[177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T治疗老年患者的安全性、有效性和生存预后因素

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Marcel Schwinger, Charis Kalogirou, Vincent Scheper, Maximiliane Däuwel, Simon Weber, Anna Katharina Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Andreas K Buck, Rudolf A Werner, Philipp E Hartrampf
{"title":"[177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T治疗老年患者的安全性、有效性和生存预后因素","authors":"Marcel Schwinger, Charis Kalogirou, Vincent Scheper, Maximiliane Däuwel, Simon Weber, Anna Katharina Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Andreas K Buck, Rudolf A Werner, Philipp E Hartrampf","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07519-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy to explore predictors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients aged ≥ 75 and explored baseline predictors of overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>56 men (median age 78, range 75-95) were treated with RLT. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Baseline Gleason score, blood parameters (PSA, LDH), and sites of metastases (bone, lymph nodes, liver, lung) were recorded. Quantitative PET parameters such as SUVmean (mean standardized uptake value), SUVpeak (peak standardized uptake value), SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value), PSMA-TV (PSMApositive tumor volume), TL-PSMA (total lesion PSMA) were measured. PET response was assessed by RECIP 1.0 (response evaluation criteria in PSMA imaging); biochemical response by PCWG3 (prostate cancer working group 3). Associations with OS were analyzed via uni- and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No CTCAE grade III-V toxicities occurred. Grade I/II hematologic events included anemia (23.2%), leukocytopenia (18.6%) and thrombocytopenia (9.3%); eGFR declined by 2.5% (grade I/II in 18.6%). Median OS was 11 months; 60.7% of patients died. 74.4% of patients (32/43) showed PSA declines (median - 58%; 14/43 ≥ 50%). Higher baseline PSA (HR 1.001 per ng/mL; P < 0.10) and LDH (HR 1.008 per U/L; P < 0.01) were associated with shorter OS. Patients with progressive disease by both RECIP and PCWG3 had shorter OS than others (11 vs. 22 months; HR 3.3; P < 0.01). Any PSA response predicted longer OS (21 vs. 7 months; HR 0.3; P < 0.01). Presence of liver metastases portended poorer survival (8 vs. 21 months; HR 6.7; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RLT is well tolerated in patients ≥ 75 years. Lower baseline PSA and LDH but not PSMA-TV predict longer OS. Early PSA response strongly correlates with improved survival. Combined use of RECIP and PCWG3 criteria optimizes response assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radioligand treatment with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in elderly Patients - Safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for survival.\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Schwinger, Charis Kalogirou, Vincent Scheper, Maximiliane Däuwel, Simon Weber, Anna Katharina Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Andreas K Buck, Rudolf A Werner, Philipp E Hartrampf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-025-07519-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy to explore predictors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients aged ≥ 75 and explored baseline predictors of overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>56 men (median age 78, range 75-95) were treated with RLT. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Baseline Gleason score, blood parameters (PSA, LDH), and sites of metastases (bone, lymph nodes, liver, lung) were recorded. Quantitative PET parameters such as SUVmean (mean standardized uptake value), SUVpeak (peak standardized uptake value), SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value), PSMA-TV (PSMApositive tumor volume), TL-PSMA (total lesion PSMA) were measured. PET response was assessed by RECIP 1.0 (response evaluation criteria in PSMA imaging); biochemical response by PCWG3 (prostate cancer working group 3). Associations with OS were analyzed via uni- and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No CTCAE grade III-V toxicities occurred. Grade I/II hematologic events included anemia (23.2%), leukocytopenia (18.6%) and thrombocytopenia (9.3%); eGFR declined by 2.5% (grade I/II in 18.6%). Median OS was 11 months; 60.7% of patients died. 74.4% of patients (32/43) showed PSA declines (median - 58%; 14/43 ≥ 50%). Higher baseline PSA (HR 1.001 per ng/mL; P < 0.10) and LDH (HR 1.008 per U/L; P < 0.01) were associated with shorter OS. Patients with progressive disease by both RECIP and PCWG3 had shorter OS than others (11 vs. 22 months; HR 3.3; P < 0.01). Any PSA response predicted longer OS (21 vs. 7 months; HR 0.3; P < 0.01). Presence of liver metastases portended poorer survival (8 vs. 21 months; HR 6.7; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RLT is well tolerated in patients ≥ 75 years. Lower baseline PSA and LDH but not PSMA-TV predict longer OS. Early PSA response strongly correlates with improved survival. Combined use of RECIP and PCWG3 criteria optimizes response assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07519-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07519-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)靶向放射配体治疗(RLT)在≥75岁转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中的安全性和有效性,探讨[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T的预测因素,并探讨总生存期(OS)的基线预测因素。材料和方法:56名男性(中位年龄78岁,范围75-95)接受RLT治疗。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE) v5.0对不良事件进行分级。记录基线Gleason评分、血液参数(PSA、LDH)和转移部位(骨、淋巴结、肝、肺)。测量PET定量参数SUVmean(平均标准化摄取值)、SUVpeak(峰值标准化摄取值)、SUVmax(最大标准化摄取值)、PSMA- tv (psm阳性肿瘤体积)、TL-PSMA(病变总PSMA)。采用RECIP 1.0 (PSMA成像反应评价标准)评估PET反应;PCWG3(前列腺癌第三工作组)的生化反应。通过单变量和多变量Cox回归和Kaplan-Meier曲线分析与OS的关系。结果:未发生CTCAE III-V级毒性反应。I/II级血液学事件包括贫血(23.2%)、白细胞减少(18.6%)和血小板减少(9.3%);eGFR下降2.5% (I/II级下降18.6%)。中位OS为11个月;60.7%的患者死亡。74.4%的患者(32/43)出现PSA下降(中位数- 58%;14/43≥50%)。结论:[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu- psma I&T RLT在≥75岁的患者中耐受性良好。较低的基线PSA和LDH而不是PSMA-TV预测较长的OS。早期PSA反应与生存率的提高密切相关。综合使用RECIP和PCWG3标准可优化反应评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radioligand treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in elderly Patients - Safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for survival.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy to explore predictors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients aged ≥ 75 and explored baseline predictors of overall survival (OS).

Materials and methods: 56 men (median age 78, range 75-95) were treated with RLT. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Baseline Gleason score, blood parameters (PSA, LDH), and sites of metastases (bone, lymph nodes, liver, lung) were recorded. Quantitative PET parameters such as SUVmean (mean standardized uptake value), SUVpeak (peak standardized uptake value), SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value), PSMA-TV (PSMApositive tumor volume), TL-PSMA (total lesion PSMA) were measured. PET response was assessed by RECIP 1.0 (response evaluation criteria in PSMA imaging); biochemical response by PCWG3 (prostate cancer working group 3). Associations with OS were analyzed via uni- and multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results: No CTCAE grade III-V toxicities occurred. Grade I/II hematologic events included anemia (23.2%), leukocytopenia (18.6%) and thrombocytopenia (9.3%); eGFR declined by 2.5% (grade I/II in 18.6%). Median OS was 11 months; 60.7% of patients died. 74.4% of patients (32/43) showed PSA declines (median - 58%; 14/43 ≥ 50%). Higher baseline PSA (HR 1.001 per ng/mL; P < 0.10) and LDH (HR 1.008 per U/L; P < 0.01) were associated with shorter OS. Patients with progressive disease by both RECIP and PCWG3 had shorter OS than others (11 vs. 22 months; HR 3.3; P < 0.01). Any PSA response predicted longer OS (21 vs. 7 months; HR 0.3; P < 0.01). Presence of liver metastases portended poorer survival (8 vs. 21 months; HR 6.7; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T RLT is well tolerated in patients ≥ 75 years. Lower baseline PSA and LDH but not PSMA-TV predict longer OS. Early PSA response strongly correlates with improved survival. Combined use of RECIP and PCWG3 criteria optimizes response assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信