesia techniques in horses.

Background: Retrobulbar anaesthesia (RBA) is relevant for ocular surgery in standing sedated horses.

Objectives: Gathering insights on experiences with RBA techniques.

Study design: Cross-sectional survey.

Methods: An online survey collected information on the respondents' professional background, indications, injection methods, use of ultrasound assistance, medication, and complications associated with RBA in horses.

Results: Two-hundred and thirty-eight veterinarians from 25 countries contributed. 86.1% were members of veterinary specialty colleges. RBA indications were enucleation (97.8%), corneal surgery (29.5%), eyelid surgery, paracentesis of the vitreous and anterior chamber, cataract surgery and vitrectomy (<10.0% each). The dorsal approach was most commonly used (88.8%), followed by the 4-point (34.8%), lateral (8.9%), and modified Peterson blocks (2.2%). Ultrasound-assisted needle positioning was used by 16.1%. Most commonly administered drugs were mepivacaine (67.4%), lidocaine (56.3%), and bupivacaine (37.9%). Complications included lack of anaesthesia (40.6%), exophthalmos (33.5%), chemosis (32.1%), and retrobulbar haemorrhage (22.8%). The choice of injection method and reported complications were significantly influenced by participants' professional backgrounds: as horse caseload percentage increased, dorsal injection use decreased (p = 0.011, OR 0.981, 95% CI 0.967-0.996), injection-related complications increased (p < 0.001, OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.006-1.024), and postoperative complications decreased (p < 0.001, OR 0.983, 95% CI 0.976-0.991). As ophthalmic case percentage increased, dorsal injection use increased (p = 0.009, OR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006-1.039), 4-point injection method decreased (p = 0.044, OR 0.993, 95% CI: 0.986-1.000), injection-related complications decreased (p < 0.001, OR 0.985, 95% CI 0.978-0.993), and postoperative complications increased (p < 0.001, OR 1.019, 95% CI 1.012-1.027).

Main limitations: Results may reflect selection and recall bias; complication prevalence was not assessed.

Conclusions: Dorsal and 4-point blocks are the most used, varying by participants' professional background. RBA causes mostly mild complications; severe ones are rare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信