肩部手术中沙滩椅体位期间连续与间歇无创血压监测:一项随机对照试验。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alessandro Vergari, Luciano Frassanito, Alessandra Piersanti, Francesco Vassalli, Sara Pitoni, Ersilia Ruggiero, Roberta Nestorini, Rossano Festa, Giulia Bernardi, Paola Lombardo, Cosimo Tommaso Caputo, Gianluca Ciolli, Marco Rossi
{"title":"肩部手术中沙滩椅体位期间连续与间歇无创血压监测:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Alessandro Vergari, Luciano Frassanito, Alessandra Piersanti, Francesco Vassalli, Sara Pitoni, Ersilia Ruggiero, Roberta Nestorini, Rossano Festa, Giulia Bernardi, Paola Lombardo, Cosimo Tommaso Caputo, Gianluca Ciolli, Marco Rossi","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is frequently conducted in the beach chair position. Haemodynamic instability with hypotension and reduction of cerebral perfusion has been widely reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring using a finger-cuff reduces hypotension during arthroscopic shoulder surgery compared to standard oscillometric brachial pressure monitoring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Orthopaedic operating theatre of IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli of Rome, Italy.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Sixty patients (30 per group) scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in beach chair position under brachial plexus block plus general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All patients received noninvasive continuous haemodynamic monitoring with finger-cuff. Patients were then randomised to unblinded continuous finger-cuff arterial pressure monitoring or to intermittent oscillometric arterial pressure monitoring.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measure was time-weighted average mean arterial pressure under the threshold of 65 mmHg during surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of cerebral oxygen desaturation episodes, the incidence of severe hypotensive episodes, and the time to correct the hypotensive episode in seconds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time weighted average mean [IQR] arterial pressure under the threshold of 65 mmHg was 0.41 [0.04, 0.98] mmHg in the finger-cuff group and 0.69 [0.21, 2.20] mmHg in the Control group, with a Hodges-Lehman estimator of -0.24 (95% confidence interval: - 0.75 to 0.07) mmHg (P = 0.137).No difference in the incidence of severe hypotensive events, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg, was detected between the two groups (P = 0.017). Cerebral tissue oxygen saturation values were stable throughout the vast majority of the monitoring period, with absolute values less than 60% and relative values less than 10% of the baseline being uncommon in the two cohort of patients. A positive correlation between simultaneous tissue oxygen saturation values and mean arterial pressure was found (r = 0.298 95% confidence interval 0.283 to 0.312, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring is not effective in reducing the amount of intra-operative hypotension during shoulder surgery performed in the beach chair position compared to intermittent oscillometric monitoring.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05143632.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous versus intermittent noninvasive blood pressure monitoring during beach chair position for shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Vergari, Luciano Frassanito, Alessandra Piersanti, Francesco Vassalli, Sara Pitoni, Ersilia Ruggiero, Roberta Nestorini, Rossano Festa, Giulia Bernardi, Paola Lombardo, Cosimo Tommaso Caputo, Gianluca Ciolli, Marco Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is frequently conducted in the beach chair position. Haemodynamic instability with hypotension and reduction of cerebral perfusion has been widely reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring using a finger-cuff reduces hypotension during arthroscopic shoulder surgery compared to standard oscillometric brachial pressure monitoring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Orthopaedic operating theatre of IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli of Rome, Italy.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Sixty patients (30 per group) scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in beach chair position under brachial plexus block plus general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All patients received noninvasive continuous haemodynamic monitoring with finger-cuff. Patients were then randomised to unblinded continuous finger-cuff arterial pressure monitoring or to intermittent oscillometric arterial pressure monitoring.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measure was time-weighted average mean arterial pressure under the threshold of 65 mmHg during surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of cerebral oxygen desaturation episodes, the incidence of severe hypotensive episodes, and the time to correct the hypotensive episode in seconds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time weighted average mean [IQR] arterial pressure under the threshold of 65 mmHg was 0.41 [0.04, 0.98] mmHg in the finger-cuff group and 0.69 [0.21, 2.20] mmHg in the Control group, with a Hodges-Lehman estimator of -0.24 (95% confidence interval: - 0.75 to 0.07) mmHg (P = 0.137).No difference in the incidence of severe hypotensive events, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg, was detected between the two groups (P = 0.017). Cerebral tissue oxygen saturation values were stable throughout the vast majority of the monitoring period, with absolute values less than 60% and relative values less than 10% of the baseline being uncommon in the two cohort of patients. A positive correlation between simultaneous tissue oxygen saturation values and mean arterial pressure was found (r = 0.298 95% confidence interval 0.283 to 0.312, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring is not effective in reducing the amount of intra-operative hypotension during shoulder surgery performed in the beach chair position compared to intermittent oscillometric monitoring.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05143632.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002259\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关节镜肩关节手术经常在沙滩椅位进行。血流动力学不稳定伴低血压和脑灌注减少已被广泛报道。目的:确定在肩关节镜手术中,与标准的振荡臂压监测相比,使用袖带进行连续无创血压监测是否能降低低血压。设计:随机对照试验。地点:意大利罗马agagostino Gemelli大学IRCCS基金会骨科手术室。患者:60例患者(每组30例)计划在臂丛阻滞加全身麻醉下采用沙滩椅体位进行关节镜肩关节手术。干预措施:所有患者均接受无创袖带连续血流动力学监测。然后将患者随机分配到非盲的连续指袖动脉压监测组或间歇振荡动脉压监测组。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为手术期间低于65 mmHg阈值的时间加权平均动脉压。次要结局是脑氧不饱和发作的发生率,严重低血压发作的发生率,以及纠正低血压发作的时间(秒)。结果:65 mmHg阈值下的时间加权平均[IQR]动脉压在指套组为0.41 [0.04,0.98]mmHg,对照组为0.69 [0.21,2.20]mmHg, hogees - lehman估计量为-0.24(95%可信区间:- 0.75 ~ 0.07)mmHg (P = 0.137)。严重低血压事件(定义为平均动脉压低于50 mmHg)的发生率在两组之间无差异(P = 0.017)。脑组织氧饱和度值在绝大多数监测期间是稳定的,绝对值小于基线的60%,相对值小于基线的10%在两组患者中并不常见。同时组织氧饱和度值与平均动脉压呈正相关(r = 0.298, 95%可信区间为0.283 ~ 0.312,P)。结论:与间歇振荡监测相比,持续无创动脉压监测不能有效减少沙滩椅位肩关节手术术中低血压的发生。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05143632。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous versus intermittent noninvasive blood pressure monitoring during beach chair position for shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Background: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is frequently conducted in the beach chair position. Haemodynamic instability with hypotension and reduction of cerebral perfusion has been widely reported.

Objective: To determine whether a continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring using a finger-cuff reduces hypotension during arthroscopic shoulder surgery compared to standard oscillometric brachial pressure monitoring.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Orthopaedic operating theatre of IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli of Rome, Italy.

Patients: Sixty patients (30 per group) scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in beach chair position under brachial plexus block plus general anaesthesia.

Interventions: All patients received noninvasive continuous haemodynamic monitoring with finger-cuff. Patients were then randomised to unblinded continuous finger-cuff arterial pressure monitoring or to intermittent oscillometric arterial pressure monitoring.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measure was time-weighted average mean arterial pressure under the threshold of 65 mmHg during surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of cerebral oxygen desaturation episodes, the incidence of severe hypotensive episodes, and the time to correct the hypotensive episode in seconds.

Results: The time weighted average mean [IQR] arterial pressure under the threshold of 65 mmHg was 0.41 [0.04, 0.98] mmHg in the finger-cuff group and 0.69 [0.21, 2.20] mmHg in the Control group, with a Hodges-Lehman estimator of -0.24 (95% confidence interval: - 0.75 to 0.07) mmHg (P = 0.137).No difference in the incidence of severe hypotensive events, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg, was detected between the two groups (P = 0.017). Cerebral tissue oxygen saturation values were stable throughout the vast majority of the monitoring period, with absolute values less than 60% and relative values less than 10% of the baseline being uncommon in the two cohort of patients. A positive correlation between simultaneous tissue oxygen saturation values and mean arterial pressure was found (r = 0.298 95% confidence interval 0.283 to 0.312, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring is not effective in reducing the amount of intra-operative hypotension during shoulder surgery performed in the beach chair position compared to intermittent oscillometric monitoring.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05143632.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信