内镜下十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤切除术的可行性及安全性。

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2655-1439
Shao-Bin Luo, Zu-Qiang Liu, Li Wang, Yi-Qun Zhang, Ming-Yan Cai, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou
{"title":"内镜下十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤切除术的可行性及安全性。","authors":"Shao-Bin Luo, Zu-Qiang Liu, Li Wang, Yi-Qun Zhang, Ming-Yan Cai, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou","doi":"10.1055/a-2655-1439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still considered a great challenge with a high risk of complications. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal GIST.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between June 2013 and August 2024, we performed a retrospective study of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital. Data on patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and follow-up were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients with duodenal GISTs were enrolled, including 31 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 42 who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Mean lesion size was 1.2 ± 0.5 cm and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. En bloc resection rates were 96.8% and 95.2%, respectively. Rates of R0 resection were 45.2% and 42.9%, respectively. Rates of R1 resection were 54.8% and 57.1%, respectively. No patient transferred to open surgery. Postoperative adverse events included delayed bleeding (1 case), delayed perforation (1 case), delayed wall edema (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and retroperitoneal infection (1 case). Mean hospital stays were 4.1 ± 2.8 days and 6.2 ± 4.9 days, respectively. No metastasis or duodenal stenosis were detected during the follow-up period (64.8 ± 43.6 months and 61.3 ± 40.2 months, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in one patient with high recurrence risk at 56 months after EFTR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESD and EFTR are safe, minimally invasive treatments for duodenal GISTs. Moreover, the EFTR technique may have advantages of completely resecting lesions originating from the deep muscularis propria layer, particularly lesions with extraluminal growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a26551439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Shao-Bin Luo, Zu-Qiang Liu, Li Wang, Yi-Qun Zhang, Ming-Yan Cai, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2655-1439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still considered a great challenge with a high risk of complications. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal GIST.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between June 2013 and August 2024, we performed a retrospective study of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital. Data on patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and follow-up were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients with duodenal GISTs were enrolled, including 31 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 42 who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Mean lesion size was 1.2 ± 0.5 cm and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. En bloc resection rates were 96.8% and 95.2%, respectively. Rates of R0 resection were 45.2% and 42.9%, respectively. Rates of R1 resection were 54.8% and 57.1%, respectively. No patient transferred to open surgery. Postoperative adverse events included delayed bleeding (1 case), delayed perforation (1 case), delayed wall edema (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and retroperitoneal infection (1 case). Mean hospital stays were 4.1 ± 2.8 days and 6.2 ± 4.9 days, respectively. No metastasis or duodenal stenosis were detected during the follow-up period (64.8 ± 43.6 months and 61.3 ± 40.2 months, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in one patient with high recurrence risk at 56 months after EFTR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESD and EFTR are safe, minimally invasive treatments for duodenal GISTs. Moreover, the EFTR technique may have advantages of completely resecting lesions originating from the deep muscularis propria layer, particularly lesions with extraluminal growth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a26551439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-1439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-1439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与研究目的:内镜下十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤(gist)切除术仍被认为是一项巨大的挑战,并发症风险高。本研究旨在评价内镜切除十二指肠间质瘤的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:2013年6月至2024年8月,我们对中山医院十二指肠胃肠道间质瘤内镜切除术患者进行回顾性研究。收集患者特征、临床结果和随访数据。结果:共纳入73例十二指肠gist患者,其中31例患者行内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD), 42例患者行内镜全层切除(EFTR)。平均病灶大小分别为1.2±0.5 cm和1.9±0.9 cm。整体切除率分别为96.8%和95.2%。R0切除率分别为45.2%和42.9%。R1切除率分别为54.8%和57.1%。无患者转开腹手术。术后不良事件包括迟发性出血(1例)、迟发性穿孔(1例)、迟发性壁水肿(2例)、胸水(1例)、腹膜后感染(1例)。平均住院时间分别为4.1±2.8天和6.2±4.9天。随访时间分别为64.8±43.6个月和61.3±40.2个月,未发现转移和十二指肠狭窄。1例高复发风险患者在EFTR后56个月出现局部复发。结论:ESD和EFTR是十二指肠gist安全、微创的治疗方法。此外,EFTR技术可能具有完全切除源自深层固有肌层的病变的优点,特别是腔外生长的病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Background and study aims: Endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still considered a great challenge with a high risk of complications. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal GIST.

Patients and methods: Between June 2013 and August 2024, we performed a retrospective study of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital. Data on patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and follow-up were collected.

Results: A total of 73 patients with duodenal GISTs were enrolled, including 31 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 42 who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Mean lesion size was 1.2 ± 0.5 cm and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. En bloc resection rates were 96.8% and 95.2%, respectively. Rates of R0 resection were 45.2% and 42.9%, respectively. Rates of R1 resection were 54.8% and 57.1%, respectively. No patient transferred to open surgery. Postoperative adverse events included delayed bleeding (1 case), delayed perforation (1 case), delayed wall edema (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and retroperitoneal infection (1 case). Mean hospital stays were 4.1 ± 2.8 days and 6.2 ± 4.9 days, respectively. No metastasis or duodenal stenosis were detected during the follow-up period (64.8 ± 43.6 months and 61.3 ± 40.2 months, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in one patient with high recurrence risk at 56 months after EFTR.

Conclusions: ESD and EFTR are safe, minimally invasive treatments for duodenal GISTs. Moreover, the EFTR technique may have advantages of completely resecting lesions originating from the deep muscularis propria layer, particularly lesions with extraluminal growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信