新辅助放化疗后食管内窥镜检查和EUS检查的安全性:来自SANO试验的结果。

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2645-7637
Sanjiv S G Gangaram Panday, Low Kuan Yean, Tanya M Bisseling, Wouter L Curvers, Jolanda M van Dieren, Rutger Quispel, Liekele E Oostenbrug, Andries van der Linden, Sietske Corporaal, Lieke Hol, Eva Kouw, Jolein van der Kraan, Wouter L Hazen, Judith Honing, J Jan B van Lanschot, Bianca Mostert, Joost J Nuyttens, Pieter C van der Sluis, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Manon C W Spaander, Sjoerd M Lagarde
{"title":"新辅助放化疗后食管内窥镜检查和EUS检查的安全性:来自SANO试验的结果。","authors":"Sanjiv S G Gangaram Panday, Low Kuan Yean, Tanya M Bisseling, Wouter L Curvers, Jolanda M van Dieren, Rutger Quispel, Liekele E Oostenbrug, Andries van der Linden, Sietske Corporaal, Lieke Hol, Eva Kouw, Jolein van der Kraan, Wouter L Hazen, Judith Honing, J Jan B van Lanschot, Bianca Mostert, Joost J Nuyttens, Pieter C van der Sluis, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Manon C W Spaander, Sjoerd M Lagarde","doi":"10.1055/a-2645-7637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This strategy involves repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to detect tumor regrowth or residual disease. The aim of this study was to assess safety of endoscopic procedures during active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective multicenter cohort including patients who were treated with nCRT for esophageal cancer and who underwent EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS (with fine-needle aspiration) was retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in number of serious adverse events (SAEs) in endoscopic procedures performed within vs. more than 3 months after nCRT. The secondary outcome was mechanical injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 920 patients, 2291 endoscopic procedures were performed (57% EGD combined with EUS, 39% EGD only and 4% EUS only). Of these procedures, 819 (36%) were performed more than 3 months after nCRT in 186 patients. Two gastrointestinal bleedings were reported during endoscopic procedures performed within 3 months after nCRT. One gastrointestinal bleeding and two infections were reported after 3 months following nCRT. Frequency of SAEs before and after 3 months following completion of nCRT was not significantly different (2 vs. 3, odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-32.4, <i>P</i> = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA seem to be safe during an active surveillance strategy in esophageal cancer patients after nCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a26457637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of surveillance endoscopy and EUS of the esophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from the (pre)SANO trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjiv S G Gangaram Panday, Low Kuan Yean, Tanya M Bisseling, Wouter L Curvers, Jolanda M van Dieren, Rutger Quispel, Liekele E Oostenbrug, Andries van der Linden, Sietske Corporaal, Lieke Hol, Eva Kouw, Jolein van der Kraan, Wouter L Hazen, Judith Honing, J Jan B van Lanschot, Bianca Mostert, Joost J Nuyttens, Pieter C van der Sluis, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Manon C W Spaander, Sjoerd M Lagarde\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2645-7637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This strategy involves repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to detect tumor regrowth or residual disease. The aim of this study was to assess safety of endoscopic procedures during active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective multicenter cohort including patients who were treated with nCRT for esophageal cancer and who underwent EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS (with fine-needle aspiration) was retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in number of serious adverse events (SAEs) in endoscopic procedures performed within vs. more than 3 months after nCRT. The secondary outcome was mechanical injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 920 patients, 2291 endoscopic procedures were performed (57% EGD combined with EUS, 39% EGD only and 4% EUS only). Of these procedures, 819 (36%) were performed more than 3 months after nCRT in 186 patients. Two gastrointestinal bleedings were reported during endoscopic procedures performed within 3 months after nCRT. One gastrointestinal bleeding and two infections were reported after 3 months following nCRT. Frequency of SAEs before and after 3 months following completion of nCRT was not significantly different (2 vs. 3, odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-32.4, <i>P</i> = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA seem to be safe during an active surveillance strategy in esophageal cancer patients after nCRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a26457637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372426/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2645-7637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2645-7637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:主动监测食管癌患者和新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后的临床完全缓解。该策略包括反复食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和咬合活检,以及超声内镜检查(EUS)和细针抽吸(FNA),以检测肿瘤再生或残留疾病。本研究的目的是评估主动监测期间内窥镜手术的安全性。患者和方法:回顾性分析了一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,包括接受nCRT治疗的食管癌患者和接受EGD并进行咬对咬活检和/或EUS(细针抽吸)的患者。主要结局是nCRT术后3个月内与3个月以上内镜手术中严重不良事件(SAEs)数量的差异。次要结局为机械性损伤。结果:在920例患者中,进行了2291次内镜手术(57% EGD联合EUS, 39%仅EGD和4%仅EUS)。在这些手术中,186例患者中有819例(36%)在nCRT后进行了超过3个月的手术。在nCRT后3个月内进行的内镜手术中报告了2例胃肠道出血。术后3个月,1例消化道出血,2例感染。nCRT完成后3个月前后发生SAEs的频率差异无统计学意义(2比3,优势比2.7,95%可信区间0.3-32.4,P = 0.36)。结论:在nCRT后食管癌患者的主动监测策略中,EGD +咬对咬活检和EUS + FNA似乎是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety of surveillance endoscopy and EUS of the esophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from the (pre)SANO trial.

Safety of surveillance endoscopy and EUS of the esophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from the (pre)SANO trial.

Background and study aims: Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This strategy involves repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to detect tumor regrowth or residual disease. The aim of this study was to assess safety of endoscopic procedures during active surveillance.

Patients and methods: A prospective multicenter cohort including patients who were treated with nCRT for esophageal cancer and who underwent EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS (with fine-needle aspiration) was retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in number of serious adverse events (SAEs) in endoscopic procedures performed within vs. more than 3 months after nCRT. The secondary outcome was mechanical injury.

Results: In 920 patients, 2291 endoscopic procedures were performed (57% EGD combined with EUS, 39% EGD only and 4% EUS only). Of these procedures, 819 (36%) were performed more than 3 months after nCRT in 186 patients. Two gastrointestinal bleedings were reported during endoscopic procedures performed within 3 months after nCRT. One gastrointestinal bleeding and two infections were reported after 3 months following nCRT. Frequency of SAEs before and after 3 months following completion of nCRT was not significantly different (2 vs. 3, odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-32.4, P = 0.36).

Conclusions: EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA seem to be safe during an active surveillance strategy in esophageal cancer patients after nCRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信