Sanjiv S G Gangaram Panday, Low Kuan Yean, Tanya M Bisseling, Wouter L Curvers, Jolanda M van Dieren, Rutger Quispel, Liekele E Oostenbrug, Andries van der Linden, Sietske Corporaal, Lieke Hol, Eva Kouw, Jolein van der Kraan, Wouter L Hazen, Judith Honing, J Jan B van Lanschot, Bianca Mostert, Joost J Nuyttens, Pieter C van der Sluis, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Manon C W Spaander, Sjoerd M Lagarde
{"title":"新辅助放化疗后食管内窥镜检查和EUS检查的安全性:来自SANO试验的结果。","authors":"Sanjiv S G Gangaram Panday, Low Kuan Yean, Tanya M Bisseling, Wouter L Curvers, Jolanda M van Dieren, Rutger Quispel, Liekele E Oostenbrug, Andries van der Linden, Sietske Corporaal, Lieke Hol, Eva Kouw, Jolein van der Kraan, Wouter L Hazen, Judith Honing, J Jan B van Lanschot, Bianca Mostert, Joost J Nuyttens, Pieter C van der Sluis, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Manon C W Spaander, Sjoerd M Lagarde","doi":"10.1055/a-2645-7637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This strategy involves repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to detect tumor regrowth or residual disease. The aim of this study was to assess safety of endoscopic procedures during active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective multicenter cohort including patients who were treated with nCRT for esophageal cancer and who underwent EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS (with fine-needle aspiration) was retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in number of serious adverse events (SAEs) in endoscopic procedures performed within vs. more than 3 months after nCRT. The secondary outcome was mechanical injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 920 patients, 2291 endoscopic procedures were performed (57% EGD combined with EUS, 39% EGD only and 4% EUS only). Of these procedures, 819 (36%) were performed more than 3 months after nCRT in 186 patients. Two gastrointestinal bleedings were reported during endoscopic procedures performed within 3 months after nCRT. One gastrointestinal bleeding and two infections were reported after 3 months following nCRT. Frequency of SAEs before and after 3 months following completion of nCRT was not significantly different (2 vs. 3, odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-32.4, <i>P</i> = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA seem to be safe during an active surveillance strategy in esophageal cancer patients after nCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a26457637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of surveillance endoscopy and EUS of the esophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from the (pre)SANO trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjiv S G Gangaram Panday, Low Kuan Yean, Tanya M Bisseling, Wouter L Curvers, Jolanda M van Dieren, Rutger Quispel, Liekele E Oostenbrug, Andries van der Linden, Sietske Corporaal, Lieke Hol, Eva Kouw, Jolein van der Kraan, Wouter L Hazen, Judith Honing, J Jan B van Lanschot, Bianca Mostert, Joost J Nuyttens, Pieter C van der Sluis, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Manon C W Spaander, Sjoerd M Lagarde\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2645-7637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This strategy involves repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to detect tumor regrowth or residual disease. The aim of this study was to assess safety of endoscopic procedures during active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective multicenter cohort including patients who were treated with nCRT for esophageal cancer and who underwent EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS (with fine-needle aspiration) was retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in number of serious adverse events (SAEs) in endoscopic procedures performed within vs. more than 3 months after nCRT. The secondary outcome was mechanical injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 920 patients, 2291 endoscopic procedures were performed (57% EGD combined with EUS, 39% EGD only and 4% EUS only). Of these procedures, 819 (36%) were performed more than 3 months after nCRT in 186 patients. Two gastrointestinal bleedings were reported during endoscopic procedures performed within 3 months after nCRT. One gastrointestinal bleeding and two infections were reported after 3 months following nCRT. Frequency of SAEs before and after 3 months following completion of nCRT was not significantly different (2 vs. 3, odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-32.4, <i>P</i> = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA seem to be safe during an active surveillance strategy in esophageal cancer patients after nCRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a26457637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372426/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2645-7637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2645-7637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety of surveillance endoscopy and EUS of the esophagus after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from the (pre)SANO trial.
Background and study aims: Active surveillance has been proposed for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This strategy involves repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to detect tumor regrowth or residual disease. The aim of this study was to assess safety of endoscopic procedures during active surveillance.
Patients and methods: A prospective multicenter cohort including patients who were treated with nCRT for esophageal cancer and who underwent EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS (with fine-needle aspiration) was retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in number of serious adverse events (SAEs) in endoscopic procedures performed within vs. more than 3 months after nCRT. The secondary outcome was mechanical injury.
Results: In 920 patients, 2291 endoscopic procedures were performed (57% EGD combined with EUS, 39% EGD only and 4% EUS only). Of these procedures, 819 (36%) were performed more than 3 months after nCRT in 186 patients. Two gastrointestinal bleedings were reported during endoscopic procedures performed within 3 months after nCRT. One gastrointestinal bleeding and two infections were reported after 3 months following nCRT. Frequency of SAEs before and after 3 months following completion of nCRT was not significantly different (2 vs. 3, odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 0.3-32.4, P = 0.36).
Conclusions: EGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and EUS with FNA seem to be safe during an active surveillance strategy in esophageal cancer patients after nCRT.